Literature DB >> 3599326

Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses.

R M Battle, D Pathak, C G Humble, C R Key, P R Vanatta, R B Hill, R E Anderson.   

Abstract

A study of 2067 autopsies collected from 32 university and community hospitals of various sizes located throughout the United States showed the rate of discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses to be influenced by the type and size of hospital, the age and sex of the patient, and the disease responsible for the patient's death. Of equivocal or no influence were the length of the terminal hospitalization, the degree of clinical involvement in the case of the person responsible for establishing the discrepancy level, and the autopsy rate, at least as it applies to community hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3599326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  41 in total

1.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Age and the treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  J S Brown; D Eraut; C Trask; A G Davison
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Missed diagnosis in hematological patients-an autopsy study.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Galtarossa Xavier; Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira; Luciano José Megale Costa; Thais Mauad; Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates.

Authors:  K G Shojania; E C Burton; K M McDonald; L Goldman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

6.  The accuracy of death certificates. Implications for health statistics.

Authors:  G P Nielsen; J Björnsson; J G Jonasson
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1991

7.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Deaths and necropsies in a thoracic unit.

Authors:  D A Boldy; C Jones; H Matthews; C Edwards
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; S E Shirley; C T Escoffery; M Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Tuberculosis surveillance using death certificate data, New York City, 1992.

Authors:  R M Washko; T R Frieden
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.