Literature DB >> 35368236

Understanding the dynamics of natural resources rents, environmental sustainability, and sustainable economic growth: new insights from China.

Hafiz Muhammad Arslan1, Irfan Khan1, Muhammad Irfan Latif2, Bushra Komal3, Songsheng Chen4.   

Abstract

There is a close relationship between natural resources and production in many sectors, and production and consumption can also have an environmental impact. Low environmental quality affects economic growth and well-being. Environmental protection and economic growth cannot be maximized simultaneously. Choosing the right balance between the two aims is imperative for each country. By moderating the role of merchandise trade and manufacturing value-added from 1970 to 2016, we examine the dynamics of China's natural resource rents, environmental sustainability, and sustainable economic growth. Overall, the results of this study indicate that natural resources improve environmental sustainability at the expense of economic growth. In contrast, financial development, merchandise trade, and urban population growth promote environmental degradation. It is vital to understand governance mechanisms to sustain natural resource policies, considering environmental, social, and governance concerns to benefit society.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Environmental sustainability; Merchandise trade; Natural resources rents; Sustainable economic growth; Urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35368236     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19952-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   5.190


  3 in total

1.  Alternative energy and natural resources in determining environmental sustainability: a look at the role of government final consumption expenditures in France.

Authors:  Waseem Azam; Irfan Khan; Syed Ahtsham Ali
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  Does income inequality increase the ecological footprint in the US: evidence from FARDL test?

Authors:  Umut Uzar; Kemal Eyuboglu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Sanitation, water, energy use, and traffic volume affect environmental quality: Go-for-green developmental policies.

Authors:  Luqman Khalil; Shujaat Abbas; Kamil Hussain; Khalid Zaman; Hailan Salamun; Zainudin Bin Hassan; Muhammad Khalid Anser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.