| Literature DB >> 35955963 |
Patrícia Moreira1,2, Patrícia Matos2,3,4, Artur Figueirinha2,3,4, Lígia Salgueiro2,4, Maria Teresa Batista4, Pedro Costa Branco5, Maria Teresa Cruz1,2, Cláudia Fragão Pereira1,6.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder affecting elderly people worldwide. Currently, there are no effective treatments for AD able to prevent disease progression, highlighting the urgency of finding new therapeutic strategies to stop or delay this pathology. Several plants exhibit potential as source of safe and multi-target new therapeutic molecules for AD treatment. Meanwhile, Eucalyptus globulus extracts revealed important pharmacological activities, namely antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which can contribute to the reported neuroprotective effects. This review summarizes the chemical composition of essential oil (EO) and phenolic extracts obtained from Eucalyptus globulus leaves, disclosing major compounds and their effects on AD-relevant pathological features, including deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) in senile plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau in neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), abnormalities in GABAergic, cholinergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission, inflammation, and oxidative stress. In general, 1,8-cineole is the major compound identified in EO, and ellagic acid, quercetin, and rutin were described as main compounds in phenolic extracts from Eucalyptus globulus leaves. EO and phenolic extracts, and especially their major compounds, were found to prevent several pathological cellular processes and to improve cognitive function in AD animal models. Therefore, Eucalyptus globulus leaves are a relevant source of biological active and safe molecules that could be used as raw material for nutraceuticals and plant-based medicinal products useful for AD prevention and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; essential oil; eucalyptus; phenolic extracts
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955963 PMCID: PMC9369093 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Chemical components present at ≥2%, of the essential oils from Eucalyptus globulus leaves.
| Origin | Compounds | Source | Extraction | Yield (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algeria |
1,8-cineole (78.5 %), | Fresh leaves | Steam distillation | 0.96 | [ |
|
1,8-cineole (71.3 %), α-pinene (8.8%), | Fresh leaves | Steam distillation | 1.10 | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (55.3%), isovaleraldehyde (10.0%), spathulenol (7.4%), α-terpineol (5.5%), α-pinene (4.6%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.53 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (51.1%), α-pinene (24.6%), | Fresh leaves | Steam distillation | 0.96 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (48.6%), globulol (10.9%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.50 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (47.1%), globulol (8.7%), α-pinene (7.7%), α-terpinene (3.6%), | Dry leaves | Steam distillation | - | [ | |
| γ-terpinene (94.5%), 1,8-cineole (3.2%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 3.50 | [ | |
| Argentina | 1,8-cineole (98.9%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (90.7%), α-pinene (4.1%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.68 | [ | |
|
a
1,8-cineole (77.9%), α-terpineol (6.0%), α-pinene (5.8%), γ-terpinene (4.8%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.25 | [ | |
| b 1,8-cineole (76.7%), α-pinene (11.1%), α-terpineol acetate (4.0%) | 1.66 | ||||
| 1,8-cineole (76.7%), limonene (18.9%) | Leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| Australia | 1,8-cineole (90.0%), α-pinene (2.2%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (86.3%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (79.4%), α-pinene (3.7%), α-terpineol (3.0%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (77.0%), limonene (7.5%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (64.4%), limonene (5%), α-pinene (3.8%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (51.0%), α-pinene (16.7%), limonene (6.2%), globulol (7.3%) | Leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| Belgium |
1,8-cineole (80.4%), limonene, (7.5%), γ-terpinene (3.7%), | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| Brazil | 1,8-cineole (90.0%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (90.0%), tricyclene (3.0%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (83.9%), limonene (8.2%), α-pinene (4.2%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (83.7%), limonene (6.4%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (78.9%), limonene (8.5%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (77.5%), α-pinene (14.2%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 3.10 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (75.7%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (71.0%), α-pinene (8.3%), α-guaiene (4.8%), globulol (3.5%), | Dry leaves | Steam distillation | 1.33 | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (69.3%), camphene (9.4%), α-pinene (7.5%), α-terpineol (5.1%), globulol (2.7%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.60 | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (68.3%), α-pinene (16.2%), α-terpineol (6.4%), limonene (3.0%) | Dry leaves | Steam distillation | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (64.3%), α-pinene (8.9%), α-terpineol (7.2%), globulol (4.8%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.60 | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (61.3%), camphenene (12.6%), α-pinene (5.8%), limonene (4.1%), vidiflorol (3.1%), aromadrendene (2.8%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.50 | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (49.0%), camphenene (8.9%), globulol (7.0%), aromadendrene (2.3%), α-terpineol (2.0%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 0.60 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (44.7%), α-pinene (14.3%), globulol (9.2%), aromadendrene (7.3%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| Cameroon |
1.8-cineole (26.4%), α-pinene (14.1%), | Fresh leaves | Steam distillation | 1.00 | [ |
| Chile | 1,8-cineole (82.6%), α-pinene (9.5%), m-mentha-6.8-diene (4.7%) | Leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (76.0%), α-pinene (7.4%), aromadendrene (3.6%), silvestrene (2.8%), sabinene (2.0%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| China | 1,8-cineole (94.3%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
|
1,8-cineole (39.2%), α-terpineol acetate (13.8%), α-terpineol (11.3%), α-pinene (11.3%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| Columbia | 1,8-cineole (52.3%), α-pinene (15.3%), α-terpineol (9.8%), globulol (7.6%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.50 | [ |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1,8-cineole (44.3%), camphene (23.1%), α-pinene (9.3%), globulol (7.3%), limonene (5.1%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.87 | [ |
| Ecuador | 1,8-cineole (52.6%), α-pinene (20.0%), α-phellandrene (6.2%), α-terpinyl acetate (3.7%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| Egypt |
1,8-cineole (46.8%), limonene (9.6%), tolueno (8.6%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
|
1,8-cineole (21.4%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 0.40 | [ | |
| Ethiopia |
1,8-cineole (81.6%), α-pinene (2.8%), cuminaldehyde (2.8%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (63.0%), α-pinene (16.1%), camphor (3.4%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (57.5%), α-pinene (15.2%), limonene (7.8%), α-terpinyl acetate (5.3%), α-terpineol (2.0%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.10 | [ | |
| France |
1,8-cineole (57.9%), α-pinene (13.9%), globulol (3.6%), | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| Germany | 1,8-cineole (86.5%), α-pinene (4.7%), γ-terpinene (2.6%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| India | 1,8-cineole (85.0%), α-pinene (3.0%) | Commercial | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (71.7%), α-pinene (9.14%), α-terpineol acetate (3.6%), alloaromadendrene (2.4%), α-terpineol (2.2%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (71.6%), 3-carene (15.1%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (68.8%), α-pinene (2.8%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (54.8%), β-pinene (18.5%), α-pinene (11.5%), β-eudesmol (4.7%), α-phellandrene (2.1%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.10 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (66.3%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (33.6%), α-pinene (14.2%), limonene (10.1%), α-terpinolene (6%), α-terpineol (4.7%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (45.4%), limonene (17.8%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 0.90 | [ | ||
| cymene (26.4%), β-pinene (15.2%), eudesmol (11.4%), α-pinene (10.6%), 1-phellandrene (10.3%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.00 | [ | |
| Iran | 1,8-cineole (88.0%), α-pinene (2.2%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (58.1%), α-phellandrene (6.0%), neo-isodihydrocarveol (3.6%), α-pinene (3.3%), α-eudesmol (3.2%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| Italy | 1,8-cineole (95.5%), α-pinene (2.5%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
|
1,8-cineole (91.5%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (89.8%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (84.9%), α-pinene (5.6%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (81.4%), limonene (7.0%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (76.0%), α-pinene (6.6%), limonene (5.7%), α-terpineol (3.1%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (48.2%), aromadendrene (13.7%), guaiol (7.6%), α-pinene (6.9%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.00 | [ | |
| Kenya | 1,8-cineole (79.6%), α-pinene (6.9%), α-terpineol (3.8%), limonene (2.7%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (17.2%), α-pinene (7.1%), spathulenol (6.5%), cryptone (5.4%), isoborneol (2.5%) | Fresh leaves | Steam distillation | - | [ | |
| Montenegro | 1,8-cineole (85.8%), α-pinene (7.2%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.80 | [ |
| Morocco |
