Literature DB >> 7137251

Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience.

P R Meier, R P Porreco.   

Abstract

Elective repeat cesarean section is one of the major factors responsible for the increase in the total cesarean section rate observed since 1970. Beginning in January, 1980, a voluntary program encouraging a trial of labor for patients with a documented previous low-transverse cesarean section and no apparent recurring indication was instituted. Two hundred seven patients were managed with an adequate trial of labor, and 84.5% were delivered vaginally over a 2-year period. There were no deaths associated with a trial of labor, and maternal and fetal morbidity was negligible. This voluntary program resulted in a 27.9% decrease in the repeat cesarean section rate over the 2 years reported. Patient and physician acceptance of such a program was evaluated by follow-up questionnaires. Current recommendations include a mandatory trial of labor in patients with only one previous low-transverse cesarean section and no current indication for cesarean delivery. A more liberal management policy regarding patients with two or more previous low-transverse cesarean sections also seems warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7137251     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90436-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

Review 2.  The use of oxytocin after a previous caesarean section--a review and report on a series.

Authors:  D Bider; G Barkai; H J Carp; S Mashiach
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  The effect of induced abortion on the risks and outcome of a trial of labor after a previous cesarean birth.

Authors:  K C Edelin; D Oellerich; J R Larrieux
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; H Bilodeau; R Blais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Delivery after caesarean section: review of 2176 consecutive cases.

Authors:  B G Molloy; O Sheil; N M Duignan
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-06-27

8.  Maternal urological injuries associated with vaginal deliveries: change of pattern.

Authors:  S A Kattan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Elective repeat cesarean sections: how many could be vaginal births?

Authors:  P Norman; S Kostovcik; A Lanning
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; L Potvin; R Blais; H Bilodeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.