Literature DB >> 31828415

Preoperative prediction of tumour deposits in rectal cancer by an artificial neural network-based US radiomics model.

Li-Da Chen1, Wei Li1, Meng-Fei Xian2, Xin Zheng1, Yuan Lin3, Bao-Xian Liu1, Man-Xia Lin1, Xin Li4, Yan-Ling Zheng1, Xiao-Yan Xie1, Ming-De Lu1,5, Ming Kuang1,5, Jian-Bo Xu6, Wei Wang7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a machine learning-based ultrasound (US) radiomics model for predicting tumour deposits (TDs) preoperatively.
METHODS: From December 2015 to December 2017, 127 patients with rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled and divided into training and validation sets. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) examinations were conducted for each patient. A total of 4176 US radiomics features were extracted for each patient. After the reduction and selection of US radiomics features , a predictive model using an artificial neural network (ANN) was constructed in the training set. Furthermore, two models (one incorporating clinical information and one based on MRI radiomics) were developed. These models were validated by assessing their diagnostic performance and comparing the areas under the curve (AUCs) in the validation set.
RESULTS: The training and validation sets included 29 (33.3%) and 11 (27.5%) patients with TDs, respectively. A US radiomics ANN model was constructed. The model for predicting TDs showed an accuracy of 75.0% in the validation cohort. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and AUC were 72.7%, 75.9%, 53.3%, 88.0% and 0.743, respectively. For the model incorporating clinical information, the AUC improved to 0.795. Although the AUC of the US radiomics model was improved compared with that of the MRI radiomics model (0.916 vs. 0.872) in the 90 patients with both ultrasound and MRI data (which included both the training and validation sets), the difference was nonsignificant (p = 0.384).
CONCLUSIONS: US radiomics may be a potential model to accurately predict TDs before therapy. KEY POINTS: • We prospectively developed an artificial neural network model for predicting tumour deposits based on US radiomics that had an accuracy of 75.0%. • The area under the curve of the US radiomics model was improved than that of the MRI radiomics model (0.916 vs. 0.872), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.384). • The US radiomics-based model may potentially predict TDs accurately before therapy, but this model needs further validation with larger samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Rectal neoplasms; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31828415     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06558-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: stiffness value and ratio to discriminate malignant from benign focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Qiang Lu; Wenwu Ling; Changli Lu; Jiawu Li; Lin Ma; Jierong Quan; Du He; Jianping Liu; Jiaying Yang; Tianfu Wen; Hong Wu; Hongguang Zhu; Yan Luo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of real-time shear-wave elastography.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Correas; Anne-Marie Tissier; Ahmed Khairoune; Viorel Vassiliu; Arnaud Méjean; Olivier Hélénon; Richard Memo; Richard G Barr
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  How useful is rectal endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Taylan Kav; Yusuf Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Is the seventh edition of the UICC/AJCC TNM staging system reasonable for patients with tumor deposits in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Lin-lin Tong; Peng Gao; Zhen-ning Wang; Yong-xi Song; Ying-ying Xu; Zhe Sun; Cheng-zhong Xing; Hui-mian Xu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Tumor deposits in rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation are associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Purva Gopal; Pengcheng Lu; Gregory D Ayers; Alan J Herline; Mary K Washington
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer: Improving the Value of Modern Staging-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Nikki Knijn; Niek Hugen; Helen C Marshall; Kenichi Sugihara; Tibor Tot; Hideki Ueno; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Can the tumor deposits be counted as metastatic lymph nodes in the UICC TNM staging system for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Yong-Xi Song; Peng Gao; Zhen-Ning Wang; Ji-Wang Liang; Zhe Sun; Mei-Xian Wang; Yu-Lan Dong; Xin-Fang Wang; Hui-Mian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tumor deposits counted as positive lymph nodes in TNM staging for advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Shengke Yang; Junjie Hu; Hao Liu; Feng Du; Jie Yin; Sai Liu; Ci Li; Shasha Xing; Jiatian Yuan; Bo Lv; Jun Fan; Shusheng Leng; Xin Zhang; Bing Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-05

10.  Novel lymph node ratio predicts prognosis of colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery when tumor deposits are counted as positive lymph nodes: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Shasha Xing; Jun Li; Shengke Yang; Junjie Hu; Hao Liu; Feng Du; Jie Yin; Sai Liu; Ci Li; Jiatian Yuan; Bo Lv
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Endorectal ultrasound radiomics in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: despeckling and radiotherapy response prediction using machine learning.

Authors:  Samira Abbaspour; Hamid Abdollahi; Hossein Arabalibeik; Maedeh Barahman; Amir Mohammad Arefpour; Pedram Fadavi; Mohammadreza Ay; Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-11

2.  Artificial Neural Network-Based Ultrasound Radiomics Can Predict Large-Volume Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical N0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Wan Zhu; Xingzhi Huang; Qi Qi; Zhenghua Wu; Xiang Min; Aiyun Zhou; Pan Xu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.501

3.  Radiomic Feature-Based Predictive Model for Microvascular Invasion in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mu He; Peng Zhang; Xiao Ma; Baochun He; Chihua Fang; Fucang Jia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC): a comparison of predictive performance of multiple classifiers modeling to identify cervical lymph node metastases before surgery.

Authors:  Hui Qin; Qiao Que; Peng Lin; Xin Li; Xin-Rong Wang; Yun He; Jun-Qiang Chen; Hong Yang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Automated detection and delineation of hepatocellular carcinoma on multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI using deep learning.

Authors:  Khaled Bousabarah; Brian Letzen; Jonathan Tefera; Lynn Savic; Isabel Schobert; Todd Schlachter; Lawrence H Staib; Martin Kocher; Julius Chapiro; MingDe Lin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-06-04

6.  Clinical Value of Machine Learning-Based Ultrasomics in Preoperative Differentiation Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Shanshan Ren; Qian Li; Shunhua Liu; Qinghua Qi; Shaobo Duan; Bing Mao; Xin Li; Yuejin Wu; Lianzhong Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yumei Jin; Mou Li; Yali Zhao; Chencui Huang; Siyun Liu; Shengmei Liu; Min Wu; Bin Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Differentiation between combined hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic performance between ultrasomics-based model and CEUS LI-RADS v2017.

Authors:  Chao-Qun Li; Xin Zheng; Huan-Ling Guo; Mei-Qing Cheng; Yang Huang; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-de Lu; Ming Kuang; Wei Wang; Li-da Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.795

9.  Abnormal white matter within brain structural networks is associated with high-impulse behaviour in codeine-containing cough syrup dependent users.

Authors:  Yunfan Wu; Zhihua Zhou; Meng Li; Xiaofen Ma; Zhihong Lan; Jin Fang; Shishun Fu; Kanghui Yu; Yi Yin; Shoujun Xu; Cuihua Gao; Jianneng Li; Guihua Jiang
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Application of the Preoperative Assistant System Based on Machine Learning in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection.

Authors:  Shouyun Lv; Shizong Li; Zhiwei Yu; Kaiqiong Wang; Xin Qiao; Dongwei Gong; Changxiong Wu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.