Literature DB >> 36050172

Optimizing distortion product otoacoustic emission recordings in normal-hearing ears by adopting cochlear place-specific stimuli.

Samantha Stiepan1, Shawn S Goodman2, Sumitrajit Dhar1.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) provide a window into active cochlear processes and have become a popular clinical and research tool. DPOAEs are commonly recorded using stimulus with fixed presentation levels and frequency ratio irrespective of the test frequency. However, this is inconsistent with the changing mechanical properties of the cochlear partition from the base to the apex that lend specific frequency-dependent spatial properties to the cochlear traveling wave. Therefore, the frequency and level characteristics between the stimulus tones should also need to be adjusted as a function of frequency to maintain optimal interaction between them. The goal of this investigation was to establish a frequency-specific measurement protocol guided by local cochlear mechanics. A broad stimulus parameter space extending up to 20 kHz was explored in a group of normal-hearing individuals. The stimulus frequency ratio yielding the largest 2f1-f2 DPOAE level changed as a function of frequency and stimulus level. Specifically, for a constant stimulus level, the frequency ratio producing the largest DPOAE level decreased with increasing frequency. Similarly, at a given f2 frequency, the stimulus frequency ratio producing the largest DPOAE level became wider as stimulus level increased. These results confirm and strengthen our current understanding of DPOAE generation in the normally functioning cochlea and expand our understanding to previously unexamined higher frequencies. These data support the use of frequency- and level-specific stimulus frequency ratios to maximize DPOAE generation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36050172      PMCID: PMC9348896          DOI: 10.1121/10.0013218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  53 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves.

Authors:  P Dallos; M A Cheatham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Shapes of tuning curves for single auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; M B Sachs; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An active process in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.