Literature DB >> 32212105

The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation.

Daniel R Lametti1,2, Marcus Y M Quek3, Calum B Prescott3, John-Stuart Brittain4, Kate E Watkins3.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the adaptive processes that shape sensorimotor behavior is largely derived from studying isolated movements. Studies of visuomotor adaptation, in which participants adapt cursor movements to rotations of the cursor's screen position, have led to prominent theories of motor control. In response to changes in visual feedback of movements, explicit (cognitive) and implicit (automatic) learning processes adapt movements to counter errors. However, movements rarely occur in isolation. The extent to which explicit and implicit processes drive sensorimotor adaptation when multiple movements occur simultaneously, as in the real world, remains unclear. Here we address this problem in the context of speech and hand movements. Participants spoke in-time with rapid, hand-driven cursor movements. Using real-time alterations of vowel sound feedback, and visual rotations of the cursor's screen position, we induced sensorimotor adaptation in one or both movements simultaneously. Across three experiments (n = 60, n = 48 and n = 76, respectively), we demonstrate that visuomotor adaptation is markedly impaired by simultaneous speech adaptation, and the impairment is specific to the explicit learning process in visuomotor adaptation. In contrast, visuomotor adaptation had no impact on speech adaptation. The results demonstrate that the explicit learning process in visuomotor adaptation is sensitive to movements in other motor domains. They suggest that some forms of speech adaptation may lack an explicit learning process altogether.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; Sensorimotor adaptation; Speech production; Visuomotor adaptation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32212105     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01725-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Differential Effects of Cerebellar Degeneration on Feedforward versus Feedback Control across Speech and Reaching Movements.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Hyosub E Kim; Assaf Breska; Arohi Saxena; Richard Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Disruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Ding-Lan Tang; Alexander McDaniel; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Novelty exposure induces stronger sensorimotor representations during a manual adaptation task.

Authors:  Marit F L Ruitenberg; Vincent Koppelmans; Rachael D Seidler; Judith Schomaker
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.499

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.