Literature DB >> 24512032

The clinical importance of assessing tumor hypoxia: relationship of tumor hypoxia to prognosis and therapeutic opportunities.

Joseph C Walsh1, Artem Lebedev, Edward Aten, Kathleen Madsen, Liane Marciano, Hartmuth C Kolb.   

Abstract

Tumor hypoxia is a well-established biological phenomenon that affects the curability of solid tumors, regardless of treatment modality. Especially for head and neck cancer patients, tumor hypoxia is linked to poor patient outcomes. Given the biological problems associated with tumor hypoxia, the goal for clinicians has been to identify moderately to severely hypoxic tumors for differential treatment strategies. The "gold standard" for detecting and characterizing of tumor hypoxia are the invasive polarographic electrodes. Several less invasive hypoxia assessment techniques have also shown promise for hypoxia assessment. The widespread incorporation of hypoxia information in clinical tumor assessment is severely impeded by several factors, including regulatory hurdles and unclear correlation with potential treatment decisions. There is now an acute need for approved diagnostic technologies for determining the hypoxia status of cancer lesions, as it would enable clinical development of personalized, hypoxia-based therapies, which will ultimately improve outcomes. A number of different techniques for assessing tumor hypoxia have evolved to replace polarographic pO2 measurements for assessing tumor hypoxia. Several of these modalities, either individually or in combination with other imaging techniques, provide functional and physiological information of tumor hypoxia that can significantly improve the course of treatment. The assessment of tumor hypoxia will be valuable to radiation oncologists, surgeons, and biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies who are engaged in developing hypoxia-based therapies or treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24512032      PMCID: PMC4159937          DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal        ISSN: 1523-0864            Impact factor:   8.401


  294 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of changes in tumor biology with treatment.

Authors:  Sonia P Li; Anwar R Padhani; Andreas Makris
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: regulator of mitochondrial metabolism and mediator of ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-08-21

Review 3.  Hypoxia: importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy.

Authors:  James L Tatum; Gary J Kelloff; Robert J Gillies; Jeffrey M Arbeit; J Martin Brown; K S Clifford Chao; J Donald Chapman; William C Eckelman; Anthony W Fyles; Amato J Giaccia; Richard P Hill; Cameron J Koch; Murali Cherukuri Krishna; Kenneth A Krohn; Jason S Lewis; Ralph P Mason; Giovanni Melillo; Anwar R Padhani; Garth Powis; Joseph G Rajendran; Richard Reba; Simon P Robinson; Gregg L Semenza; Harold M Swartz; Peter Vaupel; David Yang; Barbara Croft; John Hoffman; Guoying Liu; Helen Stone; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 4.  Novel radiation sensitizers targeting tissue hypoxia.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 5.  The cancer biomarker osteopontin: combination with other markers.

Authors:  Georg F Weber
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

6.  Dosimetry of 60/61/62/64Cu-ATSM: a hypoxia imaging agent for PET.

Authors:  Richard Laforest; Farrokh Dehdashti; Jason S Lewis; Sally W Schwarz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Hypoxia imaging with the nitroimidazole 18F-FAZA PET tracer: a comparison with OxyLite, EPR oximetry and 19F-MRI relaxometry.

Authors:  Ly-Binh-An Tran; Anne Bol; Daniel Labar; Bénédicte Jordan; Julie Magat; Lionel Mignion; Vincent Grégoire; Bernard Gallez
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Hypoxia in human colorectal adenocarcinoma: comparison between extrinsic and potential intrinsic hypoxia markers.

Authors:  Laurence Goethals; Annelies Debucquoy; Christiaan Perneel; Karel Geboes; Nadine Ectors; Harlinde De Schutter; Freddy Penninckx; William H McBride; Adrian C Begg; Karin M Haustermans
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  M Höckel; C Knoop; K Schlenger; B Vorndran; E Baussmann; M Mitze; P G Knapstein; P Vaupel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  A marker for hypoxic cells in tumours with potential clinical applicability.

Authors:  J D Chapman; A J Franko; J Sharplin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  118 in total

1.  Mathematical modelling of trastuzumab-induced immune response in an in vivo murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Meghan J Bloom; Wesley Godfrey; Anum K Syed; David A Ekrut; Lauren I Ehrlich; Thomas E Yankeelov; Anna G Sorace
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Characterization of gradient echo signal decays in healthy and cancerous prostate at 3T improves with a Gaussian augmentation of the mono-exponential (GAME) model.

Authors:  Pelin Aksit Ciris; Mukund Balasubramanian; Ravi T Seethamraju; Junichi Tokuda; Jonathan Scalera; Tobias Penzkofer; Fiona M Fennessy; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Kemal Tuncali; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  The cellular basis of increased PET hypoxia tracer uptake in focal cerebral ischemia with comparison between [18F]FMISO and [64Cu]CuATSM.

Authors:  Philip V Little; Fabian Arnberg; Emma Jussing; Li Lu; Andreas Ingemann Jensen; Nicholas Mitsios; Jan Mulder; Thuy A Tran; Staffan Holmin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Disulfiram causes selective hypoxic cancer cell toxicity and radio-chemo-sensitization via redox cycling of copper.

Authors:  Kelly C Falls-Hubert; Aimee L Butler; Kai Gui; Michael Anderson; Mengshi Li; Jeffrey M Stolwijk; Samuel N Rodman; Shane R Solst; Ann Tomanek-Chalkley; Charles C Searby; Val C Sheffield; Vanessa Sandfort; Hartmut Schmidt; Michael L McCormick; Brian R Wels; Bryan G Allen; Garry R Buettner; Michael K Schultz; Douglas R Spitz
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Three-dimensional alginate hydrogels for radiobiological and metabolic studies of cancer cells.

Authors:  Graham H Read; Natsuko Miura; Jenna L Carter; Kelsey T Kines; Kazutoshi Yamamoto; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Jason Y Cheng; Kevin A Camphausen; Murali C Krishna; Aparna H Kesarwala
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 6.  The clinical utility of imaging methods used to measure hypoxia in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Waller; Benjamin Onderdonk; Ann Flood; Harold Swartz; Jaffer Shah; Asghar Shah; Bulent Aydogan; Howard Halpern; Yasmin Hasan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Direct and Repeated Clinical Measurements of pO2 for Enhancing Cancer Therapy and Other Applications.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Benjamin B Williams; Huagang Hou; Nadeem Khan; Lesley A Jarvis; Eunice Y Chen; Philip E Schaner; Arif Ali; Bernard Gallez; Periannan Kuppusamy; Ann B Flood
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Sarcoma Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsagozis; Jordi Gonzalez-Molina; Anna-Maria Georgoudaki; Kaisa Lehti; Joseph Carlson; Andreas Lundqvist; Felix Haglund; Monika Ehnman
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Characterizing gradient echo signal decays in gynecologic cancers at 3T using a Gaussian augmentation of the monoexponential (GAME) model.

Authors:  Pelin A Ciris; Mukund Balasubramanian; Antonio L Damato; Ravi T Seethamraju; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Robert V Mulkern; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  An Activatable NIR Fluorescent Rosol for Selectively Imaging Nitroreductase Activity.

Authors:  Jessica L Klockow; Kenneth S Hettie; Edward L LaGory; Eui Jung Moon; Amato J Giaccia; Edward E Graves; Frederick T Chin
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 7.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.