Literature DB >> 17497313

A review of the impact of photon and proton external beam radiotherapy treatment modalities on the dose distribution in field and out-of-field; implications for the long-term morbidity of cancer survivors.

Asa Palm1, Karl-Axel Johansson.   

Abstract

The use of untraditional treatment modalities for external beam radiotherapy such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy is increasing. This review focuses on the changes in the dose distribution and the impact on radiation related risks for long-term cancer survivors. We compare conventional radiotherapy, IMRT, and proton beam therapy based on published treatment planning studies as well as published measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of out-of-field dose distributions. Physical dose parameters describing the dose distribution in the target volume, the conformity index, the dose distribution in organs at risk, and the dose distribution in non-target tissue, respectively, are extracted from the treatment planning studies. Measured out-of-field dose distributions are presented as the dose equivalent as a function of distance from the treatment field. Data in the literature clearly shows that, compared with conventional radiotherapy, IMRT improves the dose distribution in the target volume, which may increase the probability of tumor control. IMRT also seems to increase the out-of-field dose distribution, as well as the irradiated non-target volume, although the data is not consistent, leading to a potentially increased risk of radiation induced secondary malignancies, while decreasing the dose to normal tissues close to the target volume, reducing the normal tissue complication probability. Protons show no or only minor advantage on the dose distribution in the target volume and the conformity index compared to IMRT. However, the data consistently shows that proton beam therapy substantially decreases the OAR average dose compared to the other two techniques. It is also clear that protons provide an improved dose distribution in non-target tissues compared to conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. IMRT and proton beam therapy may significantly improve tumor control for cancer patients and quality of life for long-term cancer survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17497313     DOI: 10.1080/02841860701218626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  20 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Excessive applicator radiation leakage for a common therapeutic kilovoltage system.

Authors:  Brad Beeksma; Joerg Lehmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.

Authors:  Steven J Frank; James D Cox; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Jan S Lewin; Mark F Munsell; Matthew B Palmer; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparison of out-of-field photon doses in 6 MV IMRT and neutron doses in proton therapy for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Basit S Athar; Bryan Bednarz; Joao Seco; Cindy Hancox; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Estimation of organs doses and radiation-induced secondary cancer risk from scattered photons for conventional radiation therapy of nasopharynx: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Asghar Mesbahi; Farshad Seyednejad; Amir Gasemi-Jangjoo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  The clinical implications of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with esophageal or lung cancer after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Isis Gayed; Salman Gohar; Zhongxing Liao; Mary McAleer; Roland Bassett; Syed Wamique Yusuf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury.

Authors:  Daphne Haas-Kogan; Daniel Indelicato; Harald Paganetti; Natia Esiashvili; Anita Mahajan; Torunn Yock; Stella Flampouri; Shannon MacDonald; Maryam Fouladi; Kry Stephen; John Kalapurakal; Stephanie Terezakis; Hanne Kooy; David Grosshans; Mike Makrigiorgos; Kavita Mishra; Tina Young Poussaint; Kenneth Cohen; Thomas Fitzgerald; Vinai Gondi; Arthur Liu; Jeff Michalski; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan; Stephanie Perkins; Kenneth Wong; Bhadrasain Vikram; Jeff Buchsbaum; Larry Kun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Immediate reconstruction with an expander/implant following ablatio mammae because of breast cancer : side effects and cosmetic results after adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth; Daniela M Piroth; Michael Pinkawa; Seth G Woodruff; Richard Holy; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.