| Literature DB >> 35335937 |
Patrícia Moreira1,2, Fábio Jesus Sousa1, Patrícia Matos2,3,4, Gonçalo Sousa Brites1,2,5, Maria José Gonçalves2,4, Carlos Cavaleiro2,4, Artur Figueirinha2,3,4, Lígia Salgueiro2,4, Maria Teresa Batista4, Pedro Costa Branco6, Maria Teresa Cruz1,2, Cláudia Fragão Pereira1,7.
Abstract
Eucalyptus globulus is planted extensively for pulp, paper and wood production. Although bioactive compounds obtained from its biomass are used as cosmetics ingredients, the skin effects were not yet fully explored. In order to fill this gap, this work aimed to study the protective effect against skin damage provided by the essential oil (EO) obtained from the hydrodistillation of Eucalyptus globulus leaves, and by an extract obtained from the hydrodistillation residual water (HRW). The major compound identified in the EO was 1,8-Cineole, and the phenolic acids in the HRW included gallic acid as the main phenolic constituent. Moreover, non-toxic EO and HRW concentrations were shown to have anti-aging skin effects in vitro, decreasing age-related senescence markers, namely β-galactosidase and matrix metalloproteinases activation, as well as collagen type 1 upregulation. In addition, EO and HRW were found to exhibit depigmenting effects by inhibiting tyrosinase and melanin production, along with potent anti-inflammatory properties. Furthermore, the absence of skin irritation and sensitization in cells exposed to EO and HRW revealed the safety of both extracts for topical use. Taken together, these results highlight the beneficial effects of extracts obtained from Eucalyptus globulus biomass for skin aesthetic and health purposes, which should be explored deeply for the prediction of future pharmaceutical and dermocosmetics industrial applications.Entities:
Keywords: Eucalyptus globulus; aging; allergy; aqueous phenolic extract; cytotoxicity; essential oil; hyperpigmentation; inflammation; skin health
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335937 PMCID: PMC8950756 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Chemical characterization of the essential oil (EO) from E. globulus leaves by gas chromatography (GC-FID) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
| RIa | RIb | Compound * | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 928 | 1025 | α-Pinene | 9.4 |
| 940 | 1077 | Camphene | 0.1 |
| 944 | 1131 | Verbenene | t |
| 967 | 1113 | β-Pinene | 0.2 |
| 978 | 1156 | Myrcene | 0.1 |
| 994 | 1167 | α-Phellandrene | t |
| 1010 | 1269 | 0.8 | |
| 1017 | 1201 | Limonene | 2.3 |
| 1017 | 1213 | 1,8-Cineole | 72.3 |
| 1044 | 1248 | γ-Terpinene | 0.2 |
| 1056 | 1438 | t | |
| 1066 | 1466 | t | |
| 1068 | 1439 | Cymenene | 0.1 |
| 1074 | 1291 | Terpinolene | 0.1 |
| 1096 | 1574 | Fenchyl alcohol | 0.2 |
| 1103 | 1489 | α-Campholenal | 0.2 |
| 1118 | 1645 | 3.6 | |
| 1133 | 1563 | Pinocarvone | 1.4 |
| 1143 | 1720 | Mentha-1,5-dien-8-ol | 0.3 |
| 1143 | 1698 | Borneol | 0.3 |
| 1156 | 1594 | Terpinene-4-ol | 0.3 |
| 1156 | 1842 | 0.1 | |
| 1163 | 1879 | 0.6 | |
| 1167 | 1690 | α-Terpineol | 0.9 |
| 1177 | 1788 | Myrtenol | 0.1 |
| 1193 | 1828 | 0.2 | |
| 1199 | 1879 | 0.6 | |
| 1212 | 1731 | Carvone | 0.1 |
| 1264 | 1574 | Bornyl acetate | t |
| 1326 | 1690 | α-Terpinyl acetate | 1.2 |
| 1403 | 1591 | 0.1 | |
| 1424 | 1602 | Aromadendrene | 0.2 |
| 1443 | 1663 | α-Humulene | 0.1 |
| 1447 | 1636 | Alloaromadendrene | t |
| 1478 | 1720 | δ- Selinene | t |
| 1548 | 1916 | Palustrol | t |
| 1554 | 2110 | Spathulenol | t |
| 1557 | 1971 | Caryophyllene oxide | t |
| 1558 | 2062 | Globulol | 1.6 |
| 1568 | 2064 | Viridiflorol | 0.1 |
| 1594 | 2093 | 10- | 0.2 |
| 1617 | 2188 | α-Muurolol | 0.1 |
| 1623 | 2215 | β-Eudesmol | 0.1 |
| 1629 | 2218 | α-Cadinol | t |
|
|
|
* Compounds listed in order of their elution on the SPB-1 column. t: traces (≤ 0.05%); RIa: retention indices on the SPB-1 column relative to C8 to C23 n-alkanes; RIb: retention indices on the SupelcoWax-10 column relative to C8 to C23 n-alkanes.
