Literature DB >> 23035108

Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Conor J Wild1, Afiqah Yusuf, Daryl E Wilson, Jonathan E Peelle, Matthew H Davis, Ingrid S Johnsrude.   

Abstract

The conditions of everyday life are such that people often hear speech that has been degraded (e.g., by background noise or electronic transmission) or when they are distracted by other tasks. However, it remains unclear what role attention plays in processing speech that is difficult to understand. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the degree to which spoken sentences were processed under distraction, and whether this depended on the acoustic quality (intelligibility) of the speech. On every trial, adult human participants attended to one of three simultaneously presented stimuli: a sentence (at one of four acoustic clarity levels), an auditory distracter, or a visual distracter. A postscan recognition test showed that clear speech was processed even when not attended, but that attention greatly enhanced the processing of degraded speech. Furthermore, speech-sensitive cortex could be parcellated according to how speech-evoked responses were modulated by attention. Responses in auditory cortex and areas along the superior temporal sulcus (STS) took the same form regardless of attention, although responses to distorted speech in portions of both posterior and anterior STS were enhanced under directed attention. In contrast, frontal regions, including left inferior frontal gyrus, were only engaged when listeners were attending to speech and these regions exhibited elevated responses to degraded, compared with clear, speech. We suggest this response is a neural marker of effortful listening. Together, our results suggest that attention enhances the processing of degraded speech by engaging higher-order mechanisms that modulate perceptual auditory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23035108      PMCID: PMC6704770          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  76 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Dana R Murphy; Fergus I M Craik; Karen Z H Li; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-06

2.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production.

Authors:  K E Watkins; A P Strafella; T Paus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity.

Authors:  Jennifer M Rodd; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Subliminal speech priming.

Authors:  Sid Kouider; Emmanuel Dupoux
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-08

6.  Post-rolandic cortical projections of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  B Seltzer; D N Pandya
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1991-10-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.

Authors:  G A MILLER; G A HEISE; W LICHTEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-05

8.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).

Authors:  N L Wood; N Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1995-09

9.  The temporal lobe is a target of output from the basal ganglia.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Human auditory cortex is sensitive to the perceived clarity of speech.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  128 in total

1.  Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Susan E Teubner-Rhodes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Stephanie L Cute; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan A Blank
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  A functional dissociation between language and multiple-demand systems revealed in patterns of BOLD signal fluctuations.

Authors:  Idan Blank; Nancy Kanwisher; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The relationship between maternal education and the neural substrates of phoneme perception in children: Interactions between socioeconomic status and proficiency level.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Neural responses to grammatically and lexically degraded speech.

Authors:  Alexa Bautista; Stephen M Wilson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Infant-Directed Speech Enhances Attention to Speech in Deaf Infants With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Tonya R Bergeson; Derek M Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Shaken, not stirred: emergence of neural selectivity in a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Lee M Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.