| Literature DB >> 35317488 |
Hajar El Ahanidi1,2, Meryem El Azzouzi1,2, Housna Arrouchi2, Chaimae Hafidi Alaoui1, Mohammed Tetou3, Mounia Bensaid3, Mohamed Oukabli2,3, Ahmed Ameur2,3, Abderrahmane Al Bouzidi2, Mohammed El Mzibri1, Mohammed Attaleb1.
Abstract
Introduction: in cancer cells, activating mutations in PIK3CA and AKT1 genes, major players of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling pathway, are widely reported in many cancers and present attractive targets for the identification of new therapeutics and better cancer management. The present study was planned to evaluate the mutational status of PIK3CA and AKT1 genes in bladder cancer patients and to assess the association between these mutations and patients´ clinico-pathological features.Entities:
Keywords: AKT1; Bladder cancer; Moroccan patients; PIK3CA; activating mutations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35317488 PMCID: PMC8917451 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.59.31383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
tumour characteristics of people with bladder cancer
| Parameter | Total cases | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 68 | 97.1 |
| Female | 2 | 2.9 |
| Age | ||
| <50 | 1 | 1.4 |
| 50-70 | 44 | 62.9 |
| >70 | 25 | 35.7 |
| Smoking | ||
| Yes | 28 | 40 |
| No | 42 | 60 |
| Tumour stage | ||
| ≤PT1 | 52 | 74.3 |
| >PT1 | 18 | 25.7 |
| Tumour grade | ||
| Low grade | 27 | 38.6 |
| High grade | 43 | 61.4 |
| Tumour recurrence | ||
| Yes | 12 | 23.1 |
| No | 40 | 76.9 |
| Tumour progression | ||
| Yes | 5 | 9.6 |
| No | 47 | 90.4 |
distribution of PIK3CA and AKT1 genes mutations according to clinicopathological parameters
| Parameter | PIK3CA | AKT1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall n=9 | Overall n=1 | |||
| + | - | + | - | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 9 | 59 | 1 | 67 |
| Female | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| P value | 0.999 | 1 | ||
|
| ||||
| < 50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 50 -70 | 7 | 36 | 1 | 43 |
| > 70 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 25 |
| P value | 0.703 | 0.410 | ||
|
| ||||
| Yes | 3 | 25 | 1 | 27 |
| No | 6 | 36 | 0 | 42 |
| P value | 0.525 | 0.997 | ||
|
| ||||
| ≤ PT1 | 8 | 44 | 1 | 51 |
| >PT1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 18 |
| P value | 0.998 | 0.998 | ||
|
| ||||
| LG | 3 | 24 | 0 | 27 |
| HG | 6 | 37 | 1 | 42 |
| P value | 0.512 | 0.998 | ||
|
| ||||
| Yes | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| No | 9 | 31 | 1 | 39 |
| P value | 0.999 | 0.999 | ||
|
| ||||
| Yes | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| No | 9 | 38 | 1 | 46 |
| P value | 0.999 | 0.999 | ||
comparison between mutational status in bladder biopsies and voided urine sediments
| Genes | Mutations in fresh biopsies | Mutations in urine sediments | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Specificity % (95% CI) | Hematuria % (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % (95% CI) | N | % (95% CI) | ||||
| PIK3CA | 9 | 12.6 (6.1-23) | 6 | 8.6 (3.2-17.7) | 66.7 (29.9-92.5) | 100 (94.9-100) | 100 (66.4-100) |
| AKT1 | 1 | 1.4 (0-7.7) | 1 | 1.4 (0-7.7) | 100 (2.5-100) | 100 (94.9-100) | 100 (2.5-100) |
CI = confidence interval. The sensitivity reflects the fraction of patients in which the urine DNA was mutated among cases with mutation in matched tumour DNA of the same genes.