| Literature DB >> 36010415 |
Piyush Baindara1, Santi M Mandal2.
Abstract
Food spoilage is a widespread issue brought on by the undesired growth of microbes in food products. Thousands of tons of usable food or food products are wasted every day due to rotting in different parts of the world. Several food preservation techniques are employed to prevent food from rotting, including the use of natural or manufactured chemicals or substances; however, the issue persists. One strategy for halting food deterioration is the use of plant-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which have been investigated for possible bioactivities against a range of human, plant, and food pathogens. The food industry may be able to benefit from the development of synthetic AMPs, produced from plants that have higher bioactivity, better stability, and decreased cytotoxicity as a means of food preservation. In order to exploit plant-derived AMPs in various food preservation techniques, in this review, we also outline the difficulties in developing AMPs for use as commercial food preservatives. Nevertheless, as technology advances, it will soon be possible to fully explore the promise of plant-derived AMPs as food preservatives.Entities:
Keywords: food preservatives; food spoilage; foodborne pathogens; peptide micelles; plant antimicrobial peptides
Year: 2022 PMID: 36010415 PMCID: PMC9407122 DOI: 10.3390/foods11162415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Selected plant defensins that showed potential antimicrobial activities for food preservation: J1 (predicted in this study), Rs-AFP1 (PDB ID: 1AYJ), PaDef (predicted in this study), and Cp-thionin II (predicted in this study). Predicted structures are modeled via homology modeling using the Swiss model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org accessed on 30 July 2022).
Figure 2Selected 2S albumin proteins that have potential antimicrobial activities for food preservation: Pa-AFP1 (predicted in this study) and Pe-AFP1 (predicted in this study). Predicted structures are modeled via homology modeling using the Swiss model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org accessed on 30 July 2022).
Figure 3Selected glycine-rich, lipid transfer, and snakin proteins that showed potential antimicrobial activities for food preservation: Pg-AMP1 (predicted in this study), Ha-AP10 (predicted in this study), and snakin-1 (PDB ID: 5E5Q). Predicted structures are modeled via homology modeling using the Swiss model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org accessed on 30 July 2022).
Figure 4Selected napin (A) and knottin-like (B) plant AMPs that have potential antimicrobial activities for food preservation: Cn-AMP1 (PDB ID: 2N0V), PAFS-S (PDB ID: 1DKC), and Mj-AMP1 (predicted in this study). Predicted structures are modeled via homology modeling using the Swiss model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org accessed on 30 July 2022).
Different classes of plant-derived AMPs, sources, and antimicrobial activity.
| Class | Name | Source | Antimicrobial Activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensins | PaDef | Avocado |
| [ |
| J1 | Fruit peppers |
| [ | |
| Rs-AFP1 | Radish |
| [ | |
| IbAMP1 | Touch me not |
| [ | |
| Cp-thionin II | Black-eyed pea |
| [ | |
| MsDef1 | Alfalfa |
| [ | |
| MtDef4 | Barrelclover |
| [ | |
| 2S Albumins | Pa-AFP1 | Passion fruit |
| [ |
| Pe-AFP1 | Passion fruit |
| [ | |
| Pf2 | Passion fruit |
| [ | |
| CW-1 | Cheeseweed |
| [ | |
|
Glycine-rich | Pg-AMP1 | Guava seeds | [ | |
|
Lipid transfer | Ca-LTP1 | Chili pepper |
| [ |
| Ha-AP10 | Sunflower |
| [ | |
| Mung bean | Black gram |
| [ | |
| Snakins | Snakin-Z | Jujube fruits |
| [ |
| Snakin-1 | Potato | Antifungal, anti-yeast, and antibacterial | [ | |
| MsSN1 | Alfalfa |
| [ | |
| Thionins | CaThi | Chili pepper |
| [ |
| Wheat | Wheat |
| [ | |
| Thionin 2.4 |
|
| [ | |
| Tu-AMP1 | Garden tulip |
| [ | |
| Cyclotides | Cycloviolacin O2 | Sweet violet |
| [ |
|
α-Hairpinin-like | LuffinP1 | Sponge gourd | Translational inhibitory activity | [ |
|
Hevein-like | Bleogen pB1 | Cactus | Anti- | [ |
| EAFP1 |
|
| [ | |
| Ee-CBP | Spindle |
| [ | |
| SmAMP3 | Chickweed |
| [ | |
| Napins | Em2-F18 | Jambu fruit |
| [ |
| Tn-AFP1 | Water chestnut |
| [ | |
| Cn-AMP1 | Green coconut |
| [ | |
| Cn-AMP2 | Green coconut |
| [ | |
|
Knottin- | PAFP-S | Pokeweed | [ | |
| Mj-AMP1 | Four o’clock flower |
| [ | |
| Unclassified AMPs | Cn-AMP3 | Green coconut |
| [ |
Figure 5Selected α-Hairpin-like peptide (A) and hevein-like peptides (B) that have potential antimicrobial activities for food preservation: LuffnP1 (PDB ID: 2L37) and Bleogen (PDB ID: 5XBD).
Application of plant AMPs as food preservatives in the food industry.
| Name | Source | Target Organisms | Mechanism of Action | Application in Food Preservation | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycinin basic peptide (GBP) | Soybean | Disruption of the plasma membrane, inhibition of mycelial growth, and spore germination | Fresh wet noodles | [ | |
| Glycinin basic polypeptides (GBPs) | Soybean | Bacteria | Inhibit the bacterial growth | Japanese Spanish Mackerel fish | [ |
| Nine native peptide mixtures | A mixture of pea, lentil, and fava bean flours | Inhibition of the fungal conidia germination | Wheat bread | [ | |
| Palm kernel cake peptide mixture | Palm kernel cake | Disruption of the plasma membrane by increased permeability | Whole wheat bread slices | [ | |
| Ac-AMP2 |
|
| Inhibition of spore germination | Post harvested pears | [ |
| Ala-Tyr peptide | Maize | Bacteria | Inhibition of bacterial growth | Atlantic mackerel fish | [ |
|
|
| Disruption of bacterial cell membrane | Minced meat products | [ | |
| Snakin-1 |
|
| Disruption of the plasma membrane by increased permeabilization | Fanta orange, cranberry, and apple juice | [ |
Figure 6Different scientific technologies for the stability and production improvement of raw, processed, and liquid food, using plant AMPs.
Figure 7Different applications of plant AMPs in raw, processed, and liquid food.
Pros and cons of plant AMPs, in terms of their development for application in the food industry.
| Pros | Cons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Plant AMPs have enormous structural and functional diversity. | 1. | The chemical synthesis of AMPs is expensive. |
| 2. | Plant AMPs show diverse mechanisms of action with multiple broad-spectrum bioactivities. | 2. | Some plant-derived AMPs show cytotoxicity against different cells. |
| 3. | Hundreds of plant AMPs are already available and enormous scope to find out many more. | 3. | Purified plant-derived AMPs show low stability. |
| 4. | AMPs can be easily bioengineered. | 4. | Generally, AMPs are immunogenic due to their large size. |
| 5. | Plant AMPs can be used in combination with other food preservatives. | 5. | Large-scale production of AMPs is not feasible in the present scenario. |