| Literature DB >> 36096856 |
Hailong Tian1,2, Tingting Zhang1,2, Siyuan Qin2, Zhao Huang2, Li Zhou2, Jiayan Shi3, Edouard C Nice4, Na Xie5,6,7, Canhua Huang8,9, Zhisen Shen10.
Abstract
Poor targeting of therapeutics leading to severe adverse effects on normal tissues is considered one of the obstacles in cancer therapy. To help overcome this, nanoscale drug delivery systems have provided an alternative avenue for improving the therapeutic potential of various agents and bioactive molecules through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Nanosystems with cancer-targeted ligands can achieve effective delivery to the tumor cells utilizing cell surface-specific receptors, the tumor vasculature and antigens with high accuracy and affinity. Additionally, stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms have also been considered as a promising and effective targeting strategy against tumors, as these nanoplatforms maintain their stealth feature under normal conditions, but upon homing in on cancerous lesions or their microenvironment, are responsive and release their cargoes. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the field of active targeting drug delivery systems and a number of stimuli-responsive release studies in the context of emerging nanoplatform development, and also discuss how this knowledge can contribute to further improvements in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Active targeting; Cancer treatment; Drug delivery; Stimuli-responsive materials; Targeted strategies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36096856 PMCID: PMC9469622 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01320-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol Oncol ISSN: 1756-8722 Impact factor: 23.168
Fig. 1The main drug delivery systems in tumor treatment
Fig. 2Schematic representation of receptor-mediated active targeting and passive targeting through the EPR effect
Fig. 3Schematic representation of receptor-mediated endocytosis
The overexpressed receptors on various tumor cells and their ligands
| Receptor | Ligands | Tumor | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate | Folic acid | Breast, lung, cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma | [ |
| CD14 | anti-CD14 mAb | Prostatic cancer | [ |
| CD22 | anti-CD22 mAb | Lymphoma cancer | [ |
| CD44 | HA, chondroitin sulfate | Breast, Melanoma | [ |
| αvβ3 integrin | RGD peptide | Endothelial, glioma, lung, melanoma, breast cancer | [ |
| Transferrin | TfR ligand, transferrin | Breast cancer, Glioblastoma | [ |
| HER2 | Trastuzumab Breast anti-HER2 scFv neu peptide (FCDGFYACYADV) KCCYSL (P6.1 peptide) | Breast cancer | [ |
| Estrogen | Estrone, 17 β-Estradiol, tamoxifen | Breast cancer | [ |
| Chemokine (CXCR4) | LFC131 peptide, anti-CXCR4 mAb, Peptide R, Peptide T22 | Breast, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, Lymphoma | [ |
| LHRH | Peptide | Breast cancer | [ |
| Biotin | Biotin | Breast, lung, cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma | [ |
| PSMA | A10 PSMA Apt, anti-PSMA | Prostatic cancer | [ |
| VEGF | anti-VEGF mAb | Pancreatic cancer | [ |
| IL4 | AP1 peptide | Colon, glioblastoma | [ |
| IL4 | Pep-1 | Lung cancer | [ |
| IL13 | IL13 peptide | Glioblastoma | [ |
| Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) | Lactobionic acid, galactose | Hepatocellular carcinoma | [ |
Fig. 4Schematic representation of exogenous and endogenous stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms for tumor therapy
Fig. 5(A) Schematic illustration of amplified oxidative stress based on intracellular ROS for incurring tumor cell apoptosis. B Schematic illustration of the anti-metastasis performance of the GSH-responsive nanoplatforms