Figure 1High-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector (HPLC-PDA) profile of the hydrodistillation residual water extract (HRW) from E. globulus leaves, recorded at 280 and 320 nm. AU, arbitrary units.
Chemical characterization of the hydrodistillation residual water extract (HRW) from E. globulus leaves by high-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector coupled to mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization (HPLC-PDA-ESI/MSn).
| Peak * | Rt (min) | λmax | HPLC-ESI-MSn | Attempt to Identify | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precursor Ion | MS2 | MS3 | ||||
| 1 | 3.24 | 234sh, 238, 246, 257 | 633(100) | 301(100), 275 (16), 249 (15) | 284 (34), 257 (80), 229 (100), 201 (15), 185 (55), 173 (13) | HHDP galloyllglucose |
| 2 | 4.38 | 234sh, 238, 246, 270 | 169(100) | 125(100) | 125 (46), 107 (13), 97(100), 81 (96), 79 (28), 69 (12) | Gallic acid |
| 3 | 5.63 | 231sh, 234sh, 238, 246, 277 | 633(100) | 301(100) | 284 (61), 257(100), 229 (63), 213 (11), 201 (31), 185 (70) | HHDP galloyllglucose |
| 4 | 12.39 | 231sh, 238, 246, 265 | 783(100) | 935 (24), 765(100), 613 (12) | 721 (12), 613 (90), 597(100), 533 (13), 443 (11), 427 (29), 401 (20), 399 (17), 325 (19), 301 (58), 275 (63), 273(15), 231 (15), 229 (12) | bis-HHDP-glucose |
| 5 | 17.14 | 231sh, 238, 246sh, 256, 289sh | 353(100) | 233(100) | 205(100) | 3-Caffeoyl-quinic acid |
| 6 | 18.36 | 229sh, 238, 246sh, 252, 288sh, 299, 325 | 431(100) | 385(100), 223 (16) | 295 (11), 223(100), 205 (57), 161 (48), 153 (57), 151 (12) | Sinapoyl-hexoside |
| 7 | 18.93 | - | 191(100) | 173 (90), 127(100), 85(65) | 109(100), 85 (55) | Quinic acid |
| 8 | 18.93 | 231sh, 238, 246sh, 252, 292sh, 299sh, 325 | 353(100) | 191(100) | 127(100), 172 (60), 85(55) | 5-Caffeoyl-quinic acid |
| 9 | 20.03 | 232sh, 238, 246, 259, 330sh | 461(100) | 415(100) | 269(100), 247 (14), 161 (33) | Not identified |
| 10 | 21.13 | 234sh, 238, 246, 259, 368sh | 1085(100) | 783 (12), 765(100) | 613 (58), 597 (61), 595 (14), 427 (21), 399 (27), 383 (19), 301(100), 275 (51), 273 (14), 259 (10), 231 (14), 229 (21) | Cornusiin B or eucalbanin A |
| 11 | 21.52 | 232sh, 238, 246, 259, 371sh | 1085(100) | 1069 (25), 765(100), 755 (30), 451 (12) | - | Cornusiin B or eucalbanin A |
| 12 | 22.10 | 226sh, 234sh, 238, 246, 258sh, 265, 366sh | 451(100) | 313 (40), 271 (84), 211(100), 169 (92), 151 (13) | 168(100), 124 (12) | Galloyl-glucose ester |
| 13 | 22.68 | 233sh, 238, 246, 261, 299sh, 358sh | 1253(100) | 1074 (47), 971(100), 781 (39), 640 (79) | - | Punicalin derivative |
| 14 | 25.25 | 233sh, 238, 246, 257, 269sh, 309sh, 353sh, 362, 367sh | 565(100) | 550 (78), 549 (12), 519 (17), 419(100), 405 (60). 401 (44), 386 (28), 373 (21), 355 (11), 233 (18), 202 (21), 187 (19) | 404(100), 373 (25) | Not identified |
| 15 | 26.52 | 231sh, 234sh, 238, 246, 262, 292sh, 352sh | 275(100) | 257(100), 247 (13), 231 (14), 229 (31), 203 (21) | - | Not identified |
| 16 | 34.34 | 226sh, 234sh, 238, 243sh, 246sh, 258sh, 268, 356sh | 497(100) | 331(100), 169 (79) | 169(100), 125 (22) | Eucaglobulin |
| 17 | 35.48 | 231sh, 234sh, 238, 246sh, 255, 265sh, 346sh, 364, 380sh | 477(100) | 315(100), 300 (20) | 300(100) | Methylellagic acid hexose |
| 18 | 38.16 | 232sh, 234sh, 238, 246, 258, 265sh, 354, 381sh | 477(100) | 301(100) | 273 (15), 257 (12), 179(100), 151 (85) | Quercetin- |
| 19 | 39.20 | 227sh, 238, 239sh, 242sh, 244sh, 246sh, 260, 266sh, 295sh, 354, 381sh | 609(100) | 301(100), 271 (35), 255 (12) | 273 (12), 239 (13), 179(100), 151 (79) | Quercetin 3- |
| 20 | 43.08 | 234sh, 238, 246sh, 255, 267sh, 306sh, 351sh, 367, 382sh | 301(100) | 284 (55), 257 (84), 245 (13), 229(100), 201 (22), 185 (78) | 212 (13), 201 (69), 185(100), 173 (34), 157 (34), 145 (34) | Ellagic acid |
| 21 | 45.25 | 229sh, 232sh, 238, 241sh, 246sh, 257, 267sh, 301sh, 351, 381sh | 447(100) | 301(100) | 273 (19), 179(100), 151 (81) | Quercetin3- |
