Literature DB >> 28159711

Quality in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.

Sarah L Morgan1, Ginnie L Prater2.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), making the diagnosis of osteoporosis, and for monitoring changes in BMD over time. DXA data are also used in the determination of fracture risk. Procedural steps in DXA scanning can be broken down into scan acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and reporting. Careful attention to quality control pertaining to these procedural steps should theoretically be beneficial in patient management. Inattention to procedural steps and errors that may occur at each step has the possibility of providing information that would inform inappropriate clinical decisions, generating unnecessary healthcare expenses and ultimately causing avoidable harm to patients. This article reviews errors in DXA scanning that affect trueness and precision related to the machine, the patient, and the technologist and reviews articles which document problems with DXA quality in clinical and research settings. An understanding of DXA errors is critical for DXA quality; programs such as certification of DXA technologists and interpreters help in assuring quality bone densitometry. As DXA errors are common, pay for performance requiring DXA technologists and interpreters to be certified and follow quality indicators is indicated.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Errors; Quality; Scan acquisition; Scan analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28159711     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  21 in total

Review 1.  Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs.

Authors:  Willem F Lems; Hennie G Raterman
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Comparison of novel DXA system, Shimazu SONIALVISION G4, with GE-Lunar PRODIGY.

Authors:  Toki Takemoto; Takeshi Oguchi; Koji Oda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.

Authors:  Wenmin Guan; Wei Yu; Qiang Lin; Zaizhu Zhang; Guiying Du; Junping Tian; Ying Xu; Evelyn Hsieh
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Detrimental Association Between Blood Cadmium Concentration and Trabecular Bone Score.

Authors:  Jun-Wei Huang; Wen-Hui Fang; Wei-Liang Chen
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  The precision study of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density and body composition measurements in female cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Bin Guo; Qijun Cai; Jinci Mai; Lu Hou; Chunyuan Zeng; Jiefeng Gan; Zhiqiang Tan; Yuefeng Li; Yong Cheng; Jingjie Shang; Yongjin Tang; Xueying Ling; Jian Gong; Lu Wang; Hao Xu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

6.  The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Yoshito Otake; Makoto Iwasa; Hidetoshi Hamada; Wataru Ando; Yoshinobu Sato; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 7.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

8.  Pelvic floor disorder symptoms and bone strength in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Sarah L Morgan; Alayne D Markland; Jeff M Szychowski; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  ARTIFACTS AFFECTING DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS.

Authors:  Andrew J Spiro; Thanh D Hoang; Mohamed K M Shakir
Journal:  AACE Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-07

10.  Accounting for Surgical Confounding Factors Affecting Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in a Large Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Catherine M Donlon; Sharon H Chou; Cindy Y Yu; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.