| Literature DB >> 35955727 |
Milena Matuszczak1, Adam Kiljańczyk1, Maciej Salagierski1.
Abstract
The non-muscle invasive bladder cancer tends to recur and progress. Therefore, it requires frequent follow-ups, generating costs and making it one of the most expensive neoplasms. Considering the expensive and invasive character of the current gold-standard diagnostic procedure, white-light cystoscopy, efforts to find an alternative method are ongoing. Although the last decade has seen significant advancements in urinary biomarker tests (UBTs) for bladder cancer, international guidelines have not recommended them. Currently, the paramount urgency is to find and validate the test with the best specificity and sensitivity, which would allow for the optimizing of diagnosis, prognosis, and a treatment plan. This review aims to summarise the up-to-date state of knowledge relating to UBTs and new developments in the detection, prognosis, and surveillance of bladder cancer and their potential applications in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: biological fluids; bladder cancer; cancer biomarkers; cell-free DNA; cfDNA; diagnosis; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; liquid biopsy; personalized therapy; precision oncology; prognosis; tumour markers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955727 PMCID: PMC9369188 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Bladder cancer staging. When the tumour invades the detrusor muscle or beyond (T2-T4 stage), then it is called the muscle-invasive type (MIBC) [4].
Table presenting data for methylation biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive Capacity | Type of Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIM, OSTM1, SLC4A10, AC092805.1, ONECUT2 | Prognostic | Cohort 1 = 192 (116 BCa, MIBC = 47, NMIBC = 68; 76 non-BCa) | Urine samples collected from 464 patients before cystoscopy or surgery. Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany, Catalog No. 51106) and quantified by the Qubit Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA, Catalog No. Q32851). Bisulfite treatment was performed on genomic DNA with the EZ-96-DNA Methylation-Direct MagPrep Kit (Zymo Research, USA, Catalog No. D5044). The methylation of bisulfite-treated DNA was analyzed by a 22-marker BCA DNA (AnchorDX, China, Catalog No. UME043) on the QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Ma, USA). EpiTect PCR Control DNA Set (Qiagen, Germany, Catalog No. 59695) was used as positive and negative controls. DNA quantified by the Meth-Quant Master Mix (AnchorDx, China, Catalog No. UME043-01 ) and the 22-marker BCA Detect Panel (AnchorDx, China, Catalog No. UME043-02). | Preoperative risk stratification of BCa | Retrospective | [ | ||
| Cohort 2 = 98 (59 BCa, MIBC = 22, NMIBC = 35; 39 non-BCa) | ||||||||
| ONECUT2, VIM | Diagnostic and prognostic | Cohort 1 = 192 (116 BCa, MIBC = 47, NMIBC = 68; 76 non-BCa) | BCa detection | AUC = 0.898, PPV = 88.6%, NPV = 80.8%, Se. = 87.1%, Sp. = 82.9% | Retrospective | |||
| Cohort 2 = 98 (59 BCA, MIBC = 22, NMIBC = 35; 39 non-BCa) | AUC = 0.921, PPV = 92.9%, NPV = 83.3%, Se. = 88.1%, Sp. = 89.7% | |||||||
| Cohort 3 = 174 (35 BCa, MIBC = 5, NMIBC = 29; 147 non-BCa) | AUC = 0.935, PPV = 60.8%, NPV = 97.6%, Se. = 91.2%, Sp. = 85.7% | Prospective | ||||||
| FAM19A4 | diagnostic | Urine samples of 208 patients were collected before cystoscopy or TURBT. DNA was isolated from urine using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentrations were measured with NanoDrop 1000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). EZ DNA Methylation™ Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA) was used for bisulphite conversion. qMSP was performed to identify methylation values of targeted biomarkers. Data analysis were performed with R Statistical Software (v.3.6.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.72 | Retrospective | [ | ||
| GHSR | GHSR AUC = 0.89, | |||||||
| MAL | ||||||||
| miR-129 | AUC = 0.83 | |||||||
| miR-935 | AUC = 0.79 | |||||||
| PHACTR3 | AUC = 0.69 | |||||||
| PRDM14 | AUC = 0.88 | |||||||
| SST | AUC = 0.84 | |||||||
| ZIC1 | AUC = 0.88 | |||||||
| Altogether | Se. = 81%, | |||||||
