Literature DB >> 35916003

Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial.

Kwang Hyun Chung1, Jeong Don Chae2, Wonho Choe3, Hyo Young Lee1, Il Hwan Oh1, Byoung Kwan Son1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic channels are difficult to clean and can cause infection transmission. We examined the effectiveness of a newly developed channel-cleaning ball brush (BB), which is sucked into the endoscopic channel and scrapes and cleans the lumen as it passes through.
METHODS: The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopes used for patient examinations were randomly selected as the conventional brush (CB) or BB group. After manual cleaning, the presence or absence of carbohydrates, proteins, adenosine triphosphate, and hemoglobin was assessed.
RESULTS: Fifty-six and 58 endoscopes were cleaned with the CB and BB, respectively. Carbohydrate and protein were detected in one (1.8%) and two endoscopes (3.4%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=1.000). Hemoglobin was observed in one (1.8%) and three endoscopes (5.2%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.636). The adenosine triphosphate levels were 10.6±15.9 and 12.5±14.3 relative light units in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.496). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (32.8%) endoscopes were positive for microbial cultures in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.136).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of BB was not significantly different from that of CB in the endoscopic channel-cleaning process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ball brush; Disinfection; Environmental monitoring; Gastrointestinal endoscopes

Year:  2022        PMID: 35916003      PMCID: PMC9539290          DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endosc        ISSN: 2234-2400


  25 in total

1.  Endoscope disinfection and its pitfalls--requirement for retrograde surveillance cultures.

Authors:  A J Buss; M H Been; R P Borgers; I Stokroos; W J Melchers; F T Peters; A J Limburg; J E Degener
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning.

Authors:  N S Chu; D McAlister; P A Antonoplos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Surface-attached cells, biofilms and biocide susceptibility: implications for hospital cleaning and disinfection.

Authors:  J A Otter; K Vickery; J T Walker; E deLancey Pulcini; P Stoodley; S D Goldenberg; J A G Salkeld; J Chewins; S Yezli; J D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2016 update.

Authors:  Bret T Petersen; Jonathan Cohen; Ralph David Hambrick; Navtej Buttar; David A Greenwald; Jonathan M Buscaglia; James Collins; Glenn Eisen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Efficacy of low-temperature plasma-activated gas disinfection against biofilm on contaminated GI endoscope channels.

Authors:  Sudhir Bhatt; Poonam Mehta; Chen Chen; Christina L Schneider; Lauren N White; Hai-Lan Chen; Michael G Kong
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Technologies for monitoring the quality of endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Sri Komanduri; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Yasser M Bhat; Shailendra S Chauhan; Klaus T Gottlieb; Joo Ha Hwang; Vani Konda; Simon K Lo; Michael Manfredi; John T Maple; Faris M Murad; Uzma D Siddiqui; Michael B Wallace; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Lauren Epstein; Jennifer C Hunter; M Allison Arwady; Victoria Tsai; Linda Stein; Marguerite Gribogiannis; Mabel Frias; Alice Y Guh; Alison S Laufer; Stephanie Black; Massimo Pacilli; Heather Moulton-Meissner; J Kamile Rasheed; Johannetsy J Avillan; Brandon Kitchel; Brandi M Limbago; Duncan MacCannell; David Lonsway; Judith Noble-Wang; Judith Conway; Craig Conover; Michael Vernon; Alexander J Kallen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Simethicone is retained in endoscopes despite reprocessing: impact of its use on working channel fluid retention and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence values (with video).

Authors:  Monique T Barakat; Robert J Huang; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Comparison of adenosine triphosphate, microbiological load, and residual protein as indicators for assessing the cleanliness of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Authors:  Ryo Fushimi; Masaki Takashina; Hideki Yoshikawa; Hiroyoshi Kobayashi; Takashi Okubo; Seizoh Nakata; Mitsuo Kaku
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  Performance characteristics and optimal cut-off value of triple adenylate nucleotides test versus adenosine triphosphate test as point-of-care testing for predicting inadequacy of duodenoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  W Ridtitid; P Pakvisal; T Chatsuwan; S J Kerr; P Piyachaturawat; T Luangsukrerk; P Kongkam; R Rerknimitr
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.