Literature DB >> 35916740

PreS/MD: Predictor of Sensitization Hazard for Chemical Substances Released From Medical Devices.

Vinicius M Alves1, Joyce V B Borba1, Rodolpho C Braga2, Daniel R Korn1, Nicole Kleinstreuer3, Kevin Causey4, Alexander Tropsha1,4, Diego Rua5, Eugene N Muratov1.   

Abstract

In the United States, a pre-market regulatory submission for any medical device that comes into contact with either a patient or the clinical practitioner must include an adequate toxicity evaluation of chemical substances that can be released from the device during its intended use. These substances, also referred to as extractables and leachables, must be evaluated for their potential to induce sensitization/allergenicity, which traditionally has been done in animal assays such as the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). However, advances in basic and applied science are continuously presenting opportunities to employ new approach methodologies, including computational methods which, when qualified, could replace animal testing methods to support regulatory submissions. Herein, we developed a new computational tool for rapid and accurate prediction of the GPMT outcome that we have named PreS/MD (predictor of sensitization for medical devices). To enable model development, we (1) collected, curated, and integrated the largest publicly available dataset for GPMT results; (2) succeeded in developing externally predictive (balanced accuracy of 70%-74% as evaluated by both 5-fold external cross-validation and testing of novel compounds) quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models for GPMT using machine learning algorithms, including deep learning; and (3) developed a publicly accessible web portal integrating PreS/MD models that can predict GPMT outcomes for any molecule of interest. We expect that PreS/MD will be used by both industry and regulatory scientists in medical device safety assessments and help replace, reduce, or refine the use of animals in toxicity testing. PreS/MD is freely available at https://presmd.mml.unc.edu/.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPMT; QSAR; deep learning; machine learning; new approach methods; sensitization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35916740      PMCID: PMC9516038          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.109


  41 in total

Review 1.  Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening.

Authors:  Alexander Tropsha; Alexander Golbraikh
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.116

2.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.

Authors:  K E Haneke; R R Tice; B L Carson; B H Margolin; W S Stokes
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 3.  International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing.

Authors:  Amber B Daniel; Judy Strickland; David Allen; Silvia Casati; Valérie Zuang; João Barroso; Maurice Whelan; M J Régimbald-Krnel; Hajime Kojima; Akiyoshi Nishikawa; Hye-Kyung Park; Jong Kwon Lee; Tae Sung Kim; Isabella Delgado; Ludmila Rios; Ying Yang; Gangli Wang; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Chemical toxicity prediction for major classes of industrial chemicals: Is it possible to develop universal models covering cosmetics, drugs, and pesticides?

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene N Muratov; Alexey Zakharov; Nail N Muratov; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in the Enlite glucose sensor and the Paradigm MiniMed Quick-set insulin infusion set.

Authors:  Anne Herman; Marie Baeck; Laurence de Montjoye; Magnus Bruze; Emil Giertz; An Goossens; Martin Mowitz
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  Skin Sensitization Testing-What's Next?

Authors:  Gunilla Grundström; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  STopTox: An in Silico Alternative to Animal Testing for Acute Systemic and Topical Toxicity.

Authors:  Joyce V B Borba; Vinicius M Alves; Rodolpho C Braga; Daniel R Korn; Kirsten Overdahl; Arthur C Silva; Steven U S Hall; Erik Overdahl; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Judy Strickland; David Allen; Carolina Horta Andrade; Eugene N Muratov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 11.035

8.  QSAR models of human data can enrich or replace LLNA testing for human skin sensitization.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Stephen J Capuzzi; Eugene Muratov; Rodolpho C Braga; Thomas Thornton; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Green Chem       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.182

9.  Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity.

Authors:  Dirk W Lachenmeier
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Similarity maps - a visualization strategy for molecular fingerprints and machine-learning methods.

Authors:  Sereina Riniker; Gregory A Landrum
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.