| Bladder epicheck | diagnostic | Urine samples collected from 205 patients were centrifuged twice. DNA was extracted using Bladder EpiCheck DNA extraction kit and prepared for the PCR assay using the Bladder EpiCheck test kit. Data analysis performed with GraphPad-Prism 5 software (Graphpad Software-Prism 5 software, San Diego, CA, USA) and MedCalc version 10.2.0.0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.94, PPV = 60%, NPV = 97.7%, Se. = 94.3%, Sp. = 79.6% | Prospective | [ | ||
| DNA hypermethylation (RASSF1, RARB, DAPK, TERT, APC) | diagnostic | Urine samples were collected form 85 patients before cystoscopy. DNA was extracted from urine using the Cells and Tissue DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Thorold, Canada). Sodium bisulfite modification of DNA was performed with the EZ DNA Methylation-GoldKit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA). Quantification of the percentage of methylation of DNA was performed with Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and on Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.76, PPV = 90%, NPV = 53%, Se. = 61.4%, Sp. = 86.4% | Prospective | [ | ||
| PCDH17, POU4F2, PENK | diagnostic | DNA from the urinary cell pellets was extracted using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). DNA quality and quantity were assessed using a NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Bisulfite conversion was performed with a ZYMO EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (ZYMO, Irvine, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina Hiseq platform. The bisulfite modification reaction was executed by 96-Well GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). DNA amplification was performed on 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.96, Se. = 87%, Sp. = 97% | Retrospective | [ |
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PCR—polymerase chain reaction, PPV—positive predictive value, qPCR—quantitative polymerase chain reaction, NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, VIM—Vimentin, OSTM1—Osteoclastogenesis Associated Transmembrane Protein 1, SLC4A10—Solute Carrier Family 4 Member 10, AC092805.1—, ONECUT2—One Cut Homeobox 2, FAM19A4—TAFA chemokine like family member 4, PHACTR3—Phosphatase And Actin Regulator 3, PRDM14—PR/SET Domain 14, SST—Somatostatin, ZIC1—Zic Family Member 1, RARB—Retinoic Acid Receptor Beta, DAPK—Death Associated Protein Kinase 1, TERT—Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase, APC—Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, miR—microRNA.
Table presenting data for exosomes.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive Capacity | Type of Study | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Diagnostic | Urine samples were collected from 116 patients and then expression of genes and functionality of exosomal RNAs were investigates by using single-cell mapper (scMappR). Data analysis performed with R package (version 3.0.2, R-project). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.898 | Retrospective | [ | |||
| KLHDC7B | Diagnostic and prognostic | Urine samples collected from 90 patients. Extraction of exosomes was conducted using a commercial kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Thorold, Canada). Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) was used to examine the size distribution and concentration of exosomes (ZetaView particle tracker, ZetaVIEW S/N 17-310, Particle Metrix, Germany). Extracted exosomes were imaged using a JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Inc., Peabody, MA, USA). Western Blot was performed using Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (WBKLS0100). Urine Exosome RNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp, Product No. 47200, Thorold, Canada) was used to extract total exosome RNA, and then evaluated by a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex-Taq II (RR820A, Takara, Dalian, China). Data analysis performed using SPSS 24.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). | BCa detection | BCa progression | AUC = 0.842, PPV = 68.5%, NPV = 86.7%, Se. = 68.5%, Sp. = 88.3% | Retrospective | [ | ||
| CASP14 | AUC = 0.765, PPV = 80.3%, NPV = 64.7%, Se. = 77.5%, Sp. = 70.6% | ||||||||
| PRSS1 | AUC = 0.823, PPV = 60.3%, NPV = 87.5%, Se. = 78.1%, Sp. = 75.0% | ||||||||
| MIR205HG | AUC = 0.843, PPV = 56%, NPV = 88.7%, Se. = 77.3%, Sp. = 83.1% | ||||||||
| GAS5 | AUC = 0.729, PPV = 74.7%, NPV = 64.1%, Se. = 78.7%, Sp. = 60.3% | ||||||||
