Jens Kurth1, Bernd Joachim Krause2, Sarah M Schwarzenböck2, Carina Bergner2, Oliver W Hakenberg3, Martin Heuschkel2. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany. jens.kurth@med.uni-rostock.de. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany. 3. Department of Urology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Besides PSMA, prostate cancer cells also express gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) which is therefore a promising target for theranostic approaches. The high affinity GRPr antagonist RM2 can be labeled with beta-emitting radiometals for therapeutic purposes. The aim of this study was to calculate absorbed doses for critical organs and tumor lesions for [177Lu]Lu-RM2 therapy administered in a group of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who had insufficient PSMA expression or showed lower PSMA accumulation after previous cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. METHODS: Thirty-five patients suffering from mCRPC without further treatment options for approved therapies were examined with [68Ga]Ga-RM2-PET/CT. Out of these, 4 patients (mean age 68 years) were treated with [177Lu]Lu-RM2; two of these also received a 2nd therapy cycle. Mean activity was 4.5 ± 0.9 GBq. For dosimetry, patients underwent planar WB-scintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging of the upper and lower abdomen at approximately 1, 24, 48, and 72 h p.i. along with blood sampling. Absorbed doses for kidneys, pancreas, liver, spleen, gallbladder wall, and tumor lesions were derived based on quantitative SPECT/CT according to RADAR dosimetry scheme; individual organ masses were extracted from CT. Absorbed dose to bone marrow was calculated based on serial whole-body images and blood sampling according to the EANM guideline. RESULTS: Therapy was well tolerated by all patients and no side effects were observed. An increased uptake in tumor lesions and the pancreas was seen within the first 1 h. Mean absorbed organ doses were 1.08 ± 0.44 Gy/GBq in the pancreas, 0.35 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq in the kidneys, 0.05 ± 0.02 Gy/GBq in the liver, 0.07 ± 0.02 Gy/GBq in the gallbladder wall, 0.10 ± 0.06 Gy/GBq in the spleen, and 0.02 ± 0.01 Gy/GBq for the red bone marrow. The mean dose for tumor lesions was 6.20 ± 3.00 Gy/GBq. CONCLUSIONS: Application of GRPr antagonist [177Lu]Lu-RM2 is suitable for targeted radiotherapy of mCRPC as it shows high tumor uptake and rapid clearance from normal organs. Absorbed doses in tumor lesions are therapeutically relevant. The critical organ receiving the highest absorbed dose was the pancreas. Results suggest that the activity administered for each cycle could be increased to maximize the absorbed dose of tumors and metastases.
PURPOSE: Besides PSMA, prostate cancer cells also express gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) which is therefore a promising target for theranostic approaches. The high affinity GRPr antagonist RM2 can be labeled with beta-emitting radiometals for therapeutic purposes. The aim of this study was to calculate absorbed doses for critical organs and tumor lesions for [177Lu]Lu-RM2 therapy administered in a group of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who had insufficientPSMA expression or showed lower PSMA accumulation after previous cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. METHODS: Thirty-five patients suffering from mCRPC without further treatment options for approved therapies were examined with [68Ga]Ga-RM2-PET/CT. Out of these, 4 patients (mean age 68 years) were treated with [177Lu]Lu-RM2; two of these also received a 2nd therapy cycle. Mean activity was 4.5 ± 0.9 GBq. For dosimetry, patients underwent planar WB-scintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging of the upper and lower abdomen at approximately 1, 24, 48, and 72 h p.i. along with blood sampling. Absorbed doses for kidneys, pancreas, liver, spleen, gallbladder wall, and tumor lesions were derived based on quantitative SPECT/CT according to RADAR dosimetry scheme; individual organ masses were extracted from CT. Absorbed dose to bone marrow was calculated based on serial whole-body images and blood sampling according to the EANM guideline. RESULTS: Therapy was well tolerated by all patients and no side effects were observed. An increased uptake in tumor lesions and the pancreas was seen within the first 1 h. Mean absorbed organ doses were 1.08 ± 0.44 Gy/GBq in the pancreas, 0.35 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq in the kidneys, 0.05 ± 0.02 Gy/GBq in the liver, 0.07 ± 0.02 Gy/GBq in the gallbladder wall, 0.10 ± 0.06 Gy/GBq in the spleen, and 0.02 ± 0.01 Gy/GBq for the red bone marrow. The mean dose for tumor lesions was 6.20 ± 3.00 Gy/GBq. CONCLUSIONS: Application of GRPr antagonist [177Lu]Lu-RM2 is suitable for targeted radiotherapy of mCRPC as it shows high tumor uptake and rapid clearance from normal organs. Absorbed doses in tumor lesions are therapeutically relevant. The critical organ receiving the highest absorbed dose was the pancreas. Results suggest that the activity administered for each cycle could be increased to maximize the absorbed dose of tumors and metastases.
Authors: J A Siegel; S R Thomas; J B Stubbs; M G Stabin; M T Hays; K F Koral; J S Robertson; R W Howell; B W Wessels; D R Fisher; D A Weber; A B Brill Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Søren M Bentzen; Louis S Constine; Joseph O Deasy; Avi Eisbruch; Andrew Jackson; Lawrence B Marks; Randall K Ten Haken; Ellen D Yorke Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Simone U Dalm; Ingrid L Bakker; Erik de Blois; Gabriela N Doeswijk; Mark W Konijnenberg; Francesca Orlandi; Donato Barbato; Mattia Tedesco; Theodosia Maina; Berthold A Nock; Marion de Jong Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Philip Cornford; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Maria De Santis; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Thomas Wiegel; Nicolas Mottet Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Dik J Kwekkeboom; Wouter W de Herder; Boen L Kam; Casper H van Eijck; Martijn van Essen; Peter P Kooij; Richard A Feelders; Maarten O van Aken; Eric P Krenning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anna Sundlöv; Katarina Sjögreen-Gleisner; Johanna Svensson; Michael Ljungberg; Tomas Olsson; Peter Bernhardt; Jan Tennvall Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Truc T Huynh; Ellen M van Dam; Sreeja Sreekumar; Cedric Mpoy; Benjamin J Blyth; Fenella Muntz; Matthew J Harris; Buck E Rogers Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-06-08
Authors: Kerstin Michalski; Lars Kemna; Jasmin Asberger; Anca L Grosu; Philipp T Meyer; Juri Ruf; Tanja Sprave Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Terry W Moody; Lingaku Lee; Irene Ramos-Alvarez; Tatiana Iordanskaia; Samuel A Mantey; Robert T Jensen Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 5.555