| Literature DB >> 35890397 |
Daniel Kwon1, Zhengxing Zhang1, Jutta Zeisler1, Hsiou-Ting Kuo1, Kuo-Shyan Lin1,2, Francois Benard1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is highly expressed in many subtypes of cancers, notably in several kidney-based malignancies. We synthesized, labeled, and assessed a series of radiotracers based on a previous high contrast PET imaging radiopharmaceutical [68Ga]Ga-BL02, with modifications to its linker and metal chelator, in order to improve its tumor-to-kidney contrast ratio.Entities:
Keywords: CXCR4; nuclear medicine; oncology; pharmacokinetics; positron emission tomography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890397 PMCID: PMC9316317 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.525
Figure 1Representative chemical structures of the gallium-labeled BL02 (Glu); BL06 (Pip); BL17 (Aad); BL20 (D-Glu); BL25 (Asp); BL30 (DOTAGA); and BL31 (CysAcid).
In vitro data of each 68Ga-labeled radiotracer. Peptide net charge was calculated at pH 7.40. All values are in triplicate, unless indicated otherwise.
| Radiotracer | IC50 (nM) | Peptide Net Charge | LogD7.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| [68Ga]BL02 | 27.9 ± 12.5 † | 3.0 | −4.20 ± 0.44 |
| [68Ga]BL06 | 26.3 ± 27.6 † | 4.0 | N.D. |
| [68Ga]BL17 | 13.0 ± 8.6 † | 3.0 | N.D. |
| [68Ga]BL20 | N.D. | 3.0 | N.D. |
| [68Ga]BL25 | 21.3 ± 0.1 | 3.0 | N.D. |
| [68Ga]BL30 | 22.7 ± 1.2 | 2.0 | N.D. |
| [68Ga]BL31 | 16.2 ± 4.2 | 3.0 | −4.17 ± 0.14 |
†n = 4, N.D.: not determined.
Figure 2(A) Maximum intensity projections for PET/CT and PET alone at 1 and 2 h p.i. of [68Ga]Ga-BL06 and [68Ga]Ga-BL02. Scales of the PET images of [68Ga]Ga-BL02 and [68Ga]Ga-BL06 are 0–6 %ID/g. (B) Ex vivo biodistribution data of [68Ga]Ga-BL06 in comparison to that of [68Ga]Ga-BL02 in Daudi xenograft-bearing mice at 1 and 2 h p.i. (p < 0.01 = **, p < 0.001 = ***, p < 0.0001 = ****, ns = not significant).
Figure 3(A) Maximum intensity projections for PET/CT and PET alone at 1 h p.i. [68Ga]Ga-BL17. Scales of the PET images of [68Ga]Ga-BL17 are 0–6 %ID/g. (B) Ex vivo biodistribution data of [68Ga]Ga-BL17; [68Ga]Ga-BL20; and [68Ga]Ga-BL25 in comparison to that of [68Ga]Ga-BL02 in Daudi xenograft-bearing mice at 1 and 2 h p.i. [68Ga]Ga-BL25 was only evaluated at 2 h p.i.
Figure 4(A) Maximum intensity projections for PET/CT and PET alone at 1 and 2 h p.i. of [68Ga]Ga-BL31. Scales of the PET images of [68Ga]Ga-BL31 are 0–6 %ID/g. (B) Ex vivo biodistribution data of [68Ga]Ga-BL31 in comparison to that of [68Ga]Ga-BL02 in Daudi xenograft-bearing mice at 1 and 2 h p.i. (p < 0.05 = *, p < 0.01 = **, p < 0.001 = ***, p < 0.0001 = ****, ns = not significant).
Figure 5(A) Maximum intensity projections for PET/CT and PET alone at 1 and 2 h p.i. of [68Ga]Ga-BL31 and [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor. Scales of the PET images of [68Ga]Ga-BL31 and [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor are 0–6 %ID/g. (B) Ex vivo biodistribution data of [68Ga]Ga-BL31 in comparison to that of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor in Daudi xenograft-bearing mice at 1 and 2 h p.i. (p < 0.05 = *, p < 0.01 = **, p < 0.001 = ***, p < 0.0001 = ****, ns = not significant).