| A2M | Diagnostic and surveillance | Urine protein and exosome was extracted from 156 participants urine. Prepared urinary peptides were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry LC-MS/MS. MS raw files were processed in MaxQuant (v.1.5.3.1). Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) methods were conducted with an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). | BCa detection | n/a | A2M | Model 2 (All biomarkers) | Retrospective | [ | |
| CFL1 | |||||||||
| ITIH2 | |||||||||
| APOA1 | AUC = 0.702 | ||||||||
| AFM | AUC = 0.687 | ||||||||
| FGA | AUC = 0.612 | ||||||||
| CDC5L | AUC = 0.659 | ||||||||
| CD5L | AUC = 0.658 | ||||||||
| miRNA-96 | Diagnostic | Exosomes were isolated from urine of 100 patients before treatment using miRCURY Exosome Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Extraction of total miRNA was performed with miRcute miRNA isolation kits (Tiangen biotech, Beijing, China). miScript Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used for reverse transcription and polyadenylation of the miRNA to complementary DNA (cDNA). Quantification of exosomal miRNA was performed with a Stratagene Mx3005P. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.85, PPV = 91.1%, NPV = 81.8%, Se. = 80.4%, Sp. = 91.8% | Prospective | [ | |||
| miRNA-183 | AUC = 0.83, PPV = 81.6%, NPV = 78.4%, Se. = 78.4%, Sp. = 81.6% | ||||||||
| miR-93-5p | Diagnostic | Exosomes were isolated from urine collected from 120 patients before treatment in an ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.838, Se. = 74.1%, Sp. = 90.2% | retrospective | [ | |||
| miR-516a-5p | AUC = 0.790, Se. = 72.9%, Sp. = 89.9% | ||||||||
| HSP90 | diagnostic | Urine samples were collected from 77 and BCa tissue samples from 47 patients. Proteis concentration of Te-EVs was measured using a Micro BCa protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Proteins in urinary and tissue samples were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred on to a polyvinylidene difluoride (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The size and concentration of EVs were analyzed using NTA system (NanoSight). TEM was used to inspect the samples with JEM-1400Plus transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). EVs were lysed using a MPEX PTS reagent kit (GL Science). TMT 10-plex system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for TMT-labeling. TMT-labeled peptides were alanyzed using a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with an UltiMate 3000 Nano-flow high-performance LC system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and an HTC-PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). Data analysis was performed using JMP Pro software (v.14.0.0, SAS Institute, CARY, N.C, USA), and visualization quantification was performed using GraphPad Prism software (v.7.05; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.813, Se. = 82.5%, Sp. = 70.0% | retrospective | [ | |||
| SDC1 | AUC = 0.785, Se. = 82.5%, Sp. = 63.3% | ||||||||
| MARCKS | AUC = 0.772, Se. = 65%, Sp. = 80% | ||||||||
| MARCKSL | AUC = 0.757, | ||||||||
| TJP2 | AUC = 0.748 | ||||||||
| CD55 | AUC = 0.706 | ||||||||
| TERC | Diagnostic and prognostic | Exosomes used for sequencing were isolated from urine using differential centrifugation. | BCa detection | AUC = 0.836, Se. = 78.65%, Sp. = 77.78% | retrospective | [ | |||
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PCR—polymerase chain reaction, PPV—positive predictive value, qPCR—quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RT-qPCR—Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, CD248—Tumour Endothelial Marker 1, MT-ATP—Mitochondrially Encoded ATP Synthase Membrane Subunit 6, KLHDC7B—Kelch Domain-Containing Protein 7B, CASP14—Caspase 14, PRSS1—Serine Protease 1, MIR205HG—MIR205 Host Gene, GAS5—Growth Arrest Specific 5, A2M—Alpha-2-Macroglobulin, CFL1—Cofilin 1, APOA1—Apolipoprotein A1, ITIH2—Inter-Alpha-Trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain 2, AFM—Afamin, FGA—Fibrinogen Alpha Chain, CDC5L—Cell Division Cycle 5 Like, CD5L—CD5 Molecule Like, miR—microRNA, HSP90—Heat Shock Protein 90, SDC1—Syndecan 1, MARCKS—Myristoylated Alanine Rich Protein Kinase C Substrate, MARCKSL—MARCKS-related Protein, TJP2—Tight Junction Protein 2, CD55—Complement Decay-accelerating Factor, TERC—Telomerase RNA Component.
