Literature DB >> 17605178

The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.

K Y Chan1, V A Singh, B H Oun, B H Se To.   

Abstract

Glove perforation during surgery has always been a matter of concern as it increases the infection rate and the risk of transmission of blood borne diseases. To determine the common causes, the site and the awareness of glove perforations in orthopaedic surgery, a prospective study was conducted to assess the rate of glove perforation during 130 consecutive orthopaedic operations. All gloves worn by the surgical team were assessed after the surgery using the water-loading test. A total of 1452 gloves were tested, and the rate of perforation was 3.58%. Most of these perforations (61.5%) were unnoticed. The main surgeons had the most perforations (76.9%), followed by first assistants (13.5%) and second assistants (9.6%). Most perforations occurred at the non-dominant hand. The commonest site of perforation was the index finger followed by the thumb. Shearing force with instruments accounted for 45% of the noticed perforations. Majority of these occurred during nailing procedures (33%) and internal fixation without the use of wires (19%). Our rate of glove perforation is similar to other series. Most of them went unnoticed and were mainly due to shearing injuries rather than perforation by sharps. Therefore, there is an increased risk of contamination and break in asepsis during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17605178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Malaysia        ISSN: 0300-5283


  8 in total

1.  Glove perforation rate with orthopedic gloving versus double gloving technique in tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Kimberly Egeler; Nicole Stephenson; Natasha Stanke
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  CORR Insights®: High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.

Authors:  Ronald W Lindsey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Knot tying in arthroplasty and arthroscopy causes lesions to surgical gloves: a potential risk of infection.

Authors:  Andreas Enz; Annett Klinder; Lucas Bisping; Christoph Lutter; Philipp Warnke; Thomas Tischer; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Robert Lenz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.

Authors:  Ashton H Goldman; Emanuel Haug; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Gregory J Golladay
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Prospective data collection and analysis of perforations and tears of latex surgical gloves during primary endoprosthetic surgeries.

Authors:  Sarah Zaatreh; Andreas Enz; Annett Klinder; Tony König; Lena Mittelmeier; Günther Kundt; Wolfram Mittelmeier
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2016-12-20

6.  A Cross-sectional Analysis of Glove Perforation in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Kumar; K Shantanu; M Kumar; A Kumar; V Sharma
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2016-11

7.  Wearable Natural Rubber Latex Gloves with Curcumin for Torn Glove Detection in Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Norfatirah Muhamad Sarih; Nuur Syuhada Dzulkafly; Simon Maher; Azura A Rashid
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.967

8.  Reducing surgical site infection in arthroplasty of the lower limb: A multi-disciplinary approach.

Authors:  R Johnson; S S Jameson; R D Sanders; N J Sargant; S D Muller; R M D Meek; M R Reed
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.