| Literature DB >> 34309893 |
Julien Guiot1, Akshayaa Vaidyanathan2,3, Louis Deprez4, Fadila Zerka2,3, Denis Danthine4, Anne-Noelle Frix1, Philippe Lambin3, Fabio Bottari2, Nathan Tsoutzidis2, Benjamin Miraglio2, Sean Walsh2, Wim Vos2, Roland Hustinx5,6, Marta Ferreira6, Pierre Lovinfosse5, Ralph T H Leijenaar2.
Abstract
Radiomics is the quantitative analysis of standard-of-care medical imaging; the information obtained can be applied within clinical decision support systems to create diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive models. Radiomics analysis can be performed by extracting hand-crafted radiomics features or via deep learning algorithms. Radiomics has evolved tremendously in the last decade, becoming a bridge between imaging and precision medicine. Radiomics exploits sophisticated image analysis tools coupled with statistical elaboration to extract the wealth of information hidden inside medical images, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and/or Positron emission tomography (PET) scans, routinely performed in the everyday clinical practice. Many efforts have been devoted in recent years to the standardization and validation of radiomics approaches, to demonstrate their usefulness and robustness beyond any reasonable doubts. However, the booming of publications and commercial applications of radiomics approaches warrant caution and proper understanding of all the factors involved to avoid "scientific pollution" and overly enthusiastic claims by researchers and clinicians alike. For these reasons the present review aims to be a guidebook of sorts, describing the process of radiomics, its pitfalls, challenges, and opportunities, along with its ability to improve clinical decision-making, from oncology and respiratory medicine to pharmacological and genotyping studies.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep learning; machine learning; personalized medicine; radiomics
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34309893 DOI: 10.1002/med.21846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Res Rev ISSN: 0198-6325 Impact factor: 12.944