| Literature DB >> 35092392 |
Samah Mamdouh1, Fatma Khorshed1, Gehan Hammad2, Khaled Elesaily3, Gehan Safwat2, Olfat Hammam4, Tarek Aboushousha4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a number of genetic variants associated with the susceptibility of bladder cancer (BC) in European and Chinese populations. Here, we assessed the association of two of these variants, rs9642880 and rs710521 in an Egyptian patients and also examined the expression of c-Myc.The basis was due to the absence of studies on Egyptian patients to determine the association between rs9642880& rs710521 and bladder cancer risk, particularly due to the known role of the variant (rs9642880) in the Progression and development of bladder cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Genotype; RFLP; bladder cancer; c-Myc; genome-wide association study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35092392 PMCID: PMC9258647 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.1.221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Demographic, Clinical and Histopathological Data of Bladder Cancer Patients
| Control | Cases | P- value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=50 | N=150 | |||
| Age | Mean±SD | 44.5±12.4 | 59.4±8.6 | 0.001** |
| Min - Max | 22.0 - 68.0 | 26.0 - 73.0 | ||
| Sex | Female | 17 (34.0%) | 21 (14.0%) | 0.1 |
| Male | 33 (66.0%) | 129 (86.0%) | ||
| Bilhariziasis | Negative | 50 (100.0%) | 33 (22.0%) | 0.001** |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 117 (78.0%) | ||
| Smoker | No | 50 (100.0%) | 39 (26.0%) | 0.001** |
| Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 111 (74.0%) | ||
| Clinical Ex. | Negative | 50 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | N.A |
| T1 | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (14.0%) | ||
| T2 | 0 (0.0%) | 75 (50.0%) | ||
| T3 | 0 (0.0%) | 54 (36.0%) | ||
| Cytology | Negative | 50 (100.0%) | 54 (36.0%) | 0.001** |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 96 (64.0%) | ||
| Histopathological characteristics | Negative | 50 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | N.A |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0 (0.0%) | 30 (20.0%) | ||
| Urothelial carcinoma | 0 (0.0%) | 120 (80.0%) | ||
| Stage of Tumor | Negative for malignancy | 50 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | N.A |
| Non muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (8.0%) | ||
| Muscle invasive bladder cancer(MIBC) | 0 (0.0%) | 123 (82.0%) | ||
| Superficial bladder cancer | 0 (0.0%) | 15 (10.0%) | ||
| Serum creatinine | Normal | 50 (100.0%) | 123 (82.0%) | 0.001** |
| High | 0 (0.0%) | 27 (18.0%) | ||
| Lymph node | Negative for malignancy | 50 (100.0%) | 75 (50.0%) | 0.001** |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 75 (50.0%) | ||
| Gradesof Tumor | Negative | 50 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | N.A |
| GI | 0 (0.0%) | 15 (10.0%) | ||
| GII | 0 (0.0%) | 39 (26.0%) | ||
| GIII | 0 (0.0%) | 96 (64.0%) |
Age is represented as Mean ± SD; the data were analyzed by student t test. While Sex, Bilhariziasis, Smoker, Clinical Ex., Cytology, Histopathological characteristics, Stage of Tumor, Serum creatinine, Lymph node, and Grades of Tumor are represented as F (%) frequency and percent; the data were analyzed by X2 test. * P-value <0.05 is significant, ** P. value <0.01 is highly significant.