Table presenting data for proteomics biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive Capacity | Type of Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APOA1 | prognostic | Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood and tumour tissues of all patients using the phenol chloroform method and DNA extraction kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA). PCR was conducted using DNTP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 mMdTTP primers (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Taq DNA polymerase (Biotools, Madrid, Spain). PCR-RFLP was performed using a restriction endonuclease enzyme (New England Biolabs, NEB, England). APOA1 concentrations were measured using standard source ELISA kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). | n/a | BCa progression | AUC = 0.889 | retrospective | [ | |
| CDHR2 | Prognostic and surveillance | Urine samples of 40 patients obtained pre- and postoperatively. iTRAQ reagent kit (8plex, Applied Biosystems, Bedford, MA, USA) was used to quantify proteins in the urine. Q-Exactive mass spectrometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyse the samples which then were validated with western blot. | n/a | Postoperative non-recurrence probability | No data | retrospective | [ | |
| HSP27 | n/a | High expression is associated with BCa progression | No data | |||||
| HNRNPA2B1 | n/a | Postoperative non-recurrence probability | No data | |||||
| BTA | Diagnostic and prognostic | Cytology urine of 157 patients was performed and interpreted by pathologists. | BCa vs. UTUC differentiation | BCa survival | AUC = 0.84, PPV = 82%, NPV = 72%, Se. = 74%, Sp. = 81% | retrospective | [ | |
| BTA-stat | AUC = 0.67, PPV = 70%, NPV = 64%, Se. = 69%, Sp. = 63% | |||||||
| NMP22 | AUC = 0.69, PPV = 77%, NPV = 62%, Se. = 59%, Sp. = 79% | |||||||
| Survivin | AUC = 0.84, PPV = 84%, NPV = 75%, Se. = 74%, Sp. = 81% | |||||||
| PD-L1 | diagnostic | Quantikine ELISA for Human/Cynomolgus Monkey PD-L1/B7-H1 Immunoassay from R&D Systems (Catalog Number DB7H10) was used to inspect the urine samples of 122 patients. Data analysis was performed with SAS software v 9.4 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.74, PPV = 92%, NPV = 47%, Se. = 53%, Sp. = 90% | retrospective | [ | ||
| ADXBLADDER | prognostic | ADXBLADDER test was performed on urine samples of 629 patients. Data analysis was performed with Stata 12.1 (StataCorp,.College Station, TX, USA) | BCa recurrence prediction | AUC = 0.56, PPV = 17.5%, NPV = 99.15%, Se. = 66.7%, Sp. = 76.0% | prospective | [ | ||
| ANG | prognostic | Urine samples of 64 patients were tested with multiplex bead-based immunoassay (Oncuria™) from R&D Systems Inc (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Data analysis was performed with SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). | Treatment response, recurrence | AUC = 0.7444, PPV = 41.2%, NPV = 91.5%, Se. = 63.6%, Sp. = 81.1% | prospective | [ | ||
| CA9 | AUC = 0.6878, PPV = 30.4%, NPV = 90.2%, Se. = 63.8%, Sp. = 69.8% | |||||||
| MMP10 | AUC = 0.7238, PPV = 32%, NPV = 92.3%, Se. = 72.7%, Sp. = 67.9% |
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PCR—polymerase chain reaction, PCR-RFLP—Restriction fragment length polymorphism PCR, PPV—positive predictive value, NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, APOA1—Apolipoprotein A1, CDHR2—Cadherin Related Family Member 2, HSP27—heat shock protein beta-1, HNRNPA2B1—Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A2/B1, BTA—Bladder Tumour Antigen, NMP22—Nuclear Matrix Protein-22, PD-L1—Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1, ANG—Angiogenin, CA9—Carbonic Anhydrase 9, MMP10—Matrix Metallopeptidase 10.
