| Literature DB >> 36026488 |
Luqman Khalil1, Shujaat Abbas2, Kamil Hussain3, Khalid Zaman4, Hailan Salamun5, Zainudin Bin Hassan6, Muhammad Khalid Anser7,8.
Abstract
Carbon emissions are primarily the result of human activity in urban areas. Inadequate sanitary facilities, contaminated drinking water, nonrenewable energy, and high traffic congestion have all impacted the natural ecosystem. Using data from 1975 to 2019, the study assessed the impact of the aforementioned variables on Pakistan's carbon emissions in light of this crucial fact. The ARDL cointegration method was used to estimate the short- and long-run parameter estimates. Urban sanitation challenges and energy consumption increase carbon emissions, which affects the natural environment by raising a country's carbon intensity. Economic expansion confirmed the inverted U-shaped relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth to verify the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in the long run. In contrast, the monotonically rising function of carbon emissions provides evidence of the nation's economic development in the short run. Access to clean drinking water improves population health and encourages the purchase of eco-friendly products. The government must improve sanitation services and use renewable energy sources to enhance air quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36026488 PMCID: PMC9417191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
List of variables.
| Variables | Symbol | Measurement | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon dioxide emissions | CO2 | kiloton | CO2 emissions are produced when fossil fuels are burned. Solid, liquid, and gaseous fuels are used to make it. |
| Urban sanitation | USAN | % of urban population | The proportion of city dwellers who use sanitation services and have them securely handled. Latrines and flushing to piped sewer systems are also incorporated. |
| Urban access to safe drinking water | UASDW | % of urban population | The proportion of total urban residents who get their drinking water from a higher-quality source with a round-trip delivery time of less than half an hour. Better-quality sources include tube wells, hand pumps, and line pipes. |
| Gross domestic product | INCOME | Current US$ | Throughout the fiscal year, the market value of currently generated products and services offered by all citizens of the country. |
| Energy use | EUSE | kg of oil equivalent per capita | It refers to the use of primary energy prior to its conversion to other end-use fuels. |
| Traffic volume | TVOL | TEU: 20-foot equivalent units | The container port traffic statistics assess the volume of traffic intensity. |
Fig 1Trend analysis of the studied variables.
Source: World Bank [86].
Descriptive statistics.
| Methods | CO2 | EUSE | INCOME | TVOL | UASDW | USAN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 700.061 | 413.699 | 815.350 | 1404729 | 94.898 | 68.220 |
| Maximum | 987.832 | 500.432 | 1197.913 | 3460700 | 95.149 | 76.619 |
| Minimum | 331.783 | 299.104 | 477.967 | 878892 | 94.224 | 65.688 |
| Std. Dev. | 211.862 | 61.047 | 199.867 | 804428.4 | 0.334 | 3.861 |
| Skewness | -0.241 | -0.623 | 0.070 | 1.230 | -0.876 | 1.218 |
| Kurtosis | 1.728 | 1.974 | 2.600 | 3.203 | 2.221 | 2.892 |
Correlation matrix.
| Variables | CO2 | EUSE | INCOME | INCOME2 | TVOL | UASDW | USAN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 1 | ||||||
| EUSE | 0.958 | 1 | |||||
| INCOME | 0.982 | 0.905 | 1 | ||||
| INCOME2 | 0.958 | 0.852 | 0.992 | 1 | |||
| TVOL | 0.779 | 0.584 | 0.855 | 0.910 | 1 | ||
| UASDW | -0.833 | -0.657 | -0.884 | -0.926 | -0.969 | 1 | |
| USAN | 0.772 | 0.568 | 0.846 | 0.897 | 0.982 | -0.978 | 1 |
Note
*** indicates 1% significance level.
ADF unit root estimates.
| Variables | Level | First Difference | Order of Integration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Intercept | both | None | Intercept | Both | ||
| CO2 | 8.132 | -4.638 | ------- | --------- | ----------- | ----- | I(0) |
| EUSE | 3.267 | -2.455 | 0.014 | -4.212 | ----------- | ---- | I(1) |
| INCOME | 6.186 | -1.804 | -2.610 | -1.656 | -5.500 | ------ | I(1) |
| TVOL | 1.528 | 0.261 | -1.575 | -3.692 | -------- | ------ | I(1) |
| UASDW | -3.710*** | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | I(0) |
| USAN | 0.5937 | -3.822*** | ------- | -------- | ------ | ------- | I(0) |
Note
*** and * indicates 1% and 10% level of significance.
ARDL bounds test estimates.
| Test Statistics | Value | Degree of freedom | Variables | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-statistics | 8.272 | 6 | Constant | NA |
|
|
|
| Δln(EU) | 1.370 |
| 10% | 1.75 | 2.87 | Δln(GDP) | 1.102 |
| 5% | 2.04 | 3.24 | Δln(TRAFFIC) | 1.391 |
| 2.5% | 2.32 | 3.59 | Δln(UASDW) | 1.725 |
| 1% | 2.66 | 4.05 | Δln(USAN) | 2.074 |
ARDL short-run estimates.
| Variables | Coefficients | S. Error | t-statistics | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D(USAN) | 10.007 | 3.241 | 3.087 | 0.003 |
| D(UASDW) | -11.775 | 2.438 | -4.828 | 0.000 |
| D(TVOL) | 0.000012 | 0.00002 | 0.596 | 0.554 |
| D(EUSE) | 1.845 | 0.273 | 6.738 | 0.000 |
| D(INCOME) | 0.505 | 0.258 | 1.954 | 0.058 |
| D(INCOME)2 | -0.00019 | 0.00015 | -1.206 | 0.235 |
| CointEq(-1) | -0.889 | 0.097 | -9.141 | 0.000 |
Note: Dependent variable: D (CO2). CointEq(-1) shows error correction term.
ARDL long-run estimates.
| Variables | Coefficients | S. Error | t-Stat. | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INCOME | 0.001458 | 0.000626 | 2.330607 | 0.0253 |
| INCOME2 | -0.000001 | 0.0000004794 | -2.085844 | 0.0439 |
|
| ||||
| EUSE | 2.384174 | 0.476289 | 5.005727 | 0.0000 |
| TVOL | -0.152837 | 0.106540 | -1.434559 | 0.1598 |
| UASDW | -4.199069 | 1.187151 | -3.537097 | 0.0011 |
| USAN | 3.944168 | 1.097968 | 3.592245 | 0.0009 |
|
| ||||
| J.B Test | 1.104 (0.575) | Heteroskedasticity Test | 1.051 (0.418) | |
| Autocorrelation LM Test | 1.223 (0.307) | |||
| Ramsey RESET Test | 1.653 (0.106) | |||
Note: small bracket shows probability value.
Fig 2CUSUM and CUSUM square estimates.
Source: Author’s estimates.