Literature DB >> 35951085

Endorectal ultrasound radiomics in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: despeckling and radiotherapy response prediction using machine learning.

Samira Abbaspour1,2, Hamid Abdollahi3,4, Hossein Arabalibeik5, Maedeh Barahman6, Amir Mohammad Arefpour6, Pedram Fadavi7, Mohammadreza Ay8,9, Seied Rabi Mahdavi10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to evaluate the association of endorectal ultrasound (EUS) radiomics features at different denoising filters based on machine learning algorithms and to predict radiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.
METHODS: The EUS images of forty-three LARC patients, as a predictive biomarker for predicting the treatment response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), were investigated. For despeckling, the EUS images were preprocessed by traditional filters (bilateral, wiener, lee, frost, median, and wavelet filters). The rectal tumors were delineated by two readers separately, and radiomics features were extracted. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used for feature selection. Classifiers including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest, naive Bayes, and decision tree were trained using stratified fivefold cross-validation for model development. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve followed by accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were obtained for model performance assessment.
RESULTS: The wavelet filter had the best results with means of AUC: 0.83, accuracy: 77.41%, precision: 82.15%, and sensitivity: 79.41%. LR and SVM by having AUC: 0.71 and 0.76; accuracy: 70.0% and 71.5%; precision: 75.0% and 73.0%; sensitivity: 69.8% and 80.2%; and specificity: 70.0% and 60.9% had the highest model's performance, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the EUS-based radiomics model could serve as pretreatment biomarkers in predicting pathologic features of rectal cancer. The wavelet filter and machine learning methods (LR and SVM) had good results on the EUS images of rectal cancer.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denoising filters; Machine learning; Radiomics features; Rectal cancer; Treatment response; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35951085     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03625-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  19 in total

1.  Despeckle filtering software toolbox for ultrasound imaging of the common carotid artery.

Authors:  Christos P Loizou; Charoula Theofanous; Marios Pantziaris; Takis Kasparis
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanfen Cui; Xiaotang Yang; Zhongqiang Shi; Zhao Yang; Xiaosong Du; Zhikai Zhao; Xintao Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Repeatability of radiomic features in magnetic resonance imaging of glioblastoma: Test-retest and image registration analyses.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Ghasem Hajianfar; Ahmad Sohrabi; Hamid Abdollahi; Sajad P Shayesteh; Parham Geramifar; Habib Zaidi; Mehrdad Oveisi; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Assessment of Rectal Tumors with Shear-Wave Elastography before Surgery: Comparison with Endorectal US.

Authors:  Li-Da Chen; Wei Wang; Jian-Bo Xu; Jian-Hui Chen; Xin-Hua Zhang; Hui Wu; Jin-Ning Ye; Jin-Ya Liu; Zhi-Qiang Nie; Ming-De Lu; Xiao-Yan Xie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  How useful is rectal endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Taylan Kav; Yusuf Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Preoperative prediction of tumour deposits in rectal cancer by an artificial neural network-based US radiomics model.

Authors:  Li-Da Chen; Wei Li; Meng-Fei Xian; Xin Zheng; Yuan Lin; Bao-Xian Liu; Man-Xia Lin; Xin Li; Yan-Ling Zheng; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Ming Kuang; Jian-Bo Xu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  A review in radiomics: Making personalized medicine a reality via routine imaging.

Authors:  Julien Guiot; Akshayaa Vaidyanathan; Louis Deprez; Fadila Zerka; Denis Danthine; Anne-Noelle Frix; Philippe Lambin; Fabio Bottari; Nathan Tsoutzidis; Benjamin Miraglio; Sean Walsh; Wim Vos; Roland Hustinx; Marta Ferreira; Pierre Lovinfosse; Ralph T H Leijenaar
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 12.944

Review 8.  Emerging applications of radiomics in rectal cancer: State of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Min Hou; Ji-Hong Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  MRI-based clinical-radiomics model predicts tumor response before treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Delli Pizzi; Antonio Maria Chiarelli; Piero Chiacchiaretta; Martina d'Annibale; Pierpaolo Croce; Consuelo Rosa; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Stefano Trebeschi; Doenja Marina Johanna Lambregts; Daniele Caposiena; Francesco Lorenzo Serafini; Raffaella Basilico; Giulio Cocco; Pierluigi Di Sebastiano; Sebastiano Cinalli; Antonio Ferretti; Richard Geoffrey Wise; Domenico Genovesi; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Massimo Caulo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.