Table presenting data for mRNA biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive capacity | Type of Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBO1, CRH, IGF2 | diagnostic | Urine collected from 177 patients and then evaluated d for ROBO1, WNT5A, | BCa screening and surveillance (detection) | Risk stratification | AUC = 0.923, PPV = 47.1%, NPV = 97.4%, Se. = 92.5%, Sp. = 73.5% | retrospective | [ | |
| S100A6, TRAM1 | diagnostic | RNeasy Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used to isolate RNA from urine samples of 113 patients which then were quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Measuring of concentration and integrity of pooled urinary RNA was done with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). cDNA synthesis was done with SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit—Pico Input Mammalian (TaKaRa Bio INC., Kusatsu, prefecture Shiga, Japan) and then purified with Agencourt AMPure XP PCR purification system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The double-stranded cDNA libraries were quantified with Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit and the Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA was sequenced by GATC Biotech AG (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany). qPCR was performed using SYBR green and TaqMan Systems. Data analysis was performed with SDS 2.1 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). | BCa detection | No data | retrospective | [ | ||
| Xpert BCa Monitor (ABL1, ANXA10, CRH, IGF2, UPK1B) | diagnostic | Cepheid GeneXpert Instrument System was used for sample processing, nucleic acid amplification, and detection of the target sequences. XLSTAT version 2020.2.2 (Addinsoft) was used for data analysis. | BCa recurrence detection | AUC = 0.73, PPV = 21.3%, NPV = 96.5%, Se. = 72.7%, Sp. = 73.7% | retrospective | [ | ||
| Xpert analysis | Diagnostic and prognostic | GeneXpert system (Cepheid, Synnyvale, CA, USA) was used to detect target mRNA sequences (ABL1, ANXA, UPK1B, CRH, IGF2) in urine samples of 254 patients using RT-PCR. Data analysis performed with IBM statistica software v.20. | BCa detection | PPV = 66.4%, NPV = 88.9%, Se. = 85.9%, Sp. = 72.3% | prospective | [ | ||
| CYR61 | Prognostic and diagnostic | Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissue using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA’s integrity was determined using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR PREMIX ex Taq (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and Mx3005p thermal cycler (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against CYR61 (ab80112; dilution 1:400, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used to stain CYR61. Urine samples of 303 patients were tested for CYR61 levels using commercial ELISA test (DY4055, R&D Systems, MN, USA). Data analysis performed with SPSS statistical package, v 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). | MIBC vs. NMIBC differentiation | BCa progression | AUC = 0.883, Se. = 72.7%, Sp. = 86.0% | retrospective | [ | |
| Xpert BCa monitor (ABL1, CRH, IGF2, UPK1B, ANXA10) | diagnostic | Urine samples collected from 139 patients were tested with the XBCM. Data analysis peformed with Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.79, PPV = 51%, NPV = 92%, Se. = 58%, Sp. = 89% | retrospective | [ | ||
| Diagnostic and surveillance | Urine samples of 139 patients were tested with Xpert BCa Monitor (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Data analysis performed with STATA® (IC 16.1; StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). | BCa detection | No data | prospective | [ | |||
| CxBladder (MDK, HOXA13, CDC2, IGFBP5, CXCR2) | diagnostic | Urine samples collected from 28 patients were sent for urine cytology and CxBladder test. Statistical analysis performed with Microsoft Excel. | BCa detection | PPV = 62%, NPV = 100%, Se. = 100%, Sp. = 75% | prospective | [ | ||
| diagnostic | Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used on urine of to measure the expression of 5 genotypic biomarkers (MDK, CDK1, IGFBP5, HOXA13, CXCR2). Data analysis was performed with R 3.5.1 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). | Stratification of patients at low and high probability of BCa | NPV = 99.4%, Se. = 92.4%, Sp. = 93.8% | prospective | [ |
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PCR—polymerase chain reaction, PPV—positive predictive value, qPCR—quantitative polymerase chain reaction, qRT-PCR—Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR, NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, ROBO1—Roundabout Guidance Receptor 1, CRH—Corticotropin Releasing Hormone, IGF2—Insulin Like Growth Factor 2, S100A6—S100 Calcium Binding Protein A6, TRAM1—Translocation Associated Membrane Protein 1, ABL1—ABL Proto-Oncogene 1, ANXA10—Annexin A10, CRH—Corticotropin Releasing Hormone, UPK1B—Uroplakin 1B, CYR61—Cysteine-rich Angiogenic Inducer 61, MDK—Midkine, HOXA13—Homeobox A13, CDC2—Cell Division Cycle 2 (Cyclin Dependent Kinase 1), IGFBP5—Insulin Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5, CXCR2—C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 2.