1,8-cineole (80.0%), limonene (6.7%), | Dry leaves | Steam distillation | 2.70 | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (70.6%), α-pinene (12.9%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 0.60 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (29.5%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.20 | [ | |
| Commercial | - | - | [ | ||
| Pakistan | 1,8-cineole (56.5%), limonene (28.0%), α-pinene (4.2%) α-terpineol, (4.0%), globulol (2.4%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.89 | [ |
|
β-phellandrene (32.1%), 1,8-cineole (26.6%), α-pinene (16.8%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.10 | [ | |
| Portugal | 1,8-cineole (74.6%), α-pinene (12.9%), metileugenol (3.5%), globulol (3.2%), terpinen-4-ol (2.0%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (62.5%), α-pinene (18.5%), limonene (4.0%) aromadendrene (3.1%), δ-cadinene (2.9%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.90–2.70 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (36.7%), β-pinene (9.3%), aromedendrene (6.3%), globulol (5.1%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 2.67 | [ | |
| Slovakia | 1,8-cineole (70.0%), limonene (12.0%), α-pinene (9.0%) | Leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ |
| South Africa | 1,8-cineole (80.8%), limonene (8.0%), γ-terpinene (2.8%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| Spain | 1,8-cineole (84.3%), cymene (7.5%), γ-terpinene (3.5%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
|
1,8-cineole (63.8%), α-pinene (16.1%), aromadendrene (3.7%), | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
| Switzerland |
1,8-cineole (88.0%), | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| Thailand |
1,8-cineole (82.6%), limonene (7.4%), | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (48.5%), α-pinene (20.6%), β-pinene (15.5%), terpineol (15.4%) | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | - | [ | |
| Tunisia | 1,8-cineole (95.6%) | Commercial | - | - | [ |
| 1,8-cineole (62.8%), 4-methyl-2-pentyl acetate (22.3%), α-pinene (8.8%), caryophyllene (2.5%), β-humulene (2.4%) | Commercial | - | - | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (53.8%), α-pinene (12.1%), globulol (4.5%), | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 3.80 | [ | |
|
1,8-cineole (48.2%), α-pinene (16.1%), γ-terpinene (8.9%), | Fresh leaves | Hydrodistillation | 0.74 | [ | |
| 1,8-cineole (43.2%), α-pinene (13.6%), aromadendrene (10.1%), 4-carene (6.9%), β-cymene (4.0%) | Dry leaves | Hydrodistillation | 1.25 | [ | |
| Fresh leaves | Steam distillation | - | [ | ||
| USA |
1,8-cineole (90.0%), | Commercial | - | - | [ |
aE. globulus ssp. maidenii; b E. globulus ssp. globulus.
Phenolic compounds from Eucalyptus globulus leaves extracts.
| Origin |
Compounds * |
Total Phenolic Content | Source | Extraction |
Yield | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algeria | Sideroxylonal (1902.39), ellagic acid (284.30), methylellagic acid hexose (174.88), eucalbanine (113.13), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (108.43) | - | Dry leaves | 70% Acetone and 0.5% acetic acid | 24.70 | [ |
| Australia | Hyperoside (66.64), quercetin (28.78), myricetin (9.23), rutin (4.87), isoquercetin (3.90) | 235.87 a | Dry leaves | 70% Ethanol at 60 °C | - | [ |
| Chile | Luteolin (260.00), quercetin (250.00), morin (170.00), sinapic acid (170.00), ellagic acid (60.00) | 0.043 b | Fresh leaves | Methanol | - | [ |
| Gallic acid (2175.00), gentisic acid (1358.33), rutin (456.83), caffeic acid (351.67), 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (34.33) | 54.02 c | Dry leaves | Water at 100 °C | [ | ||
| China | Rutin, isorhamnetin-hexoside, isorhamnetin-rhamnoside | - | Dry leaves | Methanol at 45 °C | 10.50 | [ |
| Egypt |
Isorhamnetin 3- | - | Dry leaves | Methanol | 14.67 | [ |
| Greece | - | Dry leaves | 62.5% Methanol and HCl at 90 °C | - | [ | |
| India |
Gallic acid (8.62), ellagic acid (6.58), vanillic acid (4.89), | 242.50 c | Dry leaves | Methanol | - | [ |
|
Gallic acid (5.36), ellagic acid (4.20), | 156.30 c | Chloroform | ||||
|
Gallic acid (3.08), | 98.70 c | Hexane | ||||
| Rutin (113.20), quercetin (44.00), ferulic acid (6.66), gallic acid (3.00), caffeic acid (1.40) | 40.10 c | Dry leaves | 80% Methanol and 5.5% HCl at 85 °C | - | [ | |
| Lithuania | Chlorogenic acid, phlorizin, rutin, quinic acid, isoquercetin | - | Dry leaves | 70% Methanol | - | [ |
| Chlorogenic acid, phlorizin, rutin, quinic acid, isoquercetin | - | 70% Acetone | ||||
| Chlorogenic acid, phlorizin, quinic acid, quercetin, apigenin | - | 70% Ethanol | ||||
| Portugal | Flavonol glycoside (234.52), chlorogenic acid (106.91), rutin (105.71), ellagic acid (63.81), quercetin (57.38) | 311.00 c | Dry leaves | Water at 40 °C | 23.80 | [ |
| Spain |
Hyperoside (29.09), chlorogenic acid (17.54), rutin (16.64), quercetin (6.30), | - | Dry leaves | Water | 9.69 | [ |
| USA | Gallic acid (132.90) | - | Dry leaves | 50% Methanol | 30.00 | [ |
* Only the five major compounds from highest to lowest concentration are shown in the table; a value expressed in dry weight plant material; b value expressed in fresh weight plant material; c value expressed in extract.