ROS-responsive building blocks for cancer treatment
| Type of chemical bond | Nanoplatform | Tumor model | Therapy strategies | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thioketal linker | Polyprodrug NPDOX/Cy | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy | [ |
| Phenylboronate ester | G5.NHAc-Toy@TF nanocomplexes | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy, CDT | [ |
| pPBA(TL)-MN | Breast cancer | Immunotherapy | [ | |
| Bilirubin | Dox@bt-BRNPs | Cervical carcinoma | Chemotherapy | [ |
| TH-302@BR-Chitosan NPs | Cervical carcinoma | Chemotherapy PTT | [ | |
| Gallic acid-ferrous nanocomplex | BSO/GA–Fe(II)@ liposome | Breast cancer | CDT | [ |
| Ru nanoparticle | HA-Ru NAs | Breast cancer | PTT, PDT, CDT | [ |
| FePt nanoparticle | FePt/MoS2-FA nanocomposites | Breast cancer | Immunotherapy, PTT | [ |
| Manganese ferrite nanoparticle (MFN) | MFMSN-Ce6 | Melanoma | SDT | [ |
| Horseradish peroxidase | Lipo@HRP&ABTS | Breast cancer | PTT | [ |
| PEG-TiO1+x NRs | Breast cancer | SDT, CDT | [ | |
| Catalase | CAT@Pt (IV)-liposome | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy, RT | [ |
| CAT@HA-HMME NPs | Colorectal cancer | SDT | [ | |
| Bis(3,4,6-trichloro-2-(pentyloxycarbonyl) phenyl) oxalate | POCL | Cervical carcinoma | PDT | [ |
Fig. 6Schematic illustration of pH-responsive nanoplatforms for the delivery of therapeutic agents. The nanoplatforms can effectively accumulate in the tumor sites via the EPR effect. In the tumor microenvironment, acidic conditions can effectively trigger drug release for tumor treatment
pH-responsive building blocks for tumor treatment
| pH-sensitive building block | Therapeutic agent | Tumor model | Therapeutic application | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poly(2-(hexamethyleneimino)ethyl methacrylate | siBRD4-loaded TCPA2-NPs | Prostatic cancer | LNCaP-bearing mouse GT | [ |
| HRNMs | Glioblastoma | Chemotherapy | [ | |
| Poly(diisopropanol amino ethyl methacrylate) | GPDPA NPs | Glioblastoma | Chemotherapy PTT | [ |
| Benzoic-imine bond | CA-MTX NPs | Cervical carcinoma | Chemotherapy | [ |
| nBSA-Dox | Hepatocellular carcinoma | Chemotherapy | [ | |
| NdIIIIP-N = CH-PEG | Cervical carcinoma | Chemotherapy PTT | [ | |
| DOX-ICM | Glioblastoma | Chemotherapy | [ | |
| Au@PP/RA/siRNA | Pancreatic cancer | Chemotherapy | [ | |
| Pyridine-2-imine | Gold nanomachine | Breast cancer | PTT | [ |
| PMNP-DOX@RBC | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy, CDT | [ | |
| Amide bond | DOX-CC-NP | Squamous cell carcinoma | Chemotherapy | [ |
| PDNBF NPs | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy PTT | [ | |
| Nanodrug complex | MONCs | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy PDT | [ |
| B780/Qu NPs | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy PDT, PTT | [ | |
| Gadolinium oxide | Gd2O3 NSs | Melanoma | Chemotherapy | [ |
| FS-GdNDs | Breast cancer | PTT | [ | |
| Triplex DNA sequence | NLNs/DOX | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy | [ |
| DNA Conjugated AuNPs | Breast cancer | Chemotherapy PTT | [ |
Hypoxia-selective chemical bond-triggered nanoplatforms
| Type of chemical bond | Therapeutic agent | Therapy method | Tumor model | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitro | DOX/CP-NI NPs | Chemotherapy, PDT | Cervical carcinoma | [ |
| DOX@HMs | Chemotherapy, RT | Breast cancer | [ | |
| DOX/FOBD liposome | Chemotherapy | Cervical cancer | [ | |
| HRNP/siRNA | Chemotherapy | Breast cancer | [ | |
| HC/PN/DOX NPs | Chemotherapy, PDT | Lung cancer | [ | |
| NCs/DOX + Ce6 micelles | Chemotherapy, PDT | Breast cancer | [ | |
