Literature DB >> 18264888

Endoscope disinfection and its pitfalls--requirement for retrograde surveillance cultures.

A J Buss1, M H Been, R P Borgers, I Stokroos, W J Melchers, F T Peters, A J Limburg, J E Degener.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Several endoscopy-related outbreaks of infection have been reported in recent years. For early recognition of inadequate disinfection of endoscopes we designed a microbiological surveillance system to evaluate the efficacy of the cleaning and disinfection procedure, and to trace disinfection problems to individual endoscopes or washer-disinfectors.
METHODS: Our surveillance protocol included anterograde and retrograde sampling, a decision algorithm, genetic fingerprinting, and scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Over a period of 29 months we found an increasing number of patient-ready endoscopes testing positive for Candida species other than albicans, especially C. parapsilosis. These yeasts were also isolated from the washer-disinfectors. The number of positive tests for Candida species varied from 1 out of 21 to 14 out of 27 samples from nine frequently used endoscopes. The number of colony-forming units per milliliter ranged from 1 - 10 to 3000 for endoscopes and 0.002 to 0.06 for the washer disinfectors. DNA fingerprinting was not able to discriminate different strains within C. parapsilosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol was able to detect a structural problem in the endoscope disinfection process. Retrograde sampling was crucial for this purpose, because it has much higher sensitivity than anterograde sampling. Endoscopes with damaged working channels are probably the source of the contamination problem with Candida species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264888     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  18 in total

1.  Assessment on experimental bacterial biofilms and in clinical practice of the efficacy of sampling solutions for microbiological testing of endoscopes.

Authors:  C Aumeran; E Thibert; F A Chapelle; C Hennequin; O Lesens; O Traoré
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of Two Culture Methods for Use in Assessing Microbial Contamination of Duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Michaela A Gazdik; Jana Coombs; John P Burke; Bert K Lopansri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Use of flexible endoscopes for NOTES: sterilization or high-level disinfection?

Authors:  Georg O Spaun; Trudie A Goers; Richard A Pierce; Maria A Cassera; Sandy Scovil; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 5.  Hygiene: The Looming Achilles Heel in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Jung; Ulrike Beilenhoff
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Chung; Jeong Don Chae; Wonho Choe; Hyo Young Lee; Il Hwan Oh; Byoung Kwan Son
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 7.  Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Julia Kovaleva; Frans T M Peters; Henny C van der Mei; John E Degener
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Antimicrobial Pressure of Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin on Biofilm Development by an Endoscope-Isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Idalina Machado; Joana Graça; Hélder Lopes; Susana Lopes; Maria O Pereira
Journal:  ISRN Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-28

Review 9.  Recent Update on Microbiological Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Endoscopes after High-Level Disinfection.

Authors:  Suk Pyo Shin; Won Hee Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Sequential Washing with Electrolyzed Alkaline and Acidic Water Effectively Removes Pathogens from Metal Surfaces.

Authors:  Yuichiro Nakano; Norihiko Akamatsu; Tsuyoshi Mori; Kazunori Sano; Katsuya Satoh; Takeshi Nagayasu; Yoshiaki Miyoshi; Tomomi Sugio; Hideyuki Sakai; Eiji Sakae; Kazuko Ichimiya; Masahisa Hamada; Takehisa Nakayama; Yuhzo Fujita; Katsunori Yanagihara; Noriyuki Nishida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.