Literature DB >> 15711985

Missed diagnosis in hematological patients-an autopsy study.

Ana Carolina Galtarossa Xavier1, Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira, Luciano José Megale Costa, Thais Mauad, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva.   

Abstract

Autopsy findings of missed diagnoses that would probably have changed management or prognosis occur in up to 29% of cases in general hospitals. Such proportions may be higher in subsets of patients with complex diseases. We reviewed 2908 consecutive autopsies performed over a period of 29 months in a large-volume hospital, analyzing 118 autopsies of patients with hematological malignancies or severe aplastic anemia. A review of macroscopic reports as well as microscopic examination of tissue samples was performed. Medical records were reviewed for clinical diagnoses. Discordances between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were classified using Goldman's criteria. Additionally, we searched for clinical parameters correlated with occurrence of class-I discrepancy using a multivariate method. Median age was 46.5 years, and 25.4% had received a hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Overall, 11.9% (6.6-19.1%) of patients died before conclusion of the hematological diagnosis and 33% (24.6-42.3%) died with no active hematological disease. We found class-I discrepancy in 31.3% (23.1-40.5 %) of cases. The most common among these diagnoses were hematological disease, pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding. In a univariate analysis, being elderly (P=0.04) was positively correlated with the finding of class-I discrepancies; while, having received previous specific hematological treatment (P=0.0005) or hematopoietic stem-cell transplants (P=0.013), or being admitted to a specialized hematology unit (P=0.0006) were negatively correlated to the occurrence of such discrepancies. Multivariate analysis showed that care in a specialized hematology unit (OR 0.34, 0.12-0.93) was independently associated with lower occurrence of discrepancies. We concluded that critical diagnoses are often missed in highly complex hematological patients especially in the absence of admission to specialized hematology units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711985     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-004-1186-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  31 in total

Review 1.  Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Elizabeth C Burton; Kathryn M McDonald; Lee Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Reflections on the postmortem audit.

Authors:  H H Friederici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Resurrecting the autopsy: benefits and recommendations.

Authors:  P N Nemetz; C M Beard; D J Ballard; J Ludwig; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen; K M Weigel; P G Belau; W M Bourne; L T Kurland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Autopsy: moribund art or vital science?

Authors:  S J McPhee; K Bottles
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Autopsies in a modern teaching hospital. A review of 2,537 cases.

Authors:  H H Friederici; M Sebastian
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 6.  Oncologic emergencies.

Authors:  K M Kelly; B Lange
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.278

7.  Age and the declining rate of autopsy.

Authors:  E W Campion; V A Reder; A G Mulley; G E Thibault
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Age trends in autopsy rates. Striking decline in late life.

Authors:  J C Ahronheim; A S Bernholc; W D Clark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses.

Authors:  R M Battle; D Pathak; C G Humble; C R Key; P R Vanatta; R B Hill; R E Anderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect?

Authors:  E C Burton; D A Troxclair; W P Newman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Histological examination has a major impact on macroscopic necropsy diagnoses.

Authors:  F D C Bernardi; P H N Saldiva; T Mauad
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of infectious diseases in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: an autopsy study.

Authors:  Ashrit Multani; Libby S Allard; Tamna Wangjam; R Alejandro Sica; David J Epstein; Andrew R Rezvani; Dora Y Ho
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-26

3.  Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Fabiana Kotovicz; Thais Mauad; Paulo H N Saldiva
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.