| Literature DB >> 30606099 |
Tao Pan1,2, Hui Wang1, Pablo Orozcoterwengel3, Chao-Chao Hu4, Gui-You Wu1, Li-Fu Qian1, Zhong-Lou Sun1, Wen-Bo Shi1, Peng Yan2, Xiao-Bing Wu2, Bao-Wei Zhang5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Climate oscillation may have a profound effect on species distributions, gene flow patterns and population demography. In response to environmental change, those species restricted to montane habitats experienced expansions and contractions along elevation gradients, which can drive differentiation among sky islands.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; Niche conservatism; Pachyhynobius shangchengensis; Phylogeography; Population demography; Sky island
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30606099 PMCID: PMC6318985 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1333-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Sampling area and populations of P. shangchengensis. Sample sites are represented as triangles or dots in different colors. The map derived from https://glovis.usgs.gov/. The basic vector layers of rivers derived from http://www.resdc.cn/
Descriptive statistics for mitochondrial genes and 12 micorsatellite loci for P. shangchengensis populations in Dabie Mountains
| Populations | Mitochondrial gene | Microsatellites | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tajima’s | Fu’s |
| |||||||
| JTX | 31 | 0.929 ± 0.030 | 0.0019 ± 0.0002 | −1.326 | −8.157* | 53 | 8.83 ± 1.04 | 0.604 ± 0.074 | 0.702 ± 0.074 | 0.157 ± 0.064 |
| KHJ | 33 | 0.909 ± 0.032 | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 | −1.221 | −9.949* | 48 | 9.25 ± 1.20 | 0.596 ± 0.088 | 0.699 ± 0.083 | 0.150 ± 0.063 |
| MW | 37 | 0.983 ± 0.010 | 0.0024 ± 0.0002 | −1.645* | −20.902* | 69 | 12.92 ± 1.13 | 0.687 ± 0.065 | 0.780 ± 0.068 | 0.107 ± 0.036 |
| TTZ | 35 | 0.983 ± 0.013 | 0.0029 ± 0.0003 | −1.199 | −19.588* | 29 | 11.67 ± 1.14 | 0.724 ± 0.072 | 0.785 ± 0.066 | 0.147 ± 0.085 |
| BYM | 33 | 0.981 ± 0.015 | 0.0030 ± 0.0004 | −1.781* | −16.555* | 124 | 17.42 ± 1.10 | 0.756 ± 0.041 | 0.837 ± 0.041 | 0.095 ± 0.023 |
| KJY | 24 | 0.746 ± 0.071 | 0.0026 ± 0.0007 | −0.627 | −0.303 | 22 | 10.00 ± 1.12 | 0.696 ± 0.071 | 0.776 ± 0.051 | 0.120 ± 0.054 |
| Total | 193 | 0.990 ± 0.002 | 0.0345 ± 0.0004 | −1.329 | − 12.211 | 345 | 20.33 ± 1.44 | 0.693 ± 0.053 | 0.827 ± 0.059 | 0.077 ± 0.017 |
Note: N sample size, Hd haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity, Na number of alleles, HO observed heterozygosity, HE expected heterozygosity, F fixation index, P values of Tajima’s D test and Fu’s Fs test were calculated with 10,000 simulations, significant tests are indicated with an asterisk (* P < 0.01). The Tajima’s D test and Fu’s Fs test of KJY population were conducted excluding the two KJY haplotypes clustered within the BYM population
Fig. 2Phylogenetic relationships and haplotype network based on the mtDNA haplotypes of P. shangchengensis. a Phylogenetic tree of P. shangchengensis based on mitochondrial data. The numbers above branches are Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) indicating node support and the numbers underneath branches are split time estimates (Mya) with their 95% highest posterior density in square brackets; b Median-joining network with node sizes proportional by area to the frequencies of haplotypes. The numbers of mutations separating the haplotypes are shown on the branches, except for the one-step mutations. The little red diamond nodes indicate undetected haplotypes
Pairwise FST among six populations of P. shangchengensis based on mtDNA sequence (below diagonal) and microsatellite data (above diagonal), respectively
| KJY | BYM | TTZ | MW | KHJ | JTX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KJY | 0.119* | 0.293* | 0.252* | 0.520* | 0.590* | |
| BYM | 0.494* | 0.151* | 0.143* | 0.432* | 0.474* | |
| TTZ | 0.927* | 0. 925* | 0.087* | 0.359* | 0.418* | |
| MW | 0.934* | 0. 931* | 0.891* | 0.426* | 0.475* | |
| KHJ | 0.954* | 0. 949* | 0.951* | 0.954* | 0.218* | |
| JTX | 0. 961* | 0.956* | 0.958* | 0.962* | 0.923* |
Note: Significant tests are indicated with an asterisk (*P < 0.01)
Fig. 3STRUCTURE clustering results based on microsatellite genotype data of six P. shangchengensis populations. a The linear relationship between LnP(D) and the number of clusters (K); b ΔK values as a function of K based on 5 runs; c STRUCTURE output for K = 2 and 3
Fig. 4Spatial distribution of each group defined by Geneland for K = 6. a Cluster 1, b Cluster 2, c Cluster 3, d Cluster 4, e Cluster 5, and f Cluster 6. Clusters are indicated by areas with different intensities of color. Lighter-colored areas indicate a higher probability that individuals belong to that cluster
Fig. 5Posterior distributions of the demographic parameters inferred with Msvar of six populations based on microsatellite data (a–f). Estimated posterior distributions of current (N0, blue curve) and ancestral (N1, red curve) effective population sizes and time since population change (T, black curve) on a logarithmic scale based on a generation time of 6 years
Parameters Msvar analysis of each population in P. shangchengensis. Posterior probabilities and 95% highest posterior intervals for the parameters inferred in Msvar
| Population | log10( |
| log10( |
| log10(T) ± SD | T (year) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTX | 3.69 ± 0.22 | 4870 | 4.88 ± 0.05 | 74,989 | 15.40 | 3.80 ± 0.12 | 6310 |
| KHJ | 3.78 ± 0.15 | 5957 | 4.91 ± 0.02 | 81,752 | 13.72 | 3.80 ± 0.32 | 6310 |
| MW | 4.70 ± 0.04 | 50,119 | 4.96 ± 0.06 | 91,725 | 1.83 | 4.95 ± 0.19 | 89,125 |
| TTZ | 4.86 ± 0.08 | 72,862 | 4.73 ± 0.03 | 53,088 | 0.73 | 5.38 ± 0.63 | 237,137 |
| BYM | 4.88 ± 0.03 | 74,989 | 5.09 ± 0.05 | 122,321 | 1.63 | 4.90 ± 0.16 | 79,433 |
| KJY | 4.44 ± 0.13 | 27,384 | 4.81 ± 0.10 | 64,938 | 2.37 | 4.61 ± 0.27 | 40,973 |
N0 current effective population size, N1 historical effective population size, T time of the bottleneck
Fig. 6Ecological niche modeling of P. shangchengensis under (a) Last Inter-glacial conditions, (b) Last Glacial Maximum conditions, (c) Mid Holocene, (d) Current conditions. Location data used for modeling are indicated as yellow dots