| 22 | 46.94 | 231sh, 234sh, 238, 242sh, 246sh, 257sh, 261, 346 267sh, 293sh, 357sh, 380sh, 412sh, 420sh, 446sh, 466sh, 486 | 461(100) | 285(100), 173 (14) | - | Luteolin 7- |
* The number of the peaks in this table corresponds to the peaks indicated in Figure 1. MS2 = 1st generation product ion spectra; MS3 = 2nd generation product ion spectra.
Figure 2Effect of HRW and essential oil (EO) extracts from E. globulus leaves on the cell viability of RAW 264.7 macrophages (A), B-16V melanocytes (B), HaCaT keratinocytes (C), and NIH/3T3 fibroblasts (D). The cells were treated for 24 h with 0–1.25 mg/mL EO or 0–100 µg/mL HRW, and then their viability was evaluated using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as a control (CTRL), and cells treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) were used as the solvent control. The results were expressed as the percentage (%) of cell viability relative to the CTRL, and represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The statistical analysis was carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL.
Figure 3Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on nitric oxide (NO) production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. The cells were treated with 0.32 mg/mL EO or 12.5 μg/mL HRW in the presence or absence of 1 μg/mL LPS, for 24 h. The cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The NO production was determined in the cell culture supernatants using the Griess reagent. The results were expressed as the percentage (%) of nitrite production relative to the LPS; they represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s and Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL. # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01: significantly different compared to the LPS.
Figure 4Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on the expression of pro-inflammatory genes in RAW 264.7 macrophages. The cells were pre-incubated for 18 h with 0.32 mg/mL EO or 12.5 μg/mL HRW, before incubation with or without 1 μg/mL LPS for an additional 6-h period. The cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. Il-1β, Il-6, Nos2, Tnf-α and Cox-2 gene expression was evaluated by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR). The results, expressed as relative fold changes compared to the LPS, represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s and Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, and #### p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the LPS.
Figure 5Wound healing effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on NIH/3T3 fibroblasts. A mechanical injury was performed in cells incubated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO or 0.8 μg/mL HRW for 24 h. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The closure of the wound area was determined by the analysis of the images with Fiji Is Just ImageJ software. The results—expressed as a percentage (%) of the closed wound area—represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments performed in duplicate. The statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 6Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on the senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity in etoposide (Eto)-stimulated HaCaT keratinocytes (A) and NIH/3T3 fibroblasts (B). Cellular senescence was induced using 100 µM Eto for 72 h for HaCaT and 12.5 µM Eto for 24 h for NIH/3T3. After the incubation period, the senescent cells were treated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO or 0.8 μg/mL HRW for 24 h. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The senescent cells were quantified using a Senescence β-Galactosidase staining kit. The results—expressed as the percentage (%) of the senescent cells—represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments performed in duplicate. The statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s and Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL. # p < 0.05, and ## p < 0.01: significantly different compared to the Eto.
