Literature DB >> 29518484

International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing.

Amber B Daniel1, Judy Strickland2, David Allen3, Silvia Casati4, Valérie Zuang5, João Barroso6, Maurice Whelan7, M J Régimbald-Krnel8, Hajime Kojima9, Akiyoshi Nishikawa10, Hye-Kyung Park11, Jong Kwon Lee12, Tae Sung Kim13, Isabella Delgado14, Ludmila Rios15, Ying Yang16, Gangli Wang17, Nicole Kleinstreuer18.   

Abstract

Skin sensitization test data are required or considered by chemical regulation authorities around the world. These data are used to develop product hazard labeling for the protection of consumers or workers and to assess risks from exposure to skin-sensitizing chemicals. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for skin sensitization tests, the needs and uses for skin sensitization test data must first be clarified. Thus, we reviewed skin sensitization testing requirements for seven countries or regions that are represented in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM). We noted the type of skin sensitization data required for each chemical sector and whether these data were used in a hazard classification, potency classification, or risk assessment context; the preferred tests; and whether alternative non-animal tests were acceptable. An understanding of national and regional regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing will inform the development of ICATM's international strategy for the acceptance and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with potential skin sensitizers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative approaches; Defined approaches; Non-animal methods; Regulatory requirements; Skin sensitization testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29518484      PMCID: PMC5935556          DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

1.  The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials' human repeated insult patch test protocol.

Authors:  Valerie T Politano; Anne Marie Api
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 2.  Safety assurance of cosmetics in Japan: current situation and future prospects.

Authors:  Shinji Inomata
Journal:  J Oleo Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 3.  State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies.

Authors:  Janine Ezendam; Hedwig M Braakhuis; Rob J Vandebriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods.

Authors:  S Casati; K Aschberger; J Barroso; W Casey; I Delgado; T S Kim; N Kleinstreuer; H Kojima; J K Lee; A Lowit; H K Park; M J Régimbald-Krnel; J Strickland; M Whelan; Y Yang; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Human-Derived In Vitro Models Used for Skin Toxicity Testing Under REACh.

Authors:  Susanne N Kolle; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021

2.  PreS/MD: Predictor of Sensitization Hazard for Chemical Substances Released From Medical Devices.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Joyce V B Borba; Rodolpho C Braga; Daniel R Korn; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kevin Causey; Alexander Tropsha; Diego Rua; Eugene N Muratov
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.109

3.  Application of Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization to Agrochemical Products.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; James Truax; Marco Corvaro; Raja Settivari; Joseph Henriquez; Jeremy McFadden; Travis Gulledge; Victor Johnson; Sean Gehen; Dori Germolec; David G Allen; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Development of a 96-Well Electrophilic Allergen Screening Assay for Skin Sensitization Using a Measurement Science Approach.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Richard Uhl; Blaza Toman; John T Elliott; Judy Strickland; James Truax; John Gordon
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 5.  Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 6.  Skin sensitization testing needs and data uses by US regulatory and research agencies.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Amber B Daniel; David Allen; Cecilia Aguila; Surender Ahir; Simona Bancos; Evisabel Craig; Dori Germolec; Chandramallika Ghosh; Naomi L Hudson; Abigail Jacobs; David M Lehmann; Joanna Matheson; Emily N Reinke; Nakissa Sadrieh; Stanislav Vukmanovic; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  The GARDpotency Assay for Potency-Associated Subclassification of Chemical Skin Sensitizers-Rationale, Method Development, and Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Andy Forreryd; Emil Aaltonen; Anders Jerre; Olivia Larne; Ulrika Mattson; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.

Authors:  Francesca Pistollato; Federica Madia; Raffaella Corvi; Sharon Munn; Elise Grignard; Alicia Paini; Andrew Worth; Anna Bal-Price; Pilar Prieto; Silvia Casati; Elisabet Berggren; Stephanie K Bopp; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Quantitative assessment of sensitizing potency using a dose-response adaptation of GARDskin.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Andy Forreryd; Ulrika Mattson; Anders Jerre; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Nano- and Micro-Porous Chitosan Membranes for Human Epidermal Stratification and Differentiation.

Authors:  Simona Salerno; Maria Penelope De Santo; Enrico Drioli; Loredana De Bartolo
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.