Table presenting data for mutations biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive Capacity | Type of Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIK3CA | diagnostic | Genomic DNA extracted from fresh frozen tumours and urine cell sediments of 70 patients using phenol/chloroform method. DNA was quantified with a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA amplification was performed on ProFlex PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed with BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Data analysis IBM SPSS software version 23. | BCa detection | Se. = 66.7%, Sp. = 100% | prospective | [ | ||
| AKT1 | Se. = 100%, Sp. = 100% | |||||||
| TERT | diagnostic | DNA was isolated from urine samples of 60 patients using QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The reference plasmids were created using pUC19 vector (cloning sites KpnI and HindIII). Forward primer and reverse primer were provided by Evrogen RU, AO. DNA isolated from liver cancer cells (originating from the HepG2 cell line; cat no. 85011430; MilliporeSigma) was used for amplification of the mutant C228T fragment. High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to amplify the mutant insert. | BCa detection | AUC = 0.768, Se. = 55.56%, Sp. = 100% | retrospective | [ | ||
| DNA sequencing | diagnostic | Retrospective haematuria clinic cohort = 214 (BCa = 97, non-BCa = 117) | DNA extraction was performed with Quick-DNA urine kits (D3061; Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) on urine samples collected from all patients and quantified using high-sensitivity dsDNA Qubit kits (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Libraries were prepare using Nonacus Cell3 Target enrichment and sequenced on a NovaSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). | BCa detection | Se. = 87.6%, Sp. = 88.9% | retrospective | [ | |
| Prospective haematuria clinic cohort = 215 (BCa = 68, non-BCa = 147) | Se. = 86.8%, Sp. = 81.0% | prospective | ||||||
| NMIBC surveillance cohort = 293 (BCa = 29, non-BCa = 264) | Se. = 86.2%, Sp. = 62.5% | prospective | ||||||
| Control group = 162 (normal samples = 100, confirmatory control samples = 62) | Normal samples | retrospective | ||||||
| GWAS (rs9642880, rs710521) | prognostic | DNA was extracted from urine of 200 patients with Qiagen Kits (Hilden, Germany) and then measured on a Nanodrop ND-2000c (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCR was carried out using Bio-RAD T100Thermal cycler. Thermo Scientific FastDigestStyl was used to digest. Data analysis performed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). | BCa progression | No data | retrospective | [ |
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PCR—polymerase chain reaction, PPV—positive predictive value, NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, PIK3CA—Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha, AKT1—AKT Serine/Threonine Kinase 1, TERT—Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase, GWAS—Genome-wide association studies.