Figure 1A, Electrophoresis in 3% agarose gel showed genotype patterns of rs9642880, M, DNA marker, genotypes (GT) ( TT) and(GG) in columns 1,2 and 3 respectively; B, The genotype patterns of rs710521, M, DNA marker, genotypes (AA) (AG) and (GG) in columns 1,2 and 3 respectively
Figure 2Forward Sequencing Peaks for PCR Amplified rs9642880 Fragment for three Different Bladder Cancer Patients. Graph A and B indicates that these two patients have GT genotype while graph C indicates that this patient has TT genotype. Related sequences in the region of rs9642880 polymorphism was highlighted in the sequence text, circled and underlined in the graph
Observed and Expected Variables Genotypes for Controls and Cases
| SNPs Genotype | N=50 | Observed results | Expected results | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Current Study) | (H-W equilibrium) | |||||
| Control | rs9642880 | GG | 27 | 0.54 | 0.196 | 0.69 |
| GT | 15 | 0.3 | 0.494 | |||
| TT | 8 | 0.16 | 0.31 | |||
| rs710521 | AA | 6 | 0.12 | 0.025 | 0.81 | |
| AG | 17 | 0.34 | 0.265 | |||
| GG | 27 | 0.54 | 0.71 | |||
| Total | 50 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Cases | rs9642880 | GG | 90 | 0.6 | 0.153 | 0.43 |
| GT | 9 | 0.06 | 0.477 | |||
| TT | 51 | 0.34 | 0.37 | |||
| rs710521 | AA | 30 | 0.2 | 0.06 | 0.8 | |
| AG | 69 | 0.46 | 0.37 | |||
| GG | 51 | 0.34 | 0.57 | |||
| Total | 150 | 1 | 1 |
H-W equilibrium, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; n, Number; P. Value is depending on the X2 test; *P. value <0.05 is significant,; ** P. value <0.01 is highly significant.
Genotyping Distribution of the Studied Variables
| SNPs | Genotype /Allele | Control | Cases | aP. value | OR | 95% C.I | bP. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=50 | N=150 | ||||||
| rs9642880 | GG | 27 (54.0%) | 90 (60.0%) | 0.2 | 1(reference) | ||
| GT | 15 (30.0%) | 9 (6.0%) | 0.001** | 0.18 | 0.071 - 0.457 | 0.001** | |
| TT | 8 (16.0%) | 51 (34.0%) | 0.01* | 1.912 | 0.809 - 4.522 | 0.03* | |
| G Allele | 69 (0.690) | 189 (0.630) | 0.3 | 1 (reference) | |||
| T Allele | 31 (0.310) | 111 (0.370) | 1.307 | 0.805 - 2.122 | 0.3 | ||
| rs710521 | AA | 6 (12.0%) | 30 (20.0%) | 0.06 | 1 (reference) | ||
| AG | 17 (34.0%) | 69 (46.0%) | 0.02* | 1.812 | 0.291 - 3.262 | 0.04* | |
| GG | 27 (54.0%) | 51 (34.0%) | 0.001** | 0.378 | 0.140 - 1.020 | 0.04* | |
| A Allele | 29 (0.290) | 129 (0.430) | 0.01* | 1.847 | 1.133 - 3.011 | 0.01* | |
| G Allele | 71 (0.710) | 171 (0.570) | 1 (reference) |
Genotype /Allele are represented as F (%) frequency and percent; the data were analyzed by X2 test; * P. value <0.05 is significant, ** P. value <0.01 is highly significant; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; *P value ≤ 0.05 significant; **P value ≤ 0.01 highly significant; aP. Value is depending on the X2 test, while bP. Value is depending onLogistic Regression analysis.
The Association between the Significant Genotypes of “rs9642880” with Bladder Cancer Risk
| rs9642880 | Associations | Risk assessment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT | TT | aP. value | OR | 95% C.I | bP. value | ||
| n=9 | n=51 | ||||||
| Sex | Female | 3 (33.3%) | 12 (23.5%) | 0.02* | 1.09 | 0.969 - 1.226 | 0.1 |
| Male | 6 (66.7%) | 39 (76.5%) | |||||
| Bilhariziasis | Negative | 3 (33.3%) | 18 (35.3%) | 0.6 | 0.917 | 0.204 - 4.109 | 0.9 |
| Positive | 6 (66.7%) | 33 (64.7%) | |||||
| Smoker | No | 3 (33.3%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.265 - 5.438 | 0.8 |
| Yes | 6 (66.7%) | 36 (70.6%) | |||||
| Clinical Ex. | T1 | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.2 | - | - | - |
| T2 | 6 (66.7%) | 21 (41.2%) | 0.01* | 3.5 | 1.413 - 8.672 | 0.01* | |
| T3 | 3 (33.3%) | 24 (47.1%) | 0.001** | 8 | 2.409 - 26.567 | 0.001** | |
| Cytology | Negative | 6 (66.7%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.03* | 4.8 | 1.059 - 21.753 | 0.04* |
| Positive | 3 (33.3%) | 36 (70.6%) | |||||
