Literature DB >> 8497830

Deaths and necropsies in a thoracic unit.

D A Boldy1, C Jones, H Matthews, C Edwards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is concern about the decrease in the number of requests for necropsies, so a study was undertaken to assess current clinical practice.
METHOD: A prospective study was made of all deaths occurring under the care of five chest physicians and three thoracic surgeons at East Birmingham Hospital from 1 April to 30 June 1989.
RESULTS: A necropsy was sought in 34 of 58 deaths (59%) and was performed in 22 instances (38%). Major unexpected findings which would have affected clinical management were noted in three patients (14%). The mean delay in reporting results of histological examinations was 146 days (range 41-260 days). As the result of an increase in pathology technical staff levels and alteration in the practice of processing histological data, there was a substantial improvement during the corresponding period in 1990 (mean reduction 58 days, 95% confidence limits 39-77 days). Apart from patients with histologically proved carcinoma, there was no consistent pattern for requests for necropsies.
CONCLUSIONS: Necropsies continue to reveal diagnoses which were not suspected while the patient was alive. Although the number of requests made by clinical staff for necropsies is reasonable, the reasons for the requests are not consistent. Guidelines are suggested to improve the number of successful requests and to maximise the information obtained from them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8497830      PMCID: PMC464372          DOI: 10.1136/thx.48.3.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital.

Authors:  C S Landefeld; M M Chren; A Myers; R Geller; S Robbins; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cost effectiveness of routine postmortem histology.

Authors:  W A Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Future of the hospital autopsy.

Authors:  H M Cameron
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1988-11

4.  Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy.

Authors:  M Britton
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1974-09

5.  Necropsies in the elderly.

Authors:  J A Puxty; M A Horan; R A Fox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-06-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The ultimate audit.

Authors:  G Gau
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-18

7.  Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan; H Watson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-11

8.  A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses.

Authors:  R M Battle; D Pathak; C G Humble; C R Key; P R Vanatta; R B Hill; R E Anderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Correlation of clinical phenotype to genotype in haemoglobin H disease.

Authors:  C Kattamis; S Tzotzos; E Kanavakis; J Synodinos; A Metaxotou-Mavrommati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Acp. Best practice no 155. Pathological investigation of deaths following surgery, anaesthesia, and medical procedures.

Authors:  R D Start; S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Factors predicting cases with unexpected clinical findings at necropsy.

Authors:  I A Robinson; N J Marley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.