| Literature DB >> 35956563 |
Norfatirah Muhamad Sarih1, Nuur Syuhada Dzulkafly1, Simon Maher2, Azura A Rashid1.
Abstract
Glove tear or perforation is a common occurrence during various activities that require gloves to be worn, posing a significant risk to the wearer and possibly others. This is vitally important in a clinical environment and particularly during surgical procedures. When a glove perforation occurs (and is noticed), the glove must be replaced as soon as possible; however, it is not always noticeable. The present article is focused on the design and development of a novel fluorescence-based sensing mechanism, which is integrated within the glove topology, to help alert the wearer of a perforation in situ. We hypothesized that natural rubber gloves with curcumin infused would yield fluorescence when the glove is damaged, particularly when torn or punctured. The glove design is based on double-dipping between Natural Rubber Latex (NRL) and an inner layer of latex mixed with curcumin, which results in a notable bright yellow-green emission when exposed to UV light. Curcumin (Cur) is a phenolic chemical found primarily in turmeric that fluoresces yellowish-green at 525 nm. The tear region on the glove will glow, indicating the presence of a Cur coating/dipping layer beneath. NRL film is modified by dipping it in a Cur dispersion solution mixed with NRL for the second dipping layer. Using Cur as a filler in NRL also has the distinct advantage of allowing the glove to be made stronger by evenly distributing it throughout the rubber phase. Herein, the optimized design is fully characterized, including physicochemical (fluorescence emission) and mechanical (tensile and tear tests) properties, highlighting the clear potential of this novel and low-cost approach for in situ torn glove detection.Entities:
Keywords: curcumin; fluorescence-based sensor; natural rubber latex; surgical gloves; torn glove detection; wearable sensor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956563 PMCID: PMC9370823 DOI: 10.3390/polym14153048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1The keto-enol tautomeric structure of curcumin.
Dwell time of LC film samples and their thickness.
| Samples | Dwell Time | Thickness (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRL (44%) | NRL-Cur (26%) | MEAN (±SD) | |
|
| 10_10 | 5_5 | 0.22 (2.78 × 10−17) |
|
| 10_10 | 5 | 0.21 (2.78 × 10−17) |
|
| 10_5_10 | 5_5 | 0.24 (4.90 × 10−3) |
|
| 10_5_10 | 5 | 0.23 (4.00 × 10−3) |
|
| 15_15 | 5_5 | 0.24 (8.94 × 10−3) |
|
| 15_15 | 5 | 0.23 (4.90 × 10−3) |
|
| 15_5_15 | 5_5 | 0.26 (4.90 × 103) |
|
| 15_5_15 | 5 | 0.25 (4.30 × 103) |
|
| 15_15 | 10_5_10 | 0.26 (0.00) |
|
| 15_15 | 10_10 | 0.25 (4.71 × 10−3) |
|
| 10_10 | 0.15 (0.00) | |
L = NRL film, LC = double coating of NRL with NRL-Cur film, Dwell time = 10_10 means 10 s dip in, and 10 s take out, while 10_5_10 means 10 s dip in, 5 s hold and 10 s take out, (±SD) = Standard Deviation.
Figure 2Flow chart of optimised LC films post-processing process.
Figure 3Photograph of LC films for solid sample fluorescence analysis (a) film under visible light, (b) film under UV light.
Mechanical properties of LC films before leaching.
| Samples | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Tear Strength (N/mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (±SD) | Mean (±SD) | |
|
| 19.10 (0.96) | 40.55 (10.15) |
|
| 18.09 (0.69) | 45.78 (9.49) |
|
| 18.82 (1.76) | 40.13 (7.87) |
|
| 18.96 (1.76) | 41.25 (8.60) |
|
| 19.14 (0.73) | 41.72 (1.66) |
|
| 19.13 (1.47) | 44.23 (9.51) |
|
| 18.67 (0.81) | 39.84 (4.23) |
|
| 18.31 (0.77) | 43.05 (14.41) |
|
| 20.10 (0.45) | 39.97 (13.08) |
|
| 18.35 (0.55) | 40.20 (3.19) |
|
| 17.92 (0.17) | 37.73 (6.14) |
L = NRL film, LC = double coating of NRL with NRL-Cur film, (±SD) = Standard Deviation.
Figure 4The maximum fluorescence intensity of each sample at emission wavelength 489 nm (LC = latex (without torn), LT = torn latex, C = control (i.e., without any tear), T = torn on the film.
Mechanical properties of LC1, LC3 and LC7 film post-processing (wet-gel leaching, dry-gel leaching, and wet and dry-gel leaching).
| Leaching Conditions | LC1 | LC3 | LC7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile (MPa) | Tear (N/mm) | Tensile (MPa) | Tear (N/mm) | Tensile (MPa) | Tear (N/mm) | |
| Unleached | 19.10 | 40.55 | 18.82 | 41.72 | 18.67 | 39.84 |
| Wet | 21.23 | 52.02 | 23.36 | 54.15 | 21.98 | 57.91 |
| Dry | 21.60 | 53.86 | 23.04 | 54.30 | 21.09 | 55.49 |
| Wet + Dry | 21.90 | 58.60 | 23.81 | 65.47 | 22.74 | 63.85 |
L = NRL film, LC = double coating of NRL with NRL-Cur film.
Figure 5The fluorescence intensity of each sample after leaching at emission wavelength 510 nm.
Images of LC1, LC3, and LC7 torn film before and after leaching.
| LC Films | Without Leaching | Wet Leaching | Dry Leaching | Wet-Dry Leaching |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 6FTIR spectrum of (a) curcumin, (b) LC and (c) NRL.
Figure 7(a) TGA and (b) derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves of NRL and LC.
The thermal stability comparison of NRL and LC.
| Type of Film | T5% (°C) | T50% (°C) | T75% (°C) | Total Weight Loss (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRL | 211.92 | 387.92 | 405.92 | 96.329 |
|
| 336.92 | 388.92 | 403.92 | 100 |