| Histopathological | Scc | 3 (33.3%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.265 - 5.438 | 0.8 |
| UC | 6 (66.7%) | 36 (70.6%) | |||||
| Stage | NMIBC | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (5.9%) | 0.4 | - | - | - |
| MIBC | 9 (100.0%) | 42 (82.4%) | 0.02* | 1.667 | 2.272 - 7.587 | 0.1 | |
| Superficial bladder cancer | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.2 | - | - | - | |
| Serum Creatinine | Normal | 6 (66.7%) | 39 (76.5%) | 0.4 | 0.615 | 0.133 - 2.841 | 0.5 |
| High | 3 (33.3%) | 12 (23.5%) | |||||
| Lymph Node | Negative | 0 (0.0%) | 27 (52.9%) | 0.03* | 0.111 | 0.013 - 0.954 | 0.06 |
| Positive | 9 (100.0%) | 24 (47.1%) | |||||
| Tumor Grade | GI | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.2 | - | - | - |
| GII | 3 (33.3%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.4 | 1.035 | 1.448 - 10.271 | 0.5 | |
| GIII | 6 (66.7%) | 30 (58.8%) | 0.1 | 1.123 | 2.081 - 8.013 | 0.2 | |
SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TCC, non-papillary transitional cell carcinoma; Ta, Superficial bladder cancer; NMIBC, Non muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, Muscle invasive bladder cancer; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; *P value ≤ 0.05 significant; **P value ≤ 0.01 highly significant; aP. Value is depending on the X2 test, while bP. Value is depending onLogistic Regression analysis.
The Association between the Significant Genotypes of “rs710521” with Bladder Cancer Risk
| rs710521 | Associations | Risk assessment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG | GG | aP. value | OR | 95% C.I | bP. value | ||
| n=69 | n=51 | ||||||
| Sex | Female | 12 (17.4%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.3 | 1.579 | 0.550 - 4.535 | 0.4 |
| Male | 57 (82.6%) | 45 (88.2%) | |||||
| Bilhariziasis | Negative | 9 (13.0%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.02* | 2.36 | 1.143 - 7.907 | 0.03* |
| Positive | 60 (87.0%) | 36 (70.6%) | |||||
| Smoker | No | 30 (43.5%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.1 | 0.769 | 0.174 - 1.307 | 0.1 |
| Yes | 39 (56.5%) | 45 (88.2%) | |||||
| Clinical Ex. | T1 | 30 (43.5%) | 33 (64.7%) | 0.01* | 1.1 | 0.671 - 1.804 | 0.7 |
| T2 | 12 (17.4%) | 3 (5.9%) | 0.01* | 4 | 1.129 - 14.175 | 0.03* | |
| T3 | 27 (39.1%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.04* | 1.9 | 0.958 - 3.384 | 0.05* | |
| Cytology | Negative | 21 (30.4%) | 15 (29.4%) | 0.5 | 1.05 | 0.476 - 2.316 | 0.9 |
| Positive | 48 (69.6%) | 36 (70.6%) | |||||
| Histopathological | Scc | 15 (21.7%) | 9 (17.6%) | 0.4 | 1.296 | 0.517 - 3.251 | 0.6 |
| UC | 54 (78.3%) | 42 (82.4%) | |||||
| Stage | NMIBC | 3 (4.3%) | 3 (5.9%) | 0.5 | 1 | 0.202 - 4.955 | 0.9 |
| MIBC | 57 (82.6%) | 42 (82.4%) | 0.9 | 1.357 | 0.911 - 2.022 | 0.1 | |
| Superficial bladder cancer | 9 (13.0%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.534 - 4.214 | 0.4 | |
| Serum Creatinine | Normal | 57 (82.6%) | 36 (70.6%) | 0.09 | 1.979 | 0.832 - 4.706 | 0.1 |
| High | 12 (17.4%) | 15 (29.4%) | |||||
| Lymph Node | Negative | 30 (43.5%) | 24 (47.1%) | 0.5 | 0.865 | 0.418 - 1.791 | 0.7 |
| Positive | 39 (56.5%) | 27 (52.9%) | |||||
| Tumor Grade | GI | 9 (13.0%) | 6 (11.8%) | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.534 - 4.214 | 0.4 |
| GII | 18 (26.1%) | 12 (23.5%) | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.723 - 3.114 | 0.3 | |
| GIII | 42 (60.9%) | 33 (64.7%) | 0.5 | 1.273 | 0.807 - 2.008 | 0.3 | |
SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TCC, non-papillary transitional cell carcinoma; Ta, Superficial bladder cancer; NMIBC, Non muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, Muscle invasive bladder cancer; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; *P value ≤ 0.05 significant; **P value ≤ 0.01 highly significant; aP. Value is depending on the X2 test, while bP. Value is depending onLogistic Regression analysis.
