| Literature DB >> 36045215 |
Daniela M Monsanto1, Devon C Main1, Charlene Janion-Scheepers2,3, Arsalan Emami-Khoyi1, Louis Deharveng4, Anne Bedos4, Mikhail Potapov5,6, Shilpa P Parbhu1, Johannes J Le Roux7, Peter R Teske1, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren8.
Abstract
A longstanding question in evolutionary biology is how natural selection and environmental pressures shape the mitochondrial genomic architectures of organisms. Mitochondria play a pivotal role in cellular respiration and aerobic metabolism, making their genomes functionally highly constrained. Evaluating selective pressures on mitochondrial genes can provide functional and ecological insights into the evolution of organisms. Collembola (springtails) are an ancient hexapod group that includes the oldest terrestrial arthropods in the fossil record, and that are closely associated with soil environments. Of interest is the diversity of habitat stratification preferences (life forms) exhibited by different species within the group. To understand whether signals of positive selection are linked to the evolution of life forms, we analysed 32 published Collembola mitogenomes in a phylomitogenomic framework. We found no evidence that signatures of selection are correlated with the evolution of novel life forms, but rather that mutations have accumulated as a function of time. Our results highlight the importance of nuclear-mitochondrial interactions in the evolution of collembolan life forms and that mitochondrial genomic data should be interpreted with caution, as complex selection signals may complicate evolutionary inferences.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36045215 PMCID: PMC9433435 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18407-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on the mitogenomes of 32 collembolan species from four orders and three outgroup taxa indicating the evolution of life form traits for each species (blue: aquatic; red: myrmecophilous; pink: euedaphic; cyan: hemiedaphic, and green: epiedaphic). The pie charts along the terminal branches represent the number of nonsynonymous (black segments) and synonymous (grey segments) mutations. The coloured pie charts represent the proportion of nonsynonymous mutations (i.e. dN/(dN + dS)) for the branches/clades that represent the evolution of an alternative life form (blue: aquatic; red: myrmecophilous; pink: euedaphic, and green: epiedaphic) vs. the sister branches/taxa that represents the ancestral state (cyan: hemiedaphic). Where multiple branches are present (i.e. clades), we accounted for the number of taxa by averaging the proportion of mutations for each terminal and internal branch.
Figure 2Scatter plots and regression lines displaying the number of nonsynonymous mutations as a proportion of the total number of mutations (i.e. dN/(dN + dS)) as a function of time (i.e. branch length/node age (Ma)). The blue dots represent the proportion of nonsynonymous mutations for taxa with the ancestral state (R2 = 0.52), while the red dots represent the taxa that illustrate life form shifts (i.e. the alternative state) (R2 = 0.82). The shaded regions represent the 95% confidence intervals of the regression lines.