Literature DB >> 22906873

Comparison of adenosine triphosphate, microbiological load, and residual protein as indicators for assessing the cleanliness of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Ryo Fushimi1, Masaki Takashina, Hideki Yoshikawa, Hiroyoshi Kobayashi, Takashi Okubo, Seizoh Nakata, Mitsuo Kaku.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated 3 potential indicators of gastrointestinal endoscope cleanliness: adenosine triphosphate (ATP), microbiological load, and protein.
METHODS: Before and after cleaning, ATP and microbiological load were determined from swabs of exterior surfaces and rinses of interior suction/accessory channels. Similarly, before and after cleaning, residual protein was determined from rinses of interior suction/accessory channels.
RESULTS: Before cleaning, ATP values were 10,417 relative light units (RLU) from the exterior endoscope surface and 30,281 RLU from the suction/accessory channel rinsates. After cleaning, these ATP values were decreased to 82 RLUs and 104 RLUs, a statistically significant difference. A similar trend was observed with microbiological load, but the change in residual protein from before cleaning to after cleaning was not significant. ATP values reliably reflected microbiological colony counts.
CONCLUSIONS: ATP measurement can provide a reliable, rapid and practical assessment of endoscope cleanliness for routine monitoring in the clinical setting.
Copyright © 2013 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906873     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  Multicenter comparative study of three "non-destructive" methods of detecting the cleanliness of the da Vinci surgical robotic instrument.

Authors:  Aiqin Chen; Xiumei Zou; Yanhua Tan; Yanhan Chen; Xinru Ye; Shuqin Hao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-12

3.  Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Chung; Jeong Don Chae; Wonho Choe; Hyo Young Lee; Il Hwan Oh; Byoung Kwan Son
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 4.  Recent Update on Microbiological Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Endoscopes after High-Level Disinfection.

Authors:  Suk Pyo Shin; Won Hee Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Surveillance of Endoscopes: Comparison of Different Sampling Techniques.

Authors:  Lien Cattoir; Thomas Vanzieleghem; Lisa Florin; Tania Helleputte; Martine De Vos; Bruno Verhasselt; Jerina Boelens; Isabel Leroux-Roels
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Evaluation of the total adenylate (ATP + ADP + AMP) test for cleaning verification in healthcare settings.

Authors:  M Bakke; S Suzuki; E Kirihara; S Mikami
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2019-06-28

7.  Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yirong Yang; Yuan Xiao; Li Zhang; Jiajia Lv; Qiyun Huang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.822

8.  No relation between adenosine triphosphate after manual cleaning and presence of microorganisms on endoscopes after automated high-level disinfection.

Authors:  Judith A Kwakman; Arjan W Rauwers; Jolanda G Buijs; Woutrinus de Groot; Margreet C Vos; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14

9.  Simulated-use validation of a sponge ATP method for determining the adequacy of manual cleaning of endoscope channels.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Nancy Olson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-05-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.