| Literature DB >> 35887547 |
Nicholas Major1, Neal A Patel1, Josiah Bennett1, Ena Novakovic1, Dana Poloni2, Mickey Abraham3, Nolan J Brown4, Julian L Gendreau5, Ronald Sahyouni3, Joshua Loya3.
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system are the most common solid malignancies diagnosed in children. While common, they are also found to have some of the lowest survival rates of all malignancies. Treatment of childhood brain tumors often consists of operative gross total resection with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The current body of literature is largely inconclusive regarding the overall benefit of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. However, it is known that both are associated with conditions that lower the quality of life in children who undergo those treatments. Chemotherapy is often associated with nausea, emesis, significant fatigue, immunosuppression, and alopecia. While radiotherapy can be effective for achieving local control, it is associated with late effects such as endocrine dysfunction, secondary malignancy, and neurocognitive decline. Advancements in radiotherapy grant both an increase in lifetime survival and an increased lifetime for survivors to contend with these late effects. In this review, the authors examined all the published literature, analyzing the results of clinical trials, case series, and technical notes on patients undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of tumors of the central nervous system with a focus on neurocognitive decline and survival outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: clinical outcomes; glioblastoma; glioma; medulloblastoma; neurocognitive decline; pediatric; pilocytic astrocytoma; quality of life; radiotherapy; survival; tumors
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887547 PMCID: PMC9315742 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Description of pediatric-tumor treatments including proposed management and dosages.
| Tumor Type | Mainstay Treatment | Specific Radiation Therapy | Reported Survival |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medulloblastoma | Maximal surgical resection with | Proton-beam-radiation therapy (23.4 Gy in 13 fractions of | 86% at 5 years [ |
| Low-Grade Glioma | Maximal surgical resection. | Proton-beam radiation | >90% at 10 years [ |
| High-Grade Glioma | Maximal surgical resection. | Proton-beam-radiation strength, dependent on radiosensitivity of | 26.5% at 2 years [ |
| Brain Stem Glioma | Resection when possible and | Proton-beam radiation | Widely variable: 34% at 5 years [ |
| Ependymoma | Maximal surgical resection. Local or craniospinal radiation in those with subtotal resection [ | Proton-beam radiation | 76% at 10 years [ |
| Craniopharyngioma | Controversial surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy [ | Proton-beam radiation | 88% at 5 years [ |
Summary of the late effects due to radiotherapy on neurocognition.
| Key Points of Discussion on the Neurocognitive Late Effects from Radiotherapy |
|---|
|
Decline in IQ and academic achievement [ Decline in processing speed and memory [ Early-Onset dementia [ Destruction of white brain matter, oligodendrocytes, and other neurons [ |
Comparison of complications (favorable or unfavorable) in the different radiotherapy modalities.
| Type of Radiotherapy | Proton-Beam Radiotherapy | IMRT (Photon) | VMAT (Photon) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison of |
Reduction in dose to vital organs [ Favorable sparing of normal brain tissue in pediatric ependymoma [ Reduced incidence of secondary cancer in medulloblastoma [ No significant decline in IQ [ No significant impairment in neurocognitive function in [ Reduction in risk of secondary cancer [ |
Reduction in neurotoxicity [ Unfavorable sparing of normal brain tissue in pediatric ependymoma [ No significant neurocognitive impairment in survivors [ Increased need for endocrine replacement [ Significant neurocognitive impairment [ 18% lifetime risk of secondary cancer [ |
Reduction in neurotoxicity [ Significant neurocognitive impairment [ Increased need for endocrine replacement [ |
Both IMRT and VMAT are subtypes of photon-based radiotherapy. IMRT = intensity modulated radiotherapy. VMAT = volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Figure 1Graphical depiction of proton-beam dosage per tissue depth. The figure demonstrates that the dosage of the proton beam is higher in deeper tissues. The more superficial tissues are spared from increased dosages (blue line). In contrast, photon-beam radiation (green line) has increased dosage in superficial tissue with decreased dosage in deeper tissues.