Literature DB >> 33452363

Implicit motor learning within three trials.

Jennifer E Ruttle1,2, Bernard Marius 't Hart3,4, Denise Y P Henriques3,5,4.   

Abstract

In motor learning, the slow development of implicit learning is traditionally taken for granted. While much is known about training performance during adaptation to a perturbation in reaches, saccades and locomotion, little is known about the time course of the underlying implicit processes during normal motor adaptation. Implicit learning is characterized by both changes in internal models and state estimates of limb position. Here, we measure both as reach aftereffects and shifts in hand localization in our participants, after every training trial. The observed implicit changes were near asymptote after only one to three perturbed training trials and were not predicted by a two-rate model's slow process that is supposed to capture implicit learning. Hence, we show that implicit learning is much faster than conventionally believed, which has implications for rehabilitation and skills training.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33452363      PMCID: PMC7810862          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81031-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Blocking trial-by-trial error correction does not interfere with motor learning in human walking.

Authors:  Andrew W Long; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Estimating the implicit component of visuomotor rotation learning by constraining movement preparation time.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Reece Gunn; Welber Marinovic; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Somatosensory plasticity and motor learning.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Mohammad Darainy; Andrew A G Mattar; Jeremy Wong; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior.

Authors:  Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner; Peter Thier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Actin-related proteins regulate the RSC chromatin remodeler by weakening intramolecular interactions of the Sth1 ATPase.

Authors:  Bengi Turegun; Richard W Baker; Andres E Leschziner; Roberto Dominguez
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-01-22
View more
  6 in total

1.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 2.  What triggers explicit awareness in implicit sequence learning? Implications from theories of consciousness.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Clarissa Lustig; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 3.  Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.

Authors:  Joshua D Bell; Kristen L Macuga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-23

4.  Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Alissa R Stover; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  A single exposure to altered auditory feedback causes observable sensorimotor adaptation in speech.

Authors:  Lana Hantzsch; Benjamin Parrell; Caroline A Niziolek
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Understanding implicit sensorimotor adaptation as a process of proprioceptive re-alignment.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Hyosub Kim; Adrian M Haith; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 8.713

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.