Figure 7Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on levels of the p53 senescence marker in Eto-stimulated HaCaT keratinocytes (A) and NIH/3T3 fibroblasts (B). Cellular senescence was induced with 100 µM Eto during 72 h for HaCaT and 12.5 µM Eto during 24 h for NIH/3T3. After the incubation period, the senescent cells were treated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO or 0.8 μg/mL HRW for 24 h. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The p53 levels were evaluated by Western Blot. The results normalized to β-actin and expressed as the relative amount compared to the CTRL, represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was made by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s and Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001: significantly different compared to the CTRL. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01: significantly different compared to Eto.
Figure 8Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on MMP-1, MMP-9 and MPP-13 activity. In a cell-free system, MMP-1, MMP-9 or MMP-13 enzymes were pre-incubated with EO (0.16 mg/mL), HRW (0.8 μg/mL) or ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (0.14 mM) for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by the addition of MMP fluorogenic substrate. The enzymatic activity results were expressed as the percentage (%) of enzyme inhibition relative to the activity determined in the CTRL; the results represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL.
Figure 9Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on the collagen I expression levels in HaCaT keratinocytes. The cells were treated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO or 0.8 μg/mL HRW for 24 h. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The Collagen I gene expression was evaluated by RT-PCR. The results—expressed as relative fold changes compared to the CTRL—represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05: significantly different compared to the CTRL.
Figure 10Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on the melanin production (A) and tyrosinase activity (B) in 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX)-stimulated B-16V melanocytes. The cells were treated, in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO, 0.8 μg/mL HRW or 40 µM kojic acid (KA) (positive control) for 72 h, with 200 µM IBMX, a melanogenesis inducer. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The tyrosinase activity and melanin content were determined by a spectrophotometric method. The results were expressed as a percentage (%) of the CTRL, and represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s and Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001: significantly different compared to the IBMX.
Figure 11Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on the Hmox-1 and Nqo1 expression levels in HaCaT keratinocytes. The cells were treated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO or 0.8 μg/mL HRW for 24 h, and then the Hmox-1 and Nqo1 gene expression was evaluated by RT-PCR. The cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The results—expressed as relative fold changes compared to the CTRL—represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. ** p < 0.01: significantly different compared to the CTRL.
Figure 12Phenotypic characterization (A) and effect on the levels of the co-stimulatory proteins CD54 and CD86 (B) of HRW and EO from E. globulus leaves in THP-1 monocytes. The cells were treated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO or 0.8 μg/mL HRW for 24 h. In addition, skin sensitization was induced with 8 µM 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB) for 24 h. The cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The blue line represents unstained cells, and the red line represents the specific levels of the tested cells. The levels of CD54 and CD86 were measured by flow cytometry. The results—expressed as a percentage (%) of the fluorescence intensity (RFI) relative to the CTRL—represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s and Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. * p < 0.05: significantly different compared to the CTRL.
Figure 13Effect of HRW and EO extracts from E. globulus leaves on tissue viability in Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE). The inserts were treated in the absence or presence of 0.16 mg/mL EO, 0.8 μg/mL HRW, or 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (positive control) for 42 min. Cells treated with the medium alone were used as the CTRL. The tissue viability was assessed by the MTT assay. The results were expressed as a percentage (%) of the tissue viability relative to the CTRL, and represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. **** p < 0.0001: significantly different compared to the CTRL.
Antifungal effect of E. globulus leaf EO and HRW extracts for Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans and dermatophytes.
| Strains | EO | HRW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC a | MLC a | MIC b | MLC b | |
|
| 5 | 5 | >800 | >800 |
|
| 5 | 5 | >800 | >800 |
|
| 2.5 | 5 | >800 | >800 |
|
| 5 | 5 | >800 | >800 |
|
| 2.5 | 5 | 400 | >800 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 400 | 800 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 400 | 400 |
|
| 5 | 5 | 400 | 800 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | >800 | >800 |
|
| 5 | 5 | 800 | >800 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 200 | 200 |
|
| 1.25 | 2.5 | 200 | 200 |
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal lethal concentration (MLC) were determined by a macrodilution method, and are expressed in a mg/mL and in b µg/mL.