UNLABELLED: Uptake of radiolabeled peptides in the kidneys may obscure abdominal tumors in radiopeptide scintigraphy. This problem is much more pronounced in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (i.e., radiopeptide therapy), possibly leading to renal damage or even failure. Cationic peptide uptake in the kidneys can be reduced by the application of cationic amino acids, such as lysine or arginine. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable method to reduce anionic peptide uptake in the kidneys. (111)In-Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid dGlu(1)-minigastrin ((111)In-DTPA-dGlu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH(2)) was chosen as a model compound with a sequence of 6 negatively charged glutamic acids in a chain and an additional aspartic acid. METHODS: TT (human medullary carcinoma cells)-bearing nu/nu mice of the Institute of Cancer Research genotype received intraperitoneal injections of different chain lengths and weights of glutamic acids, aspartic acids, and derivatives of glutamic acids. Uptake in tumors and organs was determined and compared with the values for untreated control mice. RESULTS: Accretion of (111)In-DTPA-dGlu(1)-minigastrin in the kidneys could be reduced by up to 90%. The uptake values for all other organs and the tumors were not affected. These results were obtained with a chain of 5 or more glutamic acids, whereas uptake in kidneys was affected not at all or only slightly with poly-d-glutamic or polyaspartic acids and with Glu(x) (x = 1-4). CONCLUSION: These studies indicated a specific blocking of uptake by Glu(5) sequences in the kidneys. Application of polyglutamic acids is a new, successful method of reducing uptake of negatively charged peptides in the kidneys during radiopeptide therapy.
UNLABELLED: Uptake of radiolabeled peptides in the kidneys may obscure abdominal tumors in radiopeptide scintigraphy. This problem is much more pronounced in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (i.e., radiopeptide therapy), possibly leading to renal damage or even failure. Cationic peptide uptake in the kidneys can be reduced by the application of cationic amino acids, such as lysine or arginine. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable method to reduce anionic peptide uptake in the kidneys. (111)In-Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic aciddGlu(1)-minigastrin ((111)In-DTPA-dGlu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH(2)) was chosen as a model compound with a sequence of 6 negatively charged glutamic acids in a chain and an additional aspartic acid. METHODS: TT (human medullary carcinoma cells)-bearing nu/nu mice of the Institute of Cancer Research genotype received intraperitoneal injections of different chain lengths and weights of glutamic acids, aspartic acids, and derivatives of glutamic acids. Uptake in tumors and organs was determined and compared with the values for untreated control mice. RESULTS: Accretion of (111)In-DTPA-dGlu(1)-minigastrin in the kidneys could be reduced by up to 90%. The uptake values for all other organs and the tumors were not affected. These results were obtained with a chain of 5 or more glutamic acids, whereas uptake in kidneys was affected not at all or only slightly with poly-d-glutamic or polyaspartic acids and with Glu(x) (x = 1-4). CONCLUSION: These studies indicated a specific blocking of uptake by Glu(5) sequences in the kidneys. Application of polyglutamic acids is a new, successful method of reducing uptake of negatively charged peptides in the kidneys during radiopeptide therapy.
Authors: Torun Ekblad; Thuy Tran; Anna Orlova; Charles Widström; Joachim Feldwisch; Lars Abrahmsén; Anders Wennborg; Amelie Eriksson Karlström; Vladimir Tolmachev Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-07-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Christine Rangger; Jane Sosabowski; Peter Laverman; Jean-Claude Reubi; Irene Johanna Virgolini; Clemens Decristoforo Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Martin Gotthardt; Martin P Béhé; Daniela Beuter; Anke Battmann; Artur Bauhofer; Tino Schurrat; Meike Schipper; Halina Pollum; Wim J G Oyen; Thomas M Behr Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Miroslav Malesević; Jan Kühling; Frank Erdmann; Molly A Balsley; Michael I Bukrinsky; Stephanie L Constant; Gunter Fischer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Marek Pruszynski; Eftychia Koumarianou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Hilde Revets; Nick Devoogdt; Tony Lahoutte; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Alida C Fröberg; Marion de Jong; Berthold A Nock; Wout A P Breeman; Jack L Erion; Theodosia Maina; Marion Verdijsseldonck; Wouter W de Herder; Aad van der Lugt; Peter P M Kooij; Eric P Krenning Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Erik Vegt; Annemarie Eek; Wim J G Oyen; Marion de Jong; Martin Gotthardt; Otto C Boerman Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236