Literature DB >> 23451981

Quantitative structure-activity relationship models of clinical pharmacokinetics: clearance and volume of distribution.

Vijay K Gombar1, Stephen D Hall.   

Abstract

Reliable prediction of two fundamental human pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, systemic clearance (CL) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd), determine the size and frequency of drug dosing and are at the heart of drug discovery and development. Traditionally, estimated CL and Vd are derived from preclinical in vitro and in vivo absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) measurements. In this paper, we report quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for prediction of systemic CL and steady-state Vd (Vdss) from intravenous (iv) dosing in humans. These QSAR models avoid uncertainty associated with preclinical-to-clinical extrapolation and require two-dimensional structure drawing as the sole input. The clean, uniform training sets for these models were derived from the compilation published by Obach et al. (Drug Metab. Disp. 2008, 36, 1385-1405). Models for CL and Vdss were developed using both a support vector regression (SVR) method and a multiple linear regression (MLR) method. The SVR models employ a minimum of 2048-bit fingerprints developed in-house as structure quantifiers. The MLR models, on the other hand, are based on information-rich electro-topological states of two-atom fragments as descriptors and afford reverse QSAR (RQSAR) analysis to help model-guided, in silico modulation of structures for desired CL and Vdss. The capability of the models to predict iv CL and Vdss with acceptable accuracy was established by randomly splitting data into training and test sets. On average, for both CL and Vdss, 75% of test compounds were predicted within 2.5-fold of the value observed and 90% of test compounds were within 5.0-fold of the value observed. The performance of the final models developed from 525 compounds for CL and 569 compounds for Vdss was evaluated on an external set of 56 compounds. The predictions were either better or comparable to those predicted by other in silico models reported in the literature. To demonstrate the practical application of the RQSAR approach, the structure of vildagliptin, a high-CL and a high-Vdss compound, is modified based on the atomic contributions to its predicted CL and Vdss to propose compounds with lower CL and lower Vdss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23451981     DOI: 10.1021/ci400001u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  9 in total

Review 1.  Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Alexander Yeugenyevich Sedykh; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Comparative study on pharmacokinetics of a series of anticholinergics, atropine, anisodamine, anisodine, scopolamine and tiotropium in rats.

Authors:  Fengjie Tian; Cuiyun Li; Xin Wang; Shuangxia Ren; Ning Li; Qi Liu; Sufeng Zhou; Yang Lu; Di Zhao; Xijing Chen
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 3.  Long-acting drugs and formulations for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection.

Authors:  Charles Flexner; Andrew Owen; Marco Siccardi; Susan Swindells
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Applying linear and non-linear methods for parallel prediction of volume of distribution and fraction of unbound drug.

Authors:  Eva M del Amo; Leo Ghemtio; Henri Xhaard; Marjo Yliperttula; Arto Urtti; Heidi Kidron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Systematic artifacts in support vector regression-based compound potency prediction revealed by statistical and activity landscape analysis.

Authors:  Jenny Balfer; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Developing a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Knowledgebase in Support of Provisional Model Construction.

Authors:  Jingtao Lu; Michael-Rock Goldsmith; Christopher M Grulke; Daniel T Chang; Raina D Brooks; Jeremy A Leonard; Martin B Phillips; Ethan D Hypes; Matthew J Fair; Rogelio Tornero-Velez; Jeffre Johnson; Curtis C Dary; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Reducing the Kidney Uptake of High Contrast CXCR4 PET Imaging Agents via Linker Modifications.

Authors:  Daniel Kwon; Zhengxing Zhang; Jutta Zeisler; Hsiou-Ting Kuo; Kuo-Shyan Lin; Francois Benard
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.525

8.  Predicting Total Drug Clearance and Volumes of Distribution Using the Machine Learning-Mediated Multimodal Method through the Imputation of Various Nonclinical Data.

Authors:  Hiroaki Iwata; Tatsuru Matsuo; Hideaki Mamada; Takahisa Motomura; Mayumi Matsushita; Takeshi Fujiwara; Kazuya Maeda; Koichi Handa
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.162

9.  Looking back to the future: predicting in vivo efficacy of small molecules versus Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Richard Pottorf; Robert C Reynolds; Antony J Williams; Alex M Clark; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.956

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.