Literature DB >> 9717778

Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning.

N S Chu1, D McAlister, P A Antonoplos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopes present a special bacterial decontamination challenge because the colon has a large and diverse microbial population.
METHODS: Bioburden of colonoscope insertion tube surfaces and suction channels were determined after use and after manual cleaning.
RESULTS: After use bioburden in suction channels averaged 7.0 x 10(9) colony-forming units (cfu). Cleaning reduced this level to 1.3 x 10(5). Cleaning of tube surfaces reduced the after-use bioburden from a level of 5.1 x 10(5) to 2.2 x 10(4) cfu. Gram-negative rods accounted for approximately 99% of the bioburden within the suction channel after use and after cleaning. After use flora were predominantly Escherichia coli and Bacteroides. The flora shifted to waterborne Pseudomonas organisms, and other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae after cleaning. Gram-positive bacteria were the primary isolates from the device surfaces both after use (56%) and after cleaning (47%). Because gram-positive cocci and diphtheroids are a part of the normal microbiota of the skin, these bacteria may have been introduced by the hospital environment or by handling.
CONCLUSIONS: After the cleaning of in-use colonoscopes, fewer than 10(6) vegetative bacteria could be recovered. This value is several logs lower than some previous estimates. This finding may be useful in the formulation of sterilization and disinfection cycles. Microflora from the colonoscopes indicated that the cleaning process introduced waterborne and enteric microorganisms, which highlights the importance of sanitation in the device reprocessing area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717778     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70154-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  Assessment on experimental bacterial biofilms and in clinical practice of the efficacy of sampling solutions for microbiological testing of endoscopes.

Authors:  C Aumeran; E Thibert; F A Chapelle; C Hennequin; O Lesens; O Traoré
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Rungsun Rerknimitr; Sorapat Eakthunyasakul; Pongpan Nunthapisud; Pradermchai Kongkam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 4.  Preventing nosocomial infections from gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  D Franchi; A Bahrani; J F Ober; M B Edmond
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-08

5.  Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Chung; Jeong Don Chae; Wonho Choe; Hyo Young Lee; Il Hwan Oh; Byoung Kwan Son
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 6.  Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Julia Kovaleva; Frans T M Peters; Henny C van der Mei; John E Degener
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Residual bioburden in reprocessed side-view endoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  D L N L Ubhayawardana; J Kottahachchi; M M Weerasekera; I W M P Wanigasooriya; S S N Fernando; M De Silva
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2013-12

8.  The impact of the use of different types of gloves and bare hands for preparation of clean surgical instruments.

Authors:  Camila Quartim de Moraes Bruna; Rafael Queiroz de Souza; Irineu Francisco Silva Massaia; Áurea Silveira Cruz; Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-10-10

Review 9.  AGA Rapid Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Shahnaz Sultan; Joseph K Lim; Osama Altayar; Perica Davitkov; Joseph D Feuerstein; Shazia M Siddique; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 22.682

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.