G Cancel-Tassin1,2, M Roupret1,3, U Pinar1, C Gaffory1,2, F Vanie3, V Ondet1, E Compérat1,2,3, Olivier Cussenot4,5. 1. Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Service d'Urologie-Batiment Gabriel, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France. 2. CeRePP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020, Paris, France. 3. Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France. 4. Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Service d'Urologie-Batiment Gabriel, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France. olivier.cussenot@aphp.fr. 5. CeRePP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020, Paris, France. olivier.cussenot@aphp.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of the Xpert Bladder Cancer (BC) Monitor during the follow-up of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: Patients with previously diagnosed NMIBC and followed up in clinical practice settings in two French urology departments between September 2017 and July 2019 were consecutively enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients with a positive cystoscopy or computed tomography urogram underwent subsequent transurethral resection of the bladder, and/or biopsy, and the specimens were pathologically assessed. Cytology and Xpert BC Monitor tests were performed on urine samples. Xpert BC Monitor performance was assessed versus cystoscopy for disease-negative patients or versus histology for disease-positive patients, and was compared to that of cytology. RESULTS: Overall, 500 patients with a median age of 70.0 years were included. NMIBC recurrence was diagnosed in 44 cases (8.8%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 72.7% (32/44), 73.7% (330/448) and 96.5% (330/342) for the Xpert BC Monitor, and 7.7% (2/26), 97.8% (310/317) and 92.8% (310/334) for cytology, respectively. The Xpert BC Monitor detected 92.3% (12/13) of the high-grade tumours and ruled out their presence in 99.7% (330/331) of cases. Analysis of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated the superior performance of the Xpert BC Monitor over that of cytology. CONCLUSION: Xpert BC Monitor performance was superior to that of cytology in the follow-up of NMIBC. The exclusion of aggressive tumours with a very high NPV (99.7%) supports the use of this urinary test in daily practice.
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of the Xpert Bladder Cancer (BC) Monitor during the follow-up of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: Patients with previously diagnosed NMIBC and followed up in clinical practice settings in two French urology departments between September 2017 and July 2019 were consecutively enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients with a positive cystoscopy or computed tomography urogram underwent subsequent transurethral resection of the bladder, and/or biopsy, and the specimens were pathologically assessed. Cytology and Xpert BC Monitor tests were performed on urine samples. Xpert BC Monitor performance was assessed versus cystoscopy for disease-negative patients or versus histology for disease-positive patients, and was compared to that of cytology. RESULTS: Overall, 500 patients with a median age of 70.0 years were included. NMIBC recurrence was diagnosed in 44 cases (8.8%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 72.7% (32/44), 73.7% (330/448) and 96.5% (330/342) for the Xpert BC Monitor, and 7.7% (2/26), 97.8% (310/317) and 92.8% (310/334) for cytology, respectively. The Xpert BC Monitor detected 92.3% (12/13) of the high-grade tumours and ruled out their presence in 99.7% (330/331) of cases. Analysis of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated the superior performance of the Xpert BC Monitor over that of cytology. CONCLUSION: Xpert BC Monitor performance was superior to that of cytology in the follow-up of NMIBC. The exclusion of aggressive tumours with a very high NPV (99.7%) supports the use of this urinary test in daily practice.
Authors: Robert S Svatek; Brent K Hollenbeck; Sten Holmäng; Richard Lee; Simon P Kim; Arnulf Stenzl; Yair Lotan Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: F Johannes P van Valenberg; Andrew M Hiar; Ellen Wallace; Julia A Bridge; Donna J Mayne; Safedin Beqaj; Wade J Sexton; Yair Lotan; Alon Z Weizer; Godfrey K Jansz; Arnulf Stenzl; John F Danella; Barry Shepard; Kevin J Cline; Michael B Williams; Scott Montgomery; Richard D David; Richard Harris; Eric W Klein; Timothy J Bradford; Fred N Wolk; Karl R Westenfelder; Andrew F Trainer; Timothy A Richardson; Russell B Egerdie; Bernard Goldfarb; Joseph A Zadra; Sijian Ge; Suling Zhao; Iris M Simon; Scott A Campbell; Brian Rhees; Michael P Bates; Russell G Higuchi; J Alfred Witjes Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Morgan Roupret; Paolo Gontero; Stuart R C McCracken; Tim Dudderidge; Jacqueline Stockley; Ashleigh Kennedy; Oscar Rodriguez; Caroline Sieverink; Felicien Vanié; Marco Allasia; J Alfred Witjes; Marc Colombel; Richard Sylvester; Fabrizio Longo; Emanuele Montanari; Joan Palou Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ellen Wallace; Russell Higuchi; Malini Satya; Leena McCann; Mandy L Y Sin; Julia A Bridge; Huilin Wei; Jun Zhang; Edith Wong; Andrew Hiar; Kathleen E Mach; Douglas Scherr; R Blair Egerdie; Shoichiro Ohta; Wade J Sexton; Maxwell V Meng; Alon Z Weizer; Michael Woods; G Kenneth Jansz; Joseph Zadra; Yair Lotan; Bernard Goldfarb; Joseph C Liao Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Richard J Sylvester; Adrian P M van der Meijden; Willem Oosterlinck; J Alfred Witjes; Christian Bouffioux; Louis Denis; Donald W W Newling; Karlheinz Kurth Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Maximilian Burger; Eva M Compérat; Paolo Gontero; A Hugh Mostafid; Joan Palou; Bas W G van Rhijn; Morgan Rouprêt; Shahrokh F Shariat; Richard Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; José Luis Dominguez Escrig; Virginia Hernández; Benoit Peyronnet; Thomas Seisen; Viktor Soukup Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Francesco Soria; Michael J Droller; Yair Lotan; Paolo Gontero; David D'Andrea; Kilian M Gust; Morgan Rouprêt; Marek Babjuk; Joan Palou; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Vittorio Fasulo; Marco Paciotti; Massimo Lazzeri; Roberto Contieri; Paolo Casale; Alberto Saita; Giovanni Lughezzani; Pietro Diana; Nicola Frego; Pier Paolo Avolio; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Grazia Maria Elefante; Giorgio Guazzoni; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Michael Bates; Rodolfo Hurle Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Soum D Lokeshwar; Maite Lopez; Semih Sarcan; Karina Aguilar; Daley S Morera; Devin M Shaheen; Bal L Lokeshwar; Vinata B Lokeshwar Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Rafaela Malinaric; Guglielmo Mantica; Lorenzo Lo Monaco; Federico Mariano; Rosario Leonardi; Alchiede Simonato; André Van der Merwe; Carlo Terrone Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 4.614