Literature DB >> 29704512

The effect of the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the cerebellum on the motor cortex excitability.

Mehlika Panpalli Ates1, Halil Can Alaydin2, Bulent Cengiz3.   

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate whether the cerebellum has an inhibitory effect on motor cortical excitability. Sixteen healthy adults (age range, 25-50 years, five female) participated in the study. Anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (a-cTDCS) was used to modulate cerebellar excitability. A-cTDCS was given for 20 min at 1 mA intensity. The automatic threshold tracking method was used to investigate cortical excitability. Resting motor threshold (RMT), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and the input output curve (I-O curve) were motor cortical excitability parameters. a-cTDCS caused a reduction in overall SICI and the reduced SICF for interstimulus intervals (ISIs) to 2.4-4.4 ms. a-cTDCS has no effect on ICF, RMT, and the I-O curve. There were no significant changes in any of these cortical excitability parameters after sham cTDCS. Results of the study indicate that a-cTDCS has a dual (both inhibitory and excitatory) effect on motor cortical excitability, rather than a simple inhibitory effect. The cerebellum modulates both the inhibitory and facilitatory activities of motor cortex (M1) and suggest that cerebello-cerebral motor connectivity is more complex than solely inhibitory or facilitatory connections.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Automatic threshold tracking; Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation; Motor cortical excitability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29704512     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  6 in total

1.  Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Keita Takano; Natsuki Katagiri; Takatsugu Sato; Masafumi Jin; Tadaki Koseki; Daisuke Kudo; Kaito Yoshida; Shigeo Tanabe; Masahiro Tsujikawa; Kunitsugu Kondo; Tomofumi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.648

2.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.

Authors:  Wei-Yeh Liao; Ryoki Sasaki; John G Semmler; George M Opie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Interactions Between Cerebellum and the Intracortical Excitatory Circuits of Motor Cortex: a Mini-Review.

Authors:  George M Opie; Wei-Yeh Liao; John G Semmler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation - An intraindividual comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  Rebecca Herzog; Till M Berger; Martje G Pauly; Honghu Xue; Elmar Rueckert; Alexander Münchau; Tobias Bäumer; Anne Weissbach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Lidio Lima de Albuquerque; Milan Pantovic; Mitchell G Clingo; Katherine M Fischer; Sharon Jalene; Merrill R Landers; Zoltan Mari; Brach Poston
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.648

6.  Characterising the influence of cerebellum on the neuroplastic modulation of intracortical motor circuits.

Authors:  George M Opie; John G Semmler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.