Table presenting data for metabolites biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive Capacity | Type of Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putative markers | diagnostic | Urine samples were collected from 124 patients and then derivatizated. GC-MS analysis was performed with Pegasus® 4D GC × GC-TOFMS (LECO, St. Joseph, MI, USA). | BCa vs. hernia differentiation | AUC = 0.976 | retrospective | [ | ||
| Urinary metabolomics | diagnostic | Metabolomics analysis on urine samples of 44 paitents was conducted with the Q300 Metabolite Assay Kit (Human Metabolomics Institute, Inc., Shenzen, Guangdong, China). Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (ACQUITY UPLC-Xevo TQ-S, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source was operated under positive and negative ion modes for the quantitation of metabolites. Data analysis performed with Targeted Metabolome Batch Quantification software (v1.0, Human Metabolomics Institute, Shenzen, Guangdong, China). | BCa detection | AUC = 0.983, Se. = 95.3%, Sp. = 100% | retrospective | [ |
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PPV—positive predictive value, NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, GC-MS—gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Table presenting data for others biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Purpose | Number of Patients | Method | Diagnostic Value | Prognostic Value | Predictive Capacity | Type of Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPAC | diagnostic | Urine samples collected from 103 patients were treated with 5-aimnolevulinic acid and then tested for protoporhyrin IX using Nikon ECLIPSE NI fluorescent microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). TP4303 solution was used to identify VPAC receptors under fluorescent microscope. | Detection of BCa | n/a | Se. = 89.23%, Sp. = 100% | prospective | [ | |
| utDNA | Prognostic and diagnostic | Urine and blood sample of 57 patients acquired on the day of RT. cfDNA was isolated from urine and purified by AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and then analyzed by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). | MRD detection | Predicting FPS and OS | AUC = 0.78, PPV = 88%, NPV = 72%, Se. = 81%, Sp. = 81% | Retrospective | [ | |
| CP | diagnostic | Urine collected from 273 patients was measured for CP levels using commercial ELISA kit (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Data analysis was performed using StatView (v 5.0, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA) | BCa progression | No data | retrospective | [ | ||
| MTC-PCR | prognostic | Urine samples of 123 patients collected after TURBT and before initiation of BCG instillation, and every year after the last BCG instillation, including induction and maintenance for up to 10 yr. DNA was purified from the pellet using a QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). MTC-PCR was used to detect the presence of mycobacterial DNA in urine samples. Statistical analysis performed with R software v.3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). | BCa progression and recurrence | [ | ||||
| Multiple Chromatographic Analysis (Fluorescent peak F) | diagnostic | Urine collected from 47 patients was filtered using a 0.22um nylon membrane filter-LLG Syringe Filter PTFE (AZ chrome, Bratislava, Slovak Republic). Urines samples were analyzed using RP-HPLC system Prominence 20A (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). Data analysis was performed using Software LC solution (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). | BCa vs. NMHU differentiation | AUC = 0.824, PPV = 78%, NPV = 88%, Se. = 90%, Sp. = 74% | retrospective | [ | ||
| miR-34a-5p, miR-205-3p, miR-210-3p | diagnostic | BenchMark XT immunostainer (Ventana Medycal Sysems, Tucson, AZ, USA) was used for immunohistochemical staining of tissue samples. The stains were inspected using an Olympus BX50 and Olympus BX46 mucroscopes (Olympus Europe) by two pathologists. | BCa detection | AUC = 0.92 | Prospective and retrospective | [ | ||
| Urinary VOC analysis | Diagnostic and surveillance | Urine samples of 305 patients were collected before cystoscopy. | BCa detection | retrospective | [ |
Abbreviations: AUC—Area under the ROC Curve, n—number of patients participating in study, HG—high grade, LG—low grade, BCa—bladder cancer, PCR—polymerase chain reaction, PPV—positive predictive value, NPV—negative predictive value, Se.—sensitivity, Sp.—specificity, cfDNA—cell-free DNA, utDNA—urine tumour DNA RP-HPLC—reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, ELISA—enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, uCAPP-Seq—urine Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing, VPAC—Combined vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide family of cell surface receptors, utDNA—urine tumour DNA, CP—Ceruloplasmin, MTC-PCR—Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex polymerase chain reaction, miR—microRNA, VOC—Volatile Organic Compounds.