Literature DB >> 15895259

An investigation into the use of MR imaging to determine the functional cross sectional area of lumbar paraspinal muscles.

Craig A Ranson1, Angus F Burnett, Robert Kerslake, Mark E Batt, Peter B O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and image processing software to determine the functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) (the area of muscle isolated from fat) of the lumbar paraspinal muscles. The measurement of the morphology of the lumbar paraspinal muscles has become the focus of several recent investigations into the aetiology of low back pain. However, the reliability and validity of determining the FCSA of the lumbar paraspinal muscles using MR imaging are yet to be reported. T2 axial MR scans at the L1-S1 spinal levels of six subjects were obtained using identical MR systems and scanning parameters. Lean paraspinal muscle, vertebral body bone and intermuscular fat were manually segmented using image analysis software to assign a grey scale range to the MR signal intensity emitted by each tissue type. The resultant grey scale range for muscle was used to determine FCSA measurements for each of the paraspinal muscles, psoas, quadratus lumborum, erector spinae and lumbar multifidus on each scan slice. As various biological, instrument and measurement factors can affect MR signal intensity, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the error associated in calculating FCSA for paraspinal muscle using a discrete grey scale range. Cross-sectional area and FCSA measurements were repeated three times and reliability indices for the FCSA measurements were obtained, showing excellent reliability, intra class correlation coefficient (mean=0.97, range 0.90-0.99) and %SEM (mean=2.6%, range 0.7-4.8%). In addition, the error associated with miscalculation of the grey scale range for the MR signal intensity of muscle was calculated and found to be low with an error of 20 grey scale units at the upper end of the muscle's grey scale range resulting in a very small error in the measured muscle FCSA. The method presented in this paper has a variety of practical applications in areas such as evidence-based rehabilitation, biomechanical modelling and the determination of segmental inertial parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895259      PMCID: PMC3489434          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0909-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain.

Authors:  D F Kader; D Wardlaw; F W Smith
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Measurement of the trunk musculature from T5 to L5 using MRI scans of 15 young males corrected for muscle fibre orientation.

Authors:  S M McGill; L Santaguida; J Stevens
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Morphometry of human neck muscles.

Authors:  L K Kamibayashi; F J Richmond
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The use of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring segment inertial properties.

Authors:  P E Martin; M Mungiole; M W Marzke; J M Longhill
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture.

Authors:  R L Lieber; J Fridén
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fibre type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  A F Mannion; L Käser; E Weber; A Rhyner; J Dvorak; M Müntener
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  R Parkkola; U Rytökoski; M Kormano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Trunk muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and density in patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Keller; Jens I Brox; Ragnhild Gunderson; Inger Holm; Astrid Friis; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The effect of comprehensive group training on cross-sectional area, density, and strength of paraspinal muscles in patients sick-listed for subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Inger Holm; Ragnhild Gunderson; Jens Ivar Brox; Kari Bø
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-06
View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Multifidus and paraspinal muscle group cross-sectional areas of patients with low back pain and control patients: a systematic review with a focus on blinding.

Authors:  Maryse Fortin; Luciana Gazzi Macedo
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-03-15

2.  Is a single-level measurement of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration and cross-sectional area representative of the entire lumbar spine?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Daniel Lobos; Marcelo Andia; Cristobal Arrieta; Sergio Uribe
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  MRI of lumbar trunk muscles in patients with Parkinson's disease and camptocormia.

Authors:  N G Margraf; A Rohr; O Granert; J Hampel; A Drews; G Deuschl
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Comparison of MRI-defined back muscles volume between patients with ankylosing spondylitis and control patients with chronic back pain: age and spinopelvic alignment matched study.

Authors:  Doo Hee Bok; Jihye Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  MRI features of the psoas major muscle in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Juraj Arbanas; Ivan Pavlovic; Verner Marijancic; Hrvoje Vlahovic; Gordana Starcevic-Klasan; Stanislav Peharec; Snjezana Bajek; Damir Miletic; Daniela Malnar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cross-sectional area of human trunk paraspinal muscles before and after posterior lumbar surgery using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Navid Arjmand; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Farzam Farahmand; Hassan Hashemi; Sahar Bagheri; Mahsa Valizadeh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Fat infiltration in the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles in subjects with sway-back posture.

Authors:  Adriano Pezolato; Everaldo Encide de Vasconcelos; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

9.  Comparison of Multilevel with Single Level Injection during Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block: Efficacy of Sympatholysis and Incidence of Psoas Muscle Injection.

Authors:  Ji Hee Hong; Min Ju Oh
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2010-05-31

10.  Lumbar paraspinal muscle fat infiltration is independently associated with sex, age, and inter-vertebral disc degeneration in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Daniel Lobos; Mauricio Campos; Cristobal Arrieta; Marcelo Andia; Sergio Uribe
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.