Figure 1Major compounds found in essential oils and phenolic extracts obtained from E. globulus leaves.
Neuroprotective effects of EO, phenolic extracts, and the major constituents obtained from E. globulus leaves against various neurodegeneration model systems.
| Compound | Model | Dose and Duration | Effects | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EO | Cell free | IC50 = 0.1298 mg/mL | Inhibited AChE activity | [ |
| GT1-7 cells treated with H2O2 | 25 ppm, 24 h | Attenuated neuronal death | [ | |
| Wistar albino rats treated with ketamine | 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, p.o., 21 days | Facilitated GABA release, increased GSH levels, inhibited dopamine neurotransmission, decreased TNF-α levels, and diminished AChE activity | [ | |
| Computational | - | Candidate for NMDA antagonism | [ | |
| Cineol | Cell free | IC50 = 840 μM | Inhibited AChE activity | [ |
| Differentiated PC12 cells treated with Aβ25-35 | 2.5, 5 and 10 μM, 24 h | Restored cell viability | [ | |
| Primary rat cortical neurons/glial | 10 μM, 4 h | Increased SOD activity and reduced ROS production | [ | |
| α-pinene | Computational | - | Partially modulated GABAA-BZD receptors | [ |
| Brain slices | 10 µM | |||
| C57BL/6N mice treated with pentobarbital | 100 mg/kg, p.o. | |||
| C57BL/6 mice treated with scopolamine | 10 mg/kg, i.p. | Improved cognitive dysfunction | [ | |
| Phenolic extracts | SH-SY5Y cells treated with H2O2 | 5, 10, 25 and 50 µg/mL, 24 h | Increased cell viability, GSH levels, and antioxidant enzymes activity | [ |
| RAW264.7 cells treated with LPS and INF-γ | 51 and 83 µg/mL, 24 h | Inhibited NO and TNF-α production | [ | |
| Ellagic acid | Cell free | IC50 = 39 μM | Inhibited BACE-1 activity | [ |
| SH-SY5Y cells treated with Aβ1-42 | 5 and 10 μM, 48 h | Promoted oligomers loss | [ | |
| PC12 cells treated with Aβ25-35 | 0.5, 2.5, and 5 µM, 12 h | Attenuated Aβ-induced toxicity | ||
| PC12 cells treated with rotenone | 10 µM, 24 h | Attenuated cell death | [ | |
| Primary murine cortical microglia treated with Aβ1-42 | 10 µM, 24 h | Decreased TNF-α secretion | [ | |
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | 50 mg/kg/day, i.g., 60 days | Ameliorated learning and memory deficits | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with Aβ25-35 | 50 and 100 mg/kg/day, i.p., 7 days | Improved learning and memory deficits | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with STZ | 50 mg/kg/day, p.o., 30 days | Decreased brain Aβ levels | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with STZ | 35 mg/kg/day, p.o., 4 weeks | Reduced TBARS production and prevented the depletion of GSH and the inhibition of SOD and CAT activities | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with STZ | 17.5 and 35 mg/kg/day, p.o., 28 days | Reduced TBARS production and prevented the depletion of GSH | [ | |
| Diabetic rats treated with STZ | 50 mg/kg/day, p.o., 21 days | Decreased lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress index | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with scopolamine and diazepam | 30 and 100 mg/kg/day, i.p., 10 days | Prevented cognitive deficits | [ | |
| Quercetin | Computational | - | Candidate as AChE inhibitor | [ |
| Cell free | 50 µM | Inhibited and destabilized Aβ fibril formation | [ | |
| Cell free | 1 mg/mL (76.2% and 46.8% inhibition) | Inhibited AChE and BChE activities | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 181 µM and | Inhibited AChE and BChE activities | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 354 µM and | Inhibited AChE and BChE activities | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 19.8 µM | Inhibited AChE activity | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 3.6 µM | Inhibited AChE activity | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 14.4 µM | Inhibited AChE activity | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 51 µM | Inhibited AchE activity | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 124.6 μM | Decreased Aβ aggregation | [ | |
