Literature DB >> 31627043

Evaluating natural experiments to measure the co-benefits of urban policy interventions to reduce carbon emissions in New Zealand.

Philippa Howden-Chapman1, Michael Keall2, Kate Whitwell3, Ralph Chapman3.   

Abstract

Finding effective policy interventions for addressing the Sustainable Development Goals, such as reducing carbon emissions (SDG 13), which can also enhance good health and wellbeing (SDG 3), is urgent. Many promising interactions occur between sustainable cities and communities (SDG 11), clean water and sanitation (SDG 6) and affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), which sit at the centre of integrated urban planning and regeneration. In this paper, we consider the framing and findings of four policies we have evaluated as natural experiments, all of which have important co-benefits, which were not always the focus of the initial policies. These policies are: the installation of cycleways and walkways in existing suburbs; a central government measure to recentralise employment after the 2011 Christchurch earthquakes; the streamlining of housing developments by reducing land-use regulation; and ongoing changes of policy about public housing investment. We show that having a clear understanding of the benefits of increased physical activity for health, for example, could accelerate the reduction of carbon emissions. Also, decisions about infrastructure, housing and job locations can generate health and environmental gains if supported by broader public transport investments. Cycling and walking are also more likely to substitute for short habitual car trips. Similarly, measuring the co-benefits of differential residential models, relating to land-use and renewable energy, provides a framework that can facilitate learning from policy interventions, enabling wider and potentially more rapid generalisation of policies, including those for climate change mitigation.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change mitigation; Co-benefits; Cycling; Housing; Natural experiments; SDGs; Urban policy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31627043     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Urban environmental health interventions towards the Sustainable Development Goals.

Authors:  Sotiris Vardoulakis; Jennifer Salmond; Thomas Krafft; Lidia Morawska
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Co-Benefits Analysis of Buildings Based on Different Renewal Strategies: The Emergy-Lca Approach.

Authors:  Wenjing Cui; Jingke Hong; Guiwen Liu; Kaijian Li; Yuanyuan Huang; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Sanitation, water, energy use, and traffic volume affect environmental quality: Go-for-green developmental policies.

Authors:  Luqman Khalil; Shujaat Abbas; Kamil Hussain; Khalid Zaman; Hailan Salamun; Zainudin Bin Hassan; Muhammad Khalid Anser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.