| ALP-(MIs)n/DOX | Chemotherapy, RT | Glioma | [ | |
| Gd-Au DENPs-Nit | RT | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | [ | |
| Azo | DOX@AMOFs@ DRHC/CPPs | Chemotherapy | Breast cancer | [ |
| mPEG-AzoPAsp-IM micelles | PDT | Lewis lung carcinoma | [ | |
| DOX@NP | Chemotherapy | Lung cancer | [ | |
| CPs-CPT-Ce6 NPs | Chemotherapy, PDT | Cervical carcinoma | [ | |
| PEG-Azo-PEI-DOPE | Chemotherapy | Cervical carcinoma | [ | |
| CAGE | Immunotherapy, PDT | Melanoma | [ | |
| ALN-HR-PMs/DOX | Chemotherapy | Prostate cancer | [ | |
| N-oxide | TPZ/UCSs | Photodynamic/Chemo/ immunotherapy | Colorectal cancer | [ |
| HAS-GOx-Fe3+-TA (HGTFT) | Chemotherapy, CDT | Breast cancer | [ | |
| TENAB NPs | Chemotherapy, PTT, PDT | Cervical carcinoma | [ | |
| Lip/Ce6/TPZ NPs | Chemotherapy, PDT | Breast cancer | [ | |
| UiO-66-H-P NMOFs | Chemotherapy, PDT | Glioblastoma | [ | |
| HA@AQ4N-Cu (II)-gossypol NPs | Chemotherapy | Prostatic cancer | [ | |
| YS-DMONs-AQ4N- GOx | Chemotherapy | Prostatic cancer | [ | |
| Mn-APPMSF | Chemotherapy, PTT | Hepatocellular carcinoma | [ | |
| AQ4N-64Cu-hCe6- liposome | Chemotherapy, PDT | Breast cancer | [ |
The hybridization and combination of cancer nanomedicine
| Targeting strategy | Stimuli-responsiveness | Therapeutic agent | Tumor type | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | pH | PEG-FA/(DOX + VER)@ZIF-8 | Melanoma | [ |
| GSH | FA-S–S-PLGA NPs | Lung cancer | [ | |
| ROS | Lut/FA-Oxi-αCD NPs | Breast cancer | [ | |
| MMP2 | F/TMSP-NLC | Fibrosarcoma | [ | |
| pH and GSH | PsEEL-DOX/PTX NMs | Lung cancer | [ | |
| pH and ROS | DT-NP | Breast cancer | [ | |
| pH and laser | HM-Bi@PEG-FA NSs | Lung cancer | [ | |
| HA | GSH | HL/MOS@M780&LOD NPs | Breast cancer | [ |
| pH | HA/(R837 + 1 MT)@ZIF-8 | Melanoma | [ | |
| Laser | DOX/ICG-CuS@MnO2/HA NPs | Breast cancer | [ | |
| pH and GSH | DOX/siGCN5@HPMSNs | Breast cancer | [ | |
| GSH and hypoxia | PaHAsC | Melanoma | [ | |
| RGD | GSH | RGD/MoS2/DOX | Cervical cancer | [ |
| pH | Met/GOx@His/ZIF-8∼RGD | Breast cancer | [ | |
| MMP-2 | RHMH18@AuD NPs | Ovarian cancer | [ | |
| Laser | SPIOCs@HSA(PTX)-RGD | Glioma | [ | |
| pH and esterase | IR825@IRI-ATRA/RGD NPs | Breast cancer | [ | |
| pH and GSH | CuS DENPs | Breast cancer | [ | |
| Biotin | pH | B780/Qu NPs | Breast cancer | [ |
| GSH | SS-biotin-Ppy NWs | Breast cancer | [ | |
| Transferrin | Temperature | TMNP | Breast cancer | [ |
| GSH | DMSN@PMAsh-Tf | Lung cancer | [ | |
| pH/temperature | LF-PNIPAM-co-AA | Breast cancer | [ | |
| LHRH | GSH | PTX-LHRH-DCMs | Breast cancer | [ |
| pH, HIFU, and ultrasound | LHRH-ELP-DOX | Breast cancer | [ | |
| EPR effects | pH and cathepsin B | TNV | Melanoma and colon cancer | [ |
| P2, pH and ROS | SRF/Ce6-loaded PEG-M-PPMT NPs | Lung cancer | [ | |
| RGD and EPR effects | Laser and GSH | RDG/shRNA | Breast cancer | [ |
Fig. 7Schematic illustration of stimuli-responsive and targeted nanoplatforms for the specific delivery of therapeutic agents. A Preparation of the smart nanoplatform via electrostatic and hydrophobic interaction, and the pH-responsive surface charge switch, and GSH-responsive chemical degradation of polymer backbone. B Schematic illustration of and FA-mediated target and pH/GSH-responsive delivery processes: (a) the nanoplatforms show high stability in blood circulation; (b) therefore, they can effectively accumulate in tumor lesions via the EPR effect and receptor-mediated targeting; (c) acidic conditions can cause charge conversion of the nanoplatform; (d) endosome escape of the smart nanoplatform via proton-sponge effect; (e) intracellular GSH stimulation will trigger the release of therapeutic agents for tumor treatment