Literature DB >> 8276653

Treatment of intracranial ependymomas of children: review of a 15-year experience.

P Rousseau1, J L Habrand, D Sarrazin, C Kalifa, M J Terrier-Lacombe, C Rekacewicz, A Rey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are still major controversies in the optimal management of children with intracranial ependymomas. To assess the impact of tumor site, histology, and treatment, the outcome of children treated at the Institut Gustave Roussy was reviewed retrospectively. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1975 and 1989, 80 children aged 4 months to 15.8 years were seen at the Institut Gustave Roussy for postoperative management of an intracranial ependymoma. Location of tumor was infratentorial in 63 cases and supratentorial in 17. Surgical treatment consisted of complete resection in 38, incomplete resection in 38 and biopsy only in 4. Postoperative irradiation was done in 65 patients and chemotherapy in 33. Surviving patients have been followed from 12-197 months with a median of 54 months.
RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial survival and event-free survival are 56% and 38%, respectively. Thirty-four patients relapsed from 3-72 months after diagnosis (median 25 months). In 20 patients, the only site of failure was the original tumor site. Three patients failed locally and at distance, while 10 others failed only at distance. Survival at 5 years was significantly better for patients who had complete resection of the tumor (75% vs. 41%, p = 0.001) and for those who received radiation therapy (63% vs. 23%, p = 0.003). Event-free survival at 5 years was superior in patients with complete resection of the tumor (51% vs. 26%, p = 0.002) and in patients who received radiation therapy (45% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Sex and tumor site had no impact on survival or event-free survival. There was no difference in survival, event-free survival, or pattern of failure between patients treated with local field, whole brain or craniospinal irradiation, while severe longterm sequelae were noted predominantly in the latter two groups.
CONCLUSION: Considering that failures were predominantly local and that there was no apparent benefit from prophylactic irradiation, we recommend local field irradiation with doses above 50.0 Gy for all children with intracranial ependymomas, without meningeal dissemination at diagnosis. Special considerations are necessary for children < 3 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8276653     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90061-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  54 in total

1.  Genomic imbalances in pediatric intracranial ependymomas define clinically relevant groups.

Authors:  Sara Dyer; Emma Prebble; Val Davison; Paul Davies; Pramila Ramani; David Ellison; Richard Grundy
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Predictors of survival among older adults with ependymoma.

Authors:  E Susan Amirian; Terri S Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy for infratentorial ependymoma in children: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Thomas Zilli; Hans Peter Do; Philippe Nouet; Fabienne Gumy Pause; Fabienne Gumy Pause; Alessia Pica
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  The role of stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of ependymomas.

Authors:  Mark D Krieger; J Gordon McComb
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Do we really need class 1 evidence results to give adjuvant radiation therapy to childhood intracranial ependymomas?

Authors:  Maura Massimino; Lorenza Gandola; Maria Luisa Garrè; Armando Cama; Piergiorgio Modena; Paolo Potepan; Felice Giangaspero
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Supratentorial pediatric cortical ependymomas: a comprehensive retrospective study.

Authors:  Qiguang Wang; Jian Cheng; Si Zhang; Qiang Li; Xuhui Hui; Yan Ju
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Prognostic relevance of localization and grading in intracranial ependymomas of childhood.

Authors:  R I Ernestus; R Schröder; H Stützer; N Klug
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  Neuropsychological sequelae and quality of life following treatment of posterior fossa ependymomas in children.

Authors:  Constantinos Charalambides; Argyris Dinopoulos; Spyros Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Multivariate analysis of clinical prognostic factors in children with intracranial ependymomas.

Authors:  Tang-Her Jaing; Huei-Shyong Wang; Pei-Kwei Tsay; Chen-Kan Tseng; Shih-Ming Jung; Kuang-Lin Lin; Tai-Ngar Lui
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Predictors of survival among pediatric and adult ependymoma cases: a study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1973 to 2007.

Authors:  E Susan Amirian; Terri S Armstrong; Kenneth D Aldape; Mark R Gilbert; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.