PURPOSE: This study investigates the response rate to and toxicity of carboplatin and vincristine in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas (LGGs) or patients younger than 60 months with newly diagnosed LGGs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children with recurrent and 37 children with newly diagnosed LGGs were treated with a 10-week induction cycle of carboplatin and vincristine, followed by maintenance treatment with the same drugs. Patients were evaluated for response to treatment and toxicity. RESULTS: Twelve of 23 (52% +/- 10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.72) assessable children with recurrent disease had an objective response to treatment, which included a greater than 50% reduction in tumor size in seven of 23 (30% +/- 10%; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.50). Twenty-three of 37 (62% +/- .08; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.78) of newly diagnosed patients had an objective response, 16 of 37 (43% +/- 0.08%; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.59) with greater than 50% reduction in tumor size. The majority of those with an objective response had diencephalic tumors (n = 29), but children with thalamic (n = 2), cortical (n = 1), and brain stem (n = 2) LGGs also responded to treatment. Of the 35 patients with objective response to treatment, the maximum response was seen in 25 after completion of induction and in the remaining 10 after two to six cycles of maintenance treatment. Forty-nine of 53 (92% +/- .04%) patients who were stable or improved after induction remain without progressive disease (PD). Hematologic toxicity was common, but resulted in cessation of therapy in only one patient. Six children have been removed from the study because of allergic reactions, which were considered to be carboplatin-associated. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin and vincristine have activity in children with recurrent and newly diagnosed progressive LGGs. Objective responses to treatment after chemotherapy can be seen. This drug regimen is relatively well tolerated, and further studies are indicated to define the role of this combination of drugs in children with newly diagnosed LGGs.
PURPOSE: This study investigates the response rate to and toxicity of carboplatin and vincristine in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas (LGGs) or patients younger than 60 months with newly diagnosed LGGs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children with recurrent and 37 children with newly diagnosed LGGs were treated with a 10-week induction cycle of carboplatin and vincristine, followed by maintenance treatment with the same drugs. Patients were evaluated for response to treatment and toxicity. RESULTS: Twelve of 23 (52% +/- 10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.72) assessable children with recurrent disease had an objective response to treatment, which included a greater than 50% reduction in tumor size in seven of 23 (30% +/- 10%; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.50). Twenty-three of 37 (62% +/- .08; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.78) of newly diagnosed patients had an objective response, 16 of 37 (43% +/- 0.08%; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.59) with greater than 50% reduction in tumor size. The majority of those with an objective response had diencephalic tumors (n = 29), but children with thalamic (n = 2), cortical (n = 1), and brain stem (n = 2) LGGs also responded to treatment. Of the 35 patients with objective response to treatment, the maximum response was seen in 25 after completion of induction and in the remaining 10 after two to six cycles of maintenance treatment. Forty-nine of 53 (92% +/- .04%) patients who were stable or improved after induction remain without progressive disease (PD). Hematologic toxicity was common, but resulted in cessation of therapy in only one patient. Six children have been removed from the study because of allergic reactions, which were considered to be carboplatin-associated. CONCLUSION:Carboplatin and vincristine have activity in children with recurrent and newly diagnosed progressive LGGs. Objective responses to treatment after chemotherapy can be seen. This drug regimen is relatively well tolerated, and further studies are indicated to define the role of this combination of drugs in children with newly diagnosed LGGs.
Authors: Joann L Ater; Tianni Zhou; Emiko Holmes; Claire M Mazewski; Timothy N Booth; David R Freyer; Ken H Lazarus; Roger J Packer; Michael Prados; Richard Sposto; Gilbert Vezina; Jeffrey H Wisoff; Ian F Pollack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea Maria Cappellano; Antonio Sergio Petrilli; Nasjla Saba da Silva; Frederico Adolfo Silva; Priscila Mendes Paiva; Sergio Cavalheiro; Eric Bouffet Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Alvaro Lassaletta; Michal Zapotocky; Matthew Mistry; Vijay Ramaswamy; Marion Honnorat; Rahul Krishnatry; Ana Guerreiro Stucklin; Nataliya Zhukova; Anthony Arnoldo; Scott Ryall; Catriona Ling; Tara McKeown; Jim Loukides; Ofelia Cruz; Carmen de Torres; Cheng-Ying Ho; Roger J Packer; Ruth Tatevossian; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Julie H Harreld; James D Dalton; Jean Mulcahy-Levy; Nicholas Foreman; Matthias A Karajannis; Shiyang Wang; Matija Snuderl; Amulya Nageswara Rao; Caterina Giannini; Mark Kieran; Keith L Ligon; Maria Luisa Garre; Paolo Nozza; Samantha Mascelli; Alessandro Raso; Sabine Mueller; Theodore Nicolaides; Karen Silva; Romain Perbet; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Cécile Faure Conter; Didier Frappaz; Sarah Leary; Courtney Crane; Aden Chan; Ho-Keung Ng; Zhi-Feng Shi; Ying Mao; Elizabeth Finch; David Eisenstat; Bev Wilson; Anne Sophie Carret; Peter Hauser; David Sumerauer; Lenka Krskova; Valerie Larouche; Adam Fleming; Shayna Zelcer; Nada Jabado; James T Rutka; Peter Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Shiyi Chen; Ute Bartels; Annie Huang; David W Ellison; Eric Bouffet; Cynthia Hawkins; Uri Tabori Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Guillaume Bergthold; Pratiti Bandopadhayay; Wenya Linda Bi; Lori Ramkissoon; Charles Stiles; Rosalind A Segal; Rameen Beroukhim; Keith L Ligon; Jacques Grill; Mark W Kieran Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2014-02-28