Figure 3Total Haplotype Association between Controls and Cases
Summary of Haplotype Association Analysis between Controls and Cases
| Haplotype association | Control | Cases | aP. value | OR | 95% CI | bP. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | |||||
| (1 0) TA | 14 (14.0%) | 45 (15.0%) | 0.8 | 1(reference) | ||
| (1 1) TG | 17 (17.0%) | 66 (22.0%) | 0.2 | 1.208 | 0.541 - 2.695 | 0.6 |
| (0 0) GA | 15 (15.0%) | 84 (28.0%) | 0.001** | 5.6 | 3.233 - 9.700 | 0.001** |
| (0 1) GG | 54 (54.0%) | 105 (35.0%) | 0.001** | 0.514 | 0.370 - 0.714 | 0.001** |
The data represented as frequency and percent for the studied variants associations; The sequence of alleles depending on the following variable order respectively: rs9642880, rs710521; Binary haploid data observed for RFLP- PCR (0 if absent, 1 if Present); OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; *P value ≤ 0.05 significant; **P value ≤ 0.01 highly significant; aP. Value is depending on the X2 test, while bP. Value is depending onLogistic Regression analysis
Figure 4a, Section in urinary bladder tissue of mild case of cystitis showing discrete nuclear and cystoplasmic spots of c-Myc positivity within the urothelium (c-Myc IHC, DAB, x400); b, Moderate nuclear positivity in papillary low grade TCC (c-Myc IHC, DAB, x200); c, Dense diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity in case of MIBC of high grade TCC (c-Myc IHC, DAB, x200); d, Dense patchy positivity in case of MIBC of SCC type (c-Myc IHC, DAB, x200)
Differential Expression of c-Myc in Relation to Variable Histopathological Parameters of Bladder Cancer
| Histopathological | N | Mean | Std. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nonmalignant & cystitis | 50 | 44.17 | 41.17 |
| UC (all) | 122 | 176.41## | 97.36 |
| PTCC | 41 | 162.5 | 115.51A |
| TCC | 81 | 177.50$ | 84.97 |
| SCC | 28 | 220.03##* | 64.49 |
| BILHARZIASIS | |||
| POSITIVE | 119 | 183.44 | 96.36 |
| NEGATIVE | 31 | 130.85** | 64.37 |
| GRADE | |||
| G1 | 21 | 82.5 | 58.77 |
| G2 | 34 | 221.11^^ | 60.28 |
| G3 | 95 | 285.00^^$$ | 17.32 |
| STAGE | |||
| Ta | 14 | 42.5 | 8.66 |
| NMIBC | 14 | 160.47@@ | 82.46 |
| MIBC | 122 | 241.43@@"" | 63.35 |
| Histopathological | N | Mean | Std. |
| LYMPH NODES | |||
| -ve | 75 | 151.36 | 96.36 |
| +ve | 75 | 231.67&& | 63.37 |
| Total | 200 | 144.35 | 102.29 |
UC, urothelial carcinoma; PTCC, Papillary transitional cell carcinoma; TCC, non-papillary transitional cell carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; Ta, Superficial bladder cancer; NMIBC, Non muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, Muscle invasive bladder cancer; ##, High significant difference with non-malignant cases; $, Significant difference with PTCC; *, Significant difference with UC; **, High significant difference with positive bilharzial cases; ^^, High significant difference with G1; $$, High significant difference with G2; @@, High significant difference with Ta; "", High significant difference with NMIBC; &&, High significant difference with +ve LN.