Literature DB >> 9744987

Short-term reproducibility of proximal femur bone mineral density in the elderly.

D Maggio1, E V McCloskey, L Camilli, S Cenci, A Cherubini, J A Kanis, U Senin.   

Abstract

Densitometric measurements are prone to imprecision in elderly subjects and the present study was primarily designed to dissect out the effects of age and bone mineral density on proximal femur dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) reproducibility. The study comprised 17 elderly women (mean age 74.6 years, range 65-84 years), 13 early postmenopausal women with osteopenia (mean age 56.2 years, range 50-63 years), and 17 elderly men (mean age 73.8 years, range 65-86 years). Each subject was given triplicate proximal femur scans by a QDR 2000 Densitometer (Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA) with repositioning between scans. Because of subject selection in the early postmenopausal women there were no significant differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at any site among the three groups. Despite this, reproducibility errors expressed as either coefficient of variation (CV) % or mean standard deviation (SD) were greater in the elderly subjects, regardless of gender, when compared with the younger female subjects. The variability in measurement errors with age were least marked for the total hip and trochanteric sites. Within the elderly subjects, BMD appeared to exert little influence on measurement errors. We conclude that short-term proximal femur reproducibility is dependent on age-related factors other than BMD. There is no influence of gender on the measurement errors. It is likely that local factors (e.g., hip osteoarthritis) or general frailty may influence repositioning but this needs further exploration. In the meantime, the total hip and trochanteric sites should be used as they provide the most reproducible measurements in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744987     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  4 in total

1.  Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; A A Do Santos Zounon; I Jroundi; A Nouijai; M Ghazi; L Achemlal; A Bezza; M A Tazi; R Abouqual
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Yoshito Otake; Makoto Iwasa; Hidetoshi Hamada; Wataru Ando; Yoshinobu Sato; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.

Authors:  M C Lodder; W F Lems; H J Ader; A E Marthinsen; S C C M van Coeverden; P Lips; J C Netelenbos; B A C Dijkmans; J C Roos
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Discordant interpretation of serial bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using vendor's and institutional least significant changes: Serious impact on decision-making.

Authors:  Nosheen Fatima; Maseeh Uz Zaman; Sadaf Saleem; Noureen Hameed; Jamila Bano
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.