Literature DB >> 27020004

Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.

E Michael Lewiecki1, Neil Binkley2, Sarah L Morgan3, Christopher R Shuhart4, Bruno Muzzi Camargos5, John J Carey6, Catherine M Gordon7, Lawrence G Jankowski8, Joon-Kiong Lee9, William D Leslie10.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a technology that is widely used to diagnose osteoporosis, assess fracture risk, and monitor changes in bone mineral density (BMD). The clinical utility of DXA is highly dependent on the quality of the scan acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. Clinicians are best equipped to manage patients when BMD measurements are correct and interpretation follows well-established standards. Poor-quality acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of DXA data may mislead referring clinicians, resulting in unnecessary diagnostic evaluations, failure to evaluate when needed, inappropriate treatment, or failure to provide medical treatment, with potentially ineffective, harmful, or costly consequences. Misallocation of limited healthcare resources and poor treatment decisions can be minimized, and patient care optimized, through meticulous attention to DXA instrument calibration, data acquisition and analysis, interpretation, and reporting. This document from the International Society for Clinical Densitometry describes quality standards for BMD testing at DXA facilities worldwide to provide guidance for DXA supervisors, technologists, interpreters, and clinicians. High-quality DXA testing is necessary for correct diagnostic classification and optimal fracture risk assessment, and is essential for BMD monitoring.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accreditation; DXA; certification; osteoporosis; quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020004     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  44 in total

Review 1.  Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs.

Authors:  Willem F Lems; Hennie G Raterman
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Impact of Calcium and Two Doses of Vitamin D on Bone Metabolism in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maya Rahme; Sima Lynn Sharara; Rafic Baddoura; Robert H Habib; Georges Halaby; Asma Arabi; Ravinder J Singh; Moustapha Kassem; Ziyad Mahfoud; Maha Hoteit; Rose T Daher; Darina Bassil; Karim El Ferkh; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.

Authors:  Wenmin Guan; Wei Yu; Qiang Lin; Zaizhu Zhang; Guiying Du; Junping Tian; Ying Xu; Evelyn Hsieh
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Unscheduled Radiologic Examination Orders in the Electronic Health Record: A Novel Resource for Targeting Ambulatory Diagnostic Errors in Radiology.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Michael J Healey; Laila R Cochon; Romeo Laroya; Keith D Hentel; Adam B Landman; Sunil Eappen; Giles W Boland; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe.

Authors:  Elena Alacreu; David Moratal; Estanislao Arana
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine.

Authors:  M T Löffler; N Sollmann; K Mei; A Valentinitsch; P B Noël; J S Kirschke; T Baum
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Association of Bone Mineral Density With the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm.

Authors:  Yong-Won Shin; Kyung-Il Park; Jangsup Moon; Soon-Tae Lee; Kon Chu; Sang Kun Lee; Jae-Kyu Roh; Keun-Hwa Jung
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  Vertebral Bone Density Measurements by DXA are Influenced by Hepatic Iron Overload in Patients with Hemoglobinopathies.

Authors:  Haven M Allard; Lisa Calvelli; Marcela G Weyhmiller; Ginny Gildengorin; Ellen B Fung
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 9.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields: promising treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Wang; L Yang; J Jiang; Y Liu; Z Fan; C Zhong; C He
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Evaluation of bone texture imaging parameters on panoramic radiographs of patients with Sheehan's syndrome: a STROBE-compliant case-control study.

Authors:  D de Sá Cavalcante; M G da Silva Castro; A R P Quidute; M R A Martins; A M P L Cid; P G de Barros Silva; J Cadwell Williams; F S Neves; T R Ribeiro; F W G Costa
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.