| Cell free | - | Inhibited Aβ fibril formation | [ | |
| HT22 cells treated with Aβ25-35 | - | Attenuated neuronal death | ||
| HT22 cells treated with OA | 5 and 10 µM, 12 h | Attenuated neuronal death | [ | |
| HT22 cells treated with OA | 5 and 10 µM, 12 h | Attenuated tau protein hyperphosphorylation | [ | |
| Differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated with OA | 100 nM, 6 h | Decreased tau phosphorylation levels | [ | |
| SH-SY5Y cells treated with OA | 10 µM, 6 h | Suppressed ER stress with decreased phosphorylation of IRE1α and PERK | [ | |
| C57BL/6J mice exposed to high-fat diets | 50 mg/kg/day, p.o., 10 weeks | Reduced IL-1β and IL-6 production | ||
| Cell free | 1, 5 and 10 µM | Inhibited the formation of Aβ fibrils and disaggregated Aβ fibrils | [ | |
| APPswe-transfected SH-SY5Y cells | 25, 50, and 100 nM, 24 h | Decreased ROS production and lipid peroxidation | ||
| Cell free | IC50 = 55 μM and IC50 = 19 µM | Inhibited AChE and BChE activities | [ | |
| SH-SY5Y cells treated with L-DOPA | 10, 50, 250, and 1000 µM, 24 h | Attenuated neuronal death | ||
| 7W CHO cells | 10, 25, and 50 µM, 24 h | Inhibited Aβ and sAPPβ production | [ | |
| SH-SY5Y cells treated with TNF-α | 20 µM, 30 min | |||
| SH-SY5Y, U373, and THP-1 cells treated with LPS and INF-γ or INF-γ | 33 µM, 8 h | Reduced oxidative/nitrative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins | [ | |
| PC12 cells treated with H2O2 | 10, 30, 60 and 100 µM, 2 h | Preserved cell viability | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 5.4 μM | Inhibited BACE activity | [ | |
| Primary rat E18 cortical neurons | 20 μM, 24 h | Decreased Aβ levels | ||
| Primary rat hippocampal neurons treated with Aβ1-42 | 5 and 10 μM, 24 h | Attenuated neuronal death, protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation, and apoptosis | [ | |
| Primary rat hippocampal neurons treated with Aβ1-42 and H2O2 | 10 μM, 24 h | Attenuated neuronal death, ROS accumulation, and depolarization of mitochondrial membrane | [ | |
| Primary mouse cortical neurons treated with | 30 μM, 24 and 48 h | Demonstrated free radical scavenging activity | [ | |
| Cell free | 250 µM | Inhibited Aβ fibrilization | [ | |
| 73 µM, ~12 days | Increased % of survival | |||
| 100 µM, 48 h | Increased proteasomal activity | [ | ||
| Zebrafish treated with scopolamine | 50 mg/kg/single dose, i.p. | Attenuated memory deficits | [ | |
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | 20 and 40 mg/kg/day, 16 weeks | Improved cognitive deficits | [ | |
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | 2 mg/g diet, 12 months | Increased Aβ clearance and reduced astrogliosis | [ | |
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | 1% in mouse chow, 10 months | Attenuated neuroinflammation by reducing IL-1β and MCP-1 levels | [ | |
| APP23 transgenic mice | 0.5% in mouse chow, 52 weeks | Reduced eIF2α phosphorylation and ATF4 expression through GADD34 induction | [ | |
| 3xTg-AD mice | 25 mg/kg/48 h, i.p., 3 months | Decreased extracellular β-amyloidosis, tauopathy, astrogliosis, and microgliosis | [ | |
| 3xTg-AD mice | 100 mg/kg/48 h, p.o., 12 months | [ | ||
| 3xTg-AD mice | 25 mg/kg/48 h, | Decreased reactive microglia and Aβ | [ | |
| 5xFAD mice | 500 mg/kg/day, oral gavage, 10 days | Increased brain ApoE and reduced Aβ levels | [ | |
| ICR mice injected with Aβ1-42 | 50 and 100 mg/kg/day, p.o., 1 month | Improved learning and memory loss | [ | |
| ICR mice injected with Aβ25-35 | 50 mg/kg/day, p.o., 2 weeks | Decreased protein levels of APP, BACE, and p-tau | [ | |
| Mice injected with Aβ25-35 | 30 mg/kg/day, p.o., 14 days | Decreased NO formation and lipid peroxidation | [ | |
