Literature DB >> 3701658

Modulation by applied electric fields of Purkinje and stellate cell activity in the isolated turtle cerebellum.

C Y Chan, C Nicholson.   

Abstract

Quasi steady-state electric fields were applied across the isolated turtle cerebellum to study the relationship between applied field, neuronal morphology and the modulation of the neuronal spike firing pattern. Spiking elements were identified electrophysiologically using extracellular recording methods and by subsequent horseradish peroxidase injection, which revealed their dendritic morphology and orientation. The electric field was precisely defined by measuring the voltage gradients induced in the cerebellum by 40 s constant-current pulses. The field was constant in the vertical (dorso-ventral) axis and zero in the horizontal plane, in agreement with theory. Neurones were modulated by applying a sinusoidal field at frequencies between 0.05 and 1.0 Hz. Modulated cells exhibited an increase in firing frequency and fell into one of four classes, depending on the direction of the field that produced the modulation. Thus neurones were excited by: ventricle-directed fields (V modulation), pia-directed fields (P modulation), both of the above (V/P modulation) or showed no consistent modulation (non-modulation). Most Purkinje somata and primary dendrites (nineteen out of twenty-eight) and most Purkinje dendrites (eighteen out of thirty), were V modulated with maximum rate proportional to the peak field intensity. The dendrites of these cells were consistently oriented toward the pia. Among the stellate cells, the lower molecular layer stellates, with dendrites extending predominantly towards the pia, were mostly (nineteen out of thirty-two) V modulated. The mid-molecular layer stellates, which showed much variability in dendritic orientation, were distributed among all four of the modulation classes. The upper molecular layer stellates, with a mostly horizontal dendritic alignment, were mainly (nine out of sixteen) non-modulated. All groups of spiking elements showed a correlation between patterns of modulation by applied fields and dendritic orientation, which suggests the degree of differential polarization of the extended cable elements of the neurone by the applied field as the basic mechanism for field-induced excitation or inhibition. The threshold for modulation among all neurones was 15-20 mV/mm, which is similar to the fields that modulate other nervous tissues. This suggests that many neurones can be modulated by fields of the order of 10-20 mV/mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3701658      PMCID: PMC1192712          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  33 in total

1.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Electrical conductivity in cat cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  M Yedlin; H Kwan; J T Murphy; H Nguyen-Huu; Y C Wong
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  A neuronal inhibition mediated electrically.

Authors:  D S Faber; H Korn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Synchronization without active chemical synapses during hippocampal afterdischarges.

Authors:  C P Taylor; F E Dudek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum.

Authors:  C Nicholson; J A Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue.

Authors:  A R Gardner-Medwin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea-pig hippocampal slices.

Authors:  J G Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of the rat cerebellum.

Authors:  C Nicholson; J M Phillips
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Electrophysiological properties of in vitro Purkinje cell dendrites in mammalian cerebellar slices.

Authors:  R Llinás; M Sugimori
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Changes of extracellular potassium activity induced by electric current through brain tissue in the rat.

Authors:  A R Gardner-Medwin; C Nicholson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  99 in total

1.  Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies.

Authors:  G R Holt; C Koch
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Column-based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Peter T Fox; Shalini Narayana; Nitin Tandon; Hugo Sandoval; Sarabeth P Fox; Peter Kochunov; Jack L Lancaster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Masashi Inoue; Hiroki Akiyama; Jackie K Deans; John E Fox; Hiroyoshi Miyakawa; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Can Neural Activity Propagate by Endogenous Electrical Field?

Authors:  Chen Qiu; Rajat S Shivacharan; Mingming Zhang; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The origin of extracellular fields and currents--EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Costas A Anastassiou; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  A model of the effects of applied electric fields on neuronal synchronization.

Authors:  Eun-Hyoung Park; Ernest Barreto; Bruce J Gluckman; Steven J Schiff; Paul So
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 9.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.