Literature DB >> 18220786

Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening.

Alexander Tropsha1, Alexander Golbraikh.   

Abstract

Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling has been traditionally applied as an evaluative approach, i.e., with the focus on developing retrospective and explanatory models of existing data. Model extrapolation was considered if only in hypothetical sense in terms of potential modifications of known biologically active chemicals that could improve compounds' activity. This critical review re-examines the strategy and the output of the modern QSAR modeling approaches. We provide examples and arguments suggesting that current methodologies may afford robust and validated models capable of accurate prediction of compound properties for molecules not included in the training sets. We discuss a data-analytical modeling workflow developed in our laboratory that incorporates modules for combinatorial QSAR model development (i.e., using all possible binary combinations of available descriptor sets and statistical data modeling techniques), rigorous model validation, and virtual screening of available chemical databases to identify novel biologically active compounds. Our approach places particular emphasis on model validation as well as the need to define model applicability domains in the chemistry space. We present examples of studies where the application of rigorously validated QSAR models to virtual screening identified computational hits that were confirmed by subsequent experimental investigations. The emerging focus of QSAR modeling on target property forecasting brings it forward as predictive, as opposed to evaluative, modeling approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18220786     DOI: 10.2174/138161207782794257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  96 in total

1.  QSAR classification of metabolic activation of chemicals into covalently reactive species.

Authors:  Chin Yee Liew; Chuen Pan; Andre Tan; Ke Xin Magneline Ang; Chun Wei Yap
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Fragment-guided approach to incorporating structural information into a CoMFA study: BACE-1 as an example.

Authors:  Lívia Barros Salum; Napoleão Fonseca Valadares
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase?

Authors:  Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Kevin Maik Jablonka; Daniele Ongari; Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Berend Smit
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Chemocentric informatics approach to drug discovery: identification and experimental validation of selective estrogen receptor modulators as ligands of 5-hydroxytryptamine-6 receptors and as potential cognition enhancers.

Authors:  Rima Hajjo; Vincent Setola; Bryan L Roth; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Differentiation of AmpC beta-lactamase binders vs. decoys using classification kNN QSAR modeling and application of the QSAR classifier to virtual screening.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Xiang S Wang; Denise Teotico; Alexander Golbraikh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Discovery of novel antimalarial compounds enabled by QSAR-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Denis Fourches; Alexander Sedykh; Hao Zhu; Alexander Golbraikh; Sean Ekins; Julie Clark; Michele C Connelly; Martina Sigal; Dena Hodges; Armand Guiguemde; R Kiplin Guy; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Julie C Barnes; Nicola C Day; Paul Bradley; Jane Z Reed; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 10.  Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Alexander Yeugenyevich Sedykh; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.