| Kunming mice injected with Aβ25-35 | 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/day, oral gavage, 8 days | Regulated ERK/CREB/BDNF pathway | [ | |
| ICR mice treated with trimethyltin | 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg/day, 3 weeks | Decreased MDA generation and showed antioxidant capacity | [ | |
| C57BL/6N mice treated with LPS | 30 mg/kg/day, i.p., 2 weeks | Prevented the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and neuronal degeneration by regulating Bax/Bcl2, decreasing activated cytochrome c and caspase-3 activity, and cleaving PARP-1 | [ | |
| Swiss mice treated with LPS | 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/day, i.p., 7 days | Reversed memory deficits | [ | |
| Sprague–Dawley rats injected with Aβ1-42 | 100 mg/kg/day, p.o., 19 days | Reduced Aβ levels | [ | |
| Wistar rats injected with Aβ1-42 | 40 mg/kg/day, p.o., 1 month | Alleviated learning and memory deficits | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with STZ | 5, 25, and 50 mg/kg/day, oral gavage, 40 days | Reduced MDA levels | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with STZ | 40 and 80 mg/kg/day, i.p., 12 days | Enhanced spatial memory | [ | |
| Human early-stage | 80 mg/patient/day, p.o., 4 weeks | Enhanced memory recall | [ | |
| Rutin | Computational | - | Candidate as AChE inhibitor | [ |
| Cell free | 10 µM | Inhibited BACE activity | [ | |
| Cell free | IC50 = 0.219 mM and IC50 = 0.288 mM | Inhibited AChE and BChE activities | [ | |
| Cell free | 1, 5, and 10 µM | Inhibited the formation of Aβ fibrils and disaggregated Aβ fibrils | [ | |
| Cell free | 50 and 200 µM | Inhibited Aβ fibrillization and attenuated Aβ-induced cytotoxicity | [ | |
| SH-SY5Y and BV-2 cells treated with Aβ1-42 | 0.8 and 8 µM, 24 h | Decreased ROS, NO, GSSG, and MDA formation | ||
| Cell free | IC50 = 3.8 nM | Inhibited BACE activity | [ | |
| SH-SY5Y cells treated with amylin | 0.8, 4, and 8 µM, 24 and 48 h | Attenuated neuronal death | [ | |
| Primary mouse cortical neurons treated with | 30 μM, 24 and 48 h | Demonstrated free radical scavenging activity | [ | |
| Primary rat microglia treated with LPS | 50 mM, 24 h | Decreased expression levels of TNF- α, IL-1β, IL-6, and iNOS | [ | |
| Zebrafish treated with scopolamine | 50 mg/kg/single dose, i.p. | Attenuated memory deficits | [ | |
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | 100 mg/kg/day, p.o., 6 weeks | Decreased oligomeric Aβ level | [ | |
| ICR mice injected with Aβ25-35 | 100 mg/kg/day, p.o., 14 days | Decreased NO formation and lipid peroxidation | [ | |
| Swiss albino mice treated with STZ | 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day, p.o., 21 days | Restored cerebral blood flow and ATP content | [ | |
| Wistar rats injected with Aβ1-42 | 100 mg/kg/day, i.p., 3 weeks | Increased ERK, CREB, and BDNF expression and decreased MDA level | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with STZ | 25 mg/kg/day, p.o., 3 weeks | Decreased TBARS, PARP activity, and NO level | [ | |
| Sprague–Dawley rats with chronic | 50 mg/kg/day, i.p., 12 weeks | Attenuated oxidative damage, namely increased GPx activity and decreased MDA levels and protein carbonyls | [ | |
| Wistar rats injected with doxorubicin | 50 mg/kg/day, p.o., 50 days | Reduced CAT, GSH, SOD, and TNF-α levels | [ | |
| Wistar rats treated with scopolamine | 50 and 100 mg/kg/day, p.o., 15 days | Improved short- and long-term episodic memory deficits | [ |
Figure 2Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves in the amyloidogenic pathway and in the formation of amyloid-β (Aβ) in AD. The amyloidogenic pathway is initiated with the enzymatic breakdown of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase enzyme followed by catalytic cleavage of APP by γ-secretase to originate non-soluble protein or Aβ. Aβ oligomerization and accumulation leads to synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration.
