Literature DB >> 28640694

Assessment of Rectal Tumors with Shear-Wave Elastography before Surgery: Comparison with Endorectal US.

Li-Da Chen1, Wei Wang1, Jian-Bo Xu1, Jian-Hui Chen1, Xin-Hua Zhang1, Hui Wu1, Jin-Ning Ye1, Jin-Ya Liu1, Zhi-Qiang Nie1, Ming-De Lu1, Xiao-Yan Xie1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare the value of endorectal ultrasonography (US) with shear-wave elastography (SWE) in staging rectal tumors before surgery. Materials and Methods This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained. In a pilot cohort from April 2015 to January 2016, 70 patients with rectal adenocarcinomas and/or adenomas confirmed with histopathologic examination underwent both endorectal US and SWE. Tumor stiffness and three regions of reference backgrounds, as well as tumor stiffness ratios (SRs) versus these backgrounds, were analyzed. The optimal staging feature was selected by using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the concordance rate with pathologic stage was analyzed and compared with endorectal US. The results were validated in an independent cohort of 30 patients from February 2016 to July 2016. Results In the pilot study, from rectal adenoma to stage T3 cancers, the tumor stiffness, stiffness of peritumoral fat, tumor SR versus distant perirectal fat, and tumor SR versus normal rectal wall were significantly increased (all P < .05, correlation coefficients between SWE features and pathologic T stages were 0.589-0.853). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of tumor staging demonstrated that tumor stiffness was the optimal feature with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.991-1.000). The cutoff values of stage T1, T2, and T3 cancers were 26.9 kPa, 70.3 kPa, and 112.0 kPa, respectively. For SWE, the diagnostic concordance rate with pathologic stage (95.7%, weighted κ = 0.962) was higher than that of endorectal US (75.7%, weighted κ = 0.756). In the validation cohort, similar findings were revealed for diagnostic concordance rate (93.3% vs 76.7%; weighted κ = 0.927 vs 0.651) and diagnostic performance of tumor staging (AUC = 0.950-1.000 vs 0.700-0.833). Conclusion By using the feature of tumor stiffness at SWE, the accuracy of preoperative staging for rectal tumors was improved compared with endorectal US in the pilot study, but was not significantly different in the validation cohort, potentially due to small sample size. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640694     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Endorectal ultrasound radiomics in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: despeckling and radiotherapy response prediction using machine learning.

Authors:  Samira Abbaspour; Hamid Abdollahi; Hossein Arabalibeik; Maedeh Barahman; Amir Mohammad Arefpour; Pedram Fadavi; Mohammadreza Ay; Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-11

2.  Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Shear Wave Elastography in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Martina Kastrup Loft; Malene Roland Vils Pedersen; Peter Grimm; Andreas Hoffmann Lauritzen; Claus Dam; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Preoperative prediction of tumour deposits in rectal cancer by an artificial neural network-based US radiomics model.

Authors:  Li-Da Chen; Wei Li; Meng-Fei Xian; Xin Zheng; Yuan Lin; Bao-Xian Liu; Man-Xia Lin; Xin Li; Yan-Ling Zheng; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Ming Kuang; Jian-Bo Xu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Using shear wave elasticity in normal terminal ileum of a healthy southwest Chinese population: a pilot study of reference elasticity ranges.

Authors:  Jie-Ying Zhao; Xin Gao; Hua Zhuang; Yu-Ting Wu; Yuan Luo; Ji-Gang Jing; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

5.  Esophagus involvement in systemic sclerosis: ultrasound parameters and association with clinical manifestations.

Authors:  Li Ma; Qingli Zhu; Yan Zhang; Jianchu Li; Yuxin Jiang; Dong Xu; Xiaofeng Zeng; Yong Hou; He Liu
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Rectal Tumor Stiffness Quantified by In Vivo Tomoelastography and Collagen Content Estimated by Histopathology Predict Tumor Aggressiveness.

Authors:  Jiaxi Hu; Jing Guo; Yigang Pei; Ping Hu; Mengsi Li; Ingolf Sack; Wenzheng Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Kang-Ning Li; Ai-Jiao Yi; Bin Wang; Qi Wei; Ge-Ge Wu; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.275

8.  Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in the Assessment of Rectal Tumors: How Well Does It Work in Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Adrian Catinean; Gheorghe G Balan; Anita Mezei; Emil-Claudiu Botan; Andrei-Otto Mitre; Radu Motocu; Florin Graur; Dan-Tudor Eniu; Maria-Adriana Neag
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.