Literature DB >> 1564196

Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters.

M L Whitehead1, B L Lonsbury-Martin, G K Martin.   

Abstract

The results of studies of the physiological vulnerability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) suggest that the DPOAE at 2f1-f2 in vertebrate ears is generated by more than one source. The principal aims of the present study were to provide independent evidence for the existence of more than one DPOAE source, and to determine the contributions of each to the ear-canal 2f1-f2 signal. To accomplish these aims, specific stimulus parameters were separately and systematically varied to provide detailed parametric information regarding 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude and phase in normal ears of awake rabbits. The findings indicate that two discrete sources, demonstrating differential dependence on stimulus parameters, dominate the generation of the 2f1-f2 DPOAE. One source of distortion is dominant above 60-70 dB SPL at moderate primary-frequency separations, and at all stimulus levels when the primary tones are closely spaced. The other source is dominant below 60-70 dB SPL at moderate primary-frequency separations, and may be dominant at all stimulus levels when the primary tones are widely separated in frequency. The results suggest that by varying stimulus parameters, it may be possible to independently study the two generator mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1564196     DOI: 10.1121/1.402440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster; Barden B Stagner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

2.  Effects of whole body vibration on outer hair cells' hearing response to distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Seyyed-Ali Moussavi-Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Mehdi Akbari
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Source of level dependent minima in rabbit distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P F Fahey; B B Stagner; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Different effects of noise and salicylate and their interactions on the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  M Aoyagi; M Yoshida; K Makishima
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Shawna Dell; Brittany Hensley; James W Hall; Kathleen C M Campbell; Patrick J Antonelli; Glenn E Green; James M Miller; Kenneth Guire
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance?

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Stimulus-frequency-dependent dominance of sound localization cues across the cochleotopic map of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Ryan Dorkoski; Kenneth E Hancock; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.