Figure 3Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves on tau aggregation and formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in AD. Irregular phosphorylation of tau proteins destabilizes microtubules, leading to the formation of insoluble tau oligomers, which then accumulate to generate protomers. Then, two twisted protomers originate paired helical filaments, which after aggregation lead to the formation of NFTs. These intracellular structures are involved in synaptic and neuronal dysfunction, thus contributing to cognitive decline in AD.
Figure 4Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves in oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in AD. Aβ oligomers can insert the plasma membrane originating pores by which Ca2+ pass into the cytoplasm. Aβ can also interact with metal ions (Fe2+ and Cu+) to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which cause membrane lipid peroxidation. As consequence, the membrane turns depolarized, and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCC) and glutamate receptor-associated channels (in particular NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor) open increasing cytoplasmic Ca2+ content. Additionally, Aβ overproduction can cause mitochondrial damage, which culminates in ROS accumulation and ATP depletion that can impair axonal transport consequently originating abnormal mitochondrial dynamics and promoting neurotransmission deficits. ATP depletion can also lead to ionic alterations in the cytosol due to dysfunction of ATP-dependent ion channels. Moreover, ROS accumulation affects the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP), which further potentiates mitochondrial damage due to Ca2+ overload and inhibition of the electron transport chain. ROS increase also promotes damage to proteins, namely DNA and RNA.
Figure 5Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves on neuroinflammation in AD. A vicious circle between Aβ and tau accumulation in the brain, microglia activation, and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines culminates in neuronal death in AD.
Figure 6Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves on cholinesterase activity in AD. Synthesis of acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmitter from acetyl coenzyme A (Acetyl CoA) and choline (Ch) occurs by the action of the enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the presynaptic terminal. Acetylcholine is released in the synaptic cleft, where it can activate both muscarinic (mAChR) and nicotinic (nAChR) receptors. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) or butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) break acetylcholine into choline and acetate. ACh levels are low in AD brains and cholinergic neurotransmission in impaired. AChE and BChE inhibitors correct these deficits increasing the amount of ACh that remains in the synaptic cleft and interacts with postsynaptic receptors.
Figure 7Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves on inhibitory (A) and excitatory (B) synapses in AD. (A) The inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synapse. GABA is synthesized from glutamate by the glutamic acid decarboxylase enzymes in the presynaptic terminal of GABAergic neuron. The vesicular GABA transporter packs GABA into vesicles, which, after release in the synaptic cleft, binds GABAA receptors localized on the postsynaptic neuron. The reuptake of GABA into the presynaptic axon stops the GABA action in the synapse. GABA levels are significantly reduced in AD patients as well as the GABAA receptor density. (B) The excitatory glutamate synapse. Glutamine is converted to glutamate via glutaminase in the presynaptic terminal of glutamatergic neuron, and the vesicular glutamate transporter packs glutamate into vesicles. After glutamate release in the synaptic cleft, it acts on glutamate receptors localized on the postsynaptic neuron. The excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) present in nearby astrocytes clear the glutamate from the synaptic cleft. Glutamate is converted to glutamine via glutamine synthetase in astrocytes before being transported to presynaptic neurons. In AD, Aβ oligomers affect extrasynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors enriched in NR2B subunits, leading to an excessive activation and consequently to an excess of Ca2+ accumulation in the post-synaptic cell.
Figure 8Effect of compounds obtained from E. globulus leaves in the